Showing posts with label Mary Tyler Moore. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mary Tyler Moore. Show all posts

Sunday, September 28, 2025

2024-25 Saturdays with the Stars Recap

Debbie Reynolds & Audrey Hepburn, two of
our stars this year
It took longer than I expected, but we have finished up our sixth season of Saturdays with the Stars.  I will be honest-I don't entirely know whether or not this will be our final season.  I have two ideas rolling around my head for a theoretical seventh season (I do love this series...along with the My Ballots, it's my favorite thing I do here), both of which would be interesting, but I also am respecting that I chose to step away from longer-term blog commitments for a reason, and to some degree I'm making more of that time (exercising more, watching more OVP movies, reading considerably more), while other writing projects I've not yet gotten a good routine around in the way I used to have for this blog.  If we do do another season, it won't be until January, so we will for sure be getting a few months off regardless as I attempt two writing projects in the meantime.  I am unequivocally glad that I decided to finish this season up, though, regardless, as I don't love an unfinished project, and this had been bugging me.

One of the things that I'm struck by this season is that, for a large part, the movies this season were not as well-received by me as our past five years.  Part of this is my self-imposed rule that I don't repeat films I've already seen.  Some of these women have been in great movies, occasionally (like Audrey Hepburn in Roman Holiday and Julia Roberts in Notting Hill) in movies that I would happily name-check as all-time favorites.  But I will also own that the title of being "America's Sweetheart" means that, even more than our second season focusing on sex symbols, the public limits how much risk the studio is willing to take on you.  With the exception of Sally Field, none of the women we talked about this month were able to have the same level of financial success when they were America's Sweetheart as they would after they would free themselves of that title, and thus while there are definitely good performances...they aren't as frequent.  I did still see some great work (and great movies), but I will own that none of the 12 films that I saw this year looks like a future medalist in our My Ballot Best Picture category (at best, it'll be one of the other titles that fill up the ten-wide Best Picture field), and only a couple of the performances will likely end up as My Ballot nominees for acting.  Still, there's more to life than awards, and there's lots of fluff & fun to recommend here.  Below, find my superlatives from our sixth season of Saturdays with the Stars.

Favorite Performance from Each Star 

August: Sandra Dee, Gidget
November (but really August 2025): Julia Roberts, Mystic Pizza
December (but really September 2025): Meg Ryan, Joe Versus the Volcano

5 Favorite Performers (Alphabetical, and based solely on the films we watched as a collective & not on the rest of their careers)


5 Favorite Performances of the Year (Alphabetical)


12 Favorite Films of the Year (Alphabetical)


Top 12 Performances of the Year (Not By Our Stars...and Yes, Alphabetical)

Frankie Avalon, Beach Party
Jimmy Durante, Two Girls and a Sailor
Timothy Hutton, Ordinary People
Tommy Kirk, Babes in Toyland
Hattie McDaniel, The Little Colonel
Jimmy Stewart, The Glenn Miller Story
Donald Sutherland, Ordinary People
Elizabeth Taylor, Little Women
Denzel Washington, Courage Under Fire

Saturday, September 28, 2024

Flirting with Disaster (1996)

Film: Flirting with Disaster (1996)
Stars: Ben Stiller, Patricia Arquette, Tea Leoni, Alan Alda, Mary Tyler Moore, George Segal, Lily Tomlin, Richard Jenkins, Josh Brolin
Director: David O. Russell
Oscar History: No nominations
Snap Judgment Ranking: 2/5 stars

Each month, as part of our 2024 Saturdays with the Stars series, we are looking at the women who were once crowned as "America's Sweethearts" and the careers that inspired that title (and what happened when they eventually lost it to a new generation).  This month, our focus is on Mary Tyler Moore: click here to learn more about Ms. Moore (and why I picked her), and click here for other Saturdays with the Stars articles.

Despite starring in a Best Picture winner (and nearly taking an Oscar herself), Mary Tyler Moore was never able to have the kind of success in film that she had in television outside of Ordinary People.  She'd make just two movies in the 1980's, and would largely stick to stage work, here as a producer rather than an actress (she would win a Tony in 1985 for Best Revival for A Day in the Death of Joe Egg), and she'd have continued sporadic success on television (she'd get nominated for acting in four TV Movie/Miniseries, winning for 1993's Stolen Babies), but film work simply didn't happen for Moore.  The most significant film she made was in 1996, one of David O. Russell's earlier pictures, called Flirting with Disaster, which was a surprise hit for Miramax at the time, during an era where Miramax still meant edgy new voices in cinema rather than plush Oscar prestige projects.  So we will end our discussion of Moore with this movie, where she plays a supporting part as Ben Stiller's adoptive mother.

(Spoilers Ahead) The movie focuses on Mel (Stiller), who has recently had a son with his wife Nancy (Arquette), but is unable to know what to name the baby until he knows where he comes from.  Mel was adopted as a baby by Pearl (Moore) & Ed (Segal), but has always wanted to know his birth parents.  He is trying to find this through Tina (Leoni), an adoption agent who is also clearly sparking a romantic connection with Mel, exacerbated by him seemingly not finding his wife attractive as she has not lost her baby weight yet.  This leads to a series of mishaps, including Tina incorrectly getting the birth parents wrong twice before finding out that it's Mary (Tomlin) & Richard (Alda) who are his birth parents...but they're also drug producers who after accidentally drugging one of the ATF agents that have started following Mel, Nancy, & Tina around, go on the run from the law.  Mel decides in the end that he didn't need to find his birth parents to find his identity, and ends up naming the baby Garcia after Jerry Garcia.  The end credits shows he and Nancy now happy after the anguish of finding his family.

I will own that I don't like the movies of David O. Russell as a rule (the one exception being Silver Linings Playbook).  I find the films too mean, the characters so irredeemable that I don't want them to get happy endings.  This is true for Flirting with Disaster.  Mel is an awful man, basically mistreating his wife because he thinks she's too fat, and actively trying to have a relationship with Tina even while he is putting his wife through hell.  That he gets a fully happy ending feels like a Woody Allen movie, and indeed, that's what Russell is attempting to do here without the sophistication.  All of the supporting parts, including Moore, are played as caricatures.  The best of the bunch is Josh Brolin as the world's most adorable gay ATF agent, smitten with Nancy, though clearly also gay, but he's not in enough of the movie for you to care.  A waste of your time, even if I get that this might've read as fresh still in 1996.

Moore would work sporadically in TV guest spots throughout the rest of her life, and write two memoirs.  She'd also reunite with all of the Mary Tyler Moore ladies briefly on Hot in Cleveland (which starred her sitcom costar Betty White), a bittersweet moment because at the time their former costar Valerie Harper had just been diagnosed with terminal cancer, and wasn't expected to live much longer.  It was Moore, though, who would die first of the five women on the show.  After years of liver & kidney complications driven by diabetes and issues with alcohol, she passed away in 2017 at the age of 80 from pneumonia.  Next month, we're going to talk about another woman who, like Moore, would get her start in TV sitcoms in the 1960's, but unlike Moore, would graduate into proper movie stardom (and Oscar glory) in the years that followed.

Saturday, September 21, 2024

OVP: Ordinary People (1980)

Film: Ordinary People (1980)
Stars: Donald Sutherland, Mary Tyler Moore, Timothy Hutton, Judd Hirsch
Director: Robert Redford
Oscar History: 6 nominations/4 wins (Best Picture*, Director*, Actress-Mary Tyler Moore, Supporting Actor-Timothy Hutton*, Supporting Actor-Judd Hirsch, Adapted Screenplay*)
Snap Judgment Ranking: 4/5 stars

Each month, as part of our 2024 Saturdays with the Stars series, we are looking at the women who were once crowned as "America's Sweethearts" and the careers that inspired that title (and what happened when they eventually lost it to a new generation).  This month, our focus is on Mary Tyler Moore: click here to learn more about Ms. Moore (and why I picked her), and click here for other Saturdays with the Stars articles.

It's hard to express what a big deal The Mary Tyler Moore Show was when it was on in the 1970's.  The show wasn't a gargantuan-style Friends-esque behemoth in the ratings (it was a Top 20 hit for five of its seven seasons, so respectable, but was not once in the Top 5, peaking at #7 in Season 3), but it dominated the pop culture landscape.  The show would spawn three spinoffs, including the critically-acclaimed drama Lou Grant, and win more Emmys than any comedy until Frasier over two decades later.  Three of those would be for Moore as Best Actress in a Comedy Series.  As a result of playing Mary Richards, beautiful-but-talented, a single woman who didn't need a husband to be happy (or successful in life), she created a feminist icon.  Oprah Winfrey herself has stated she got into television because of Mary Richards, and the normally composed Winfrey openly wept when Moore made a surprise appearance on her show.  Coming off such a success would be daunting, but Moore chose pretty well for herself.  Being guided by Robert Redford in his directorial debut, Moore won the only Academy Award nomination of her career for 1980's Ordinary People, arguably the only significant film she'd make in her career in terms of passing into cultural relevance, a movie that won an Best Picture Oscar that is still discussed today.

(Spoilers Ahead) The movie is about the Jarretts, living in the suburbs of Chicago in an idllic house, but as you can imagine things at home are not idillic.  Their eldest son Buck has passed away from drowning, an accident on a sailboat that occurred while their younger son Conrad (Hutton) was on the boat, and since then Conrad has attempted suicide & gone to a mental hospital.  Conrad is now back-in-school but unsuccessfully readjusting, and his parents are not handling it the same.  His father Calvin (Sutherland) is amiable but largely hoping the problem will go away if he's kind to his son, while his wife Beth (Moore) wants to pretend nothing is different, and lives a sort of plastic Norman Rockwell-style existence, frequently trying to lift her problematic son out of her life completely.  Conrad is in therapy with Dr. Berger (Hirsch), a tough-talking psychiatrist who wants to get to the root cause of Conrad's problems, many of which he places at the feet of his parents.  As we learn, this is both true and an excuse.  Conrad has the ability to change himself, but not those around him, and when he suffers a breakdown, this comes to a head.  His father is willing to bend and be someone different to stay with the son he has left, but his wife is not, and leaves them before the end of the picture.  It's a hopeful, but bleak (and realistic) ending, and look at what grief can do to a family unit.

Ordinary People's best moments come from the prickliness that happens within a family unit, and how each person plays a part (and what happens when one of them is no longer there to play said part).  I think what's so smart about Redford's direction and the script is the way that it doesn't shy away from this.  It's very clear that Buck was Beth's favorite child, and that Calvin tried to compensate by favoring Conrad, though he wasn't as successful because Beth is the dominant figure in the household.  What is more intriguing is watching Beth & Calvin's own realities start to dissipate as we move into the movie.  It's clear that while Calvin loved both the boys, Beth might not have loved either of them, or at least not in a conventional way...she saw them as ornaments for her life, things to show to her friends.  There's an extremely uncomfortable but telling moment where Calvin wants to get a photo of Beth & Conrad together, and while Conrad is willing, Beth refuses, insisting she doesn't need it, and you see the look on Timothy Hutton's face as he understands in real time his mother no longer even wants to be seen next to him, he has strayed so far from what is acceptable as her ornament.  This is a very real type of mother (just look at all of the parents who abandon their children for being gay or trans), who only loves their child if they match the vision they have of them in their head.

And it's a testament to Moore (and the writers) that she doesn't get a redemption.  Part of what makes this performance so good is that Moore's Beth is not someone who is going to change, because she'll never see what she's doing as wrong.  She is the sort of person who has never considered that her worldview might be incorrect, and while Conrad & Calvin are capable of such introspection, she is not, which makes the ending work really well-you get a sense of her going back into her own life of golf, cocktail parties, & church fundraisers, everyone gossiping about how lonely she is behind her back but too afraid to reach out for fear of her slapping their hand.  All of the performers in this are good (Sutherland's blistered dad, Hutton's damaged son, even the least of the main quartet Hirsch's hipster doctor works more than he doesn't), but Moore is the best because she manages to play unlikeable so real.

The big controversy for any Oscar watcher (this is one of the very rare Best Picture winners I'd never seen) is that it beat Martin Scorsese's Raging Bull, and so (for the record) I want to acknowledge that this is not as good as Raging Bull (few movies are).  That movie does more with form, and has a better central performance.  But it is strong, and I get why it has developed a sort of second battalion of defenders in recent years after being something of a How Green Was My Valley/Dances with Wolves-style punching bag for so many years.  It's a great movie...it just probably shouldn't have beaten a masterpiece.

Saturday, September 14, 2024

Change of Habit (1969)

Film: Change of Habit (1969)
Stars: Elvis Presley, Mary Tyler Moore, Barbara McNair, Janet Elliot, Leora Dana, Edward Asner
Director: William A. Graham
Oscar History: No nominations
Snap Judgment Ranking: 1/5 stars

Each month, as part of our 2024 Saturdays with the Stars series, we are looking at the women who were once crowned as "America's Sweethearts" and the careers that inspired that title (and what happened when they eventually lost it to a new generation).  This month, our focus is on Mary Tyler Moore: click here to learn more about Ms. Moore (and why I picked her), and click here for other Saturdays with the Stars articles.

Mary Tyler Moore was an interesting test for Hollywood coming out of The Dick van Dyke Show.  Before Moore, most of the critically-acclaimed actresses of TV comedy had been women who were already well-known in film & radio like Lucille Ball, Donna Reed, & Gracie Allen.  Also, most of the women that were finding success in television were doing so as sitcom mothers, and were therefore older than your average Hollywood leading lady.  But Moore, when Dick van Dyke ended, was only thirty...certainly not an ingenue's age, but considerably to the north of the ages of women like Jane Wyatt & Barbara Billingsley who were getting their big breaks in TV.  As a result, Moore was given a contract with Universal, but despite a series of leading roles, she never got the kind of film fame that, say, Mia Farrow got for leaving Peyton Place at roughly the same time (Farrow being involved in one of the 1960's most sensational celebrity marriages to Frank Sinatra probably helped her cause a bit too).  Moore made a series of forgettable pictures during this time frame, most notably the Oscar-winning hit Thoroughly Modern Millie with Julie Andrews, but by 1969 she was starring in her final leading part for more than a decade on film (thankfully TV still had the role of a lifetime waiting for her), and that movie was one of the oddest imaginable: one where she's a nun, falling in love with an inner-city doctor...played by Elvis Presley.

(Spoilers Ahead) The film is about three nuns (Moore as Sister Michelle, McNair as Sister Irene, and Elliot as Sister Barbara), who are instructed to go and work as nurses in an inner-city clinic with Dr. John Carpenter (Presley, and yes, that is somehow the character's name if you ever need a good trivia question for a horror fan friend).  They are to do so in plain clothes, and do not tell anyone that they are nuns, which makes some of the neighbors assume that they are a bunch of loose women living together.  John doesn't like them-he thinks they're too "square" and don't understand what it's like being poor and living "in the ghetto" (his hit song is not sung at any point during this movie, but you feel like it's going to be belted out at any moment), but slowly they grow on him, particularly Sister Michelle, who inexplicably (to him) spurns his advances even though she's clearly taken with him.  Eventually, they are called back to the church, with John realizing that he's been pursuing a woman-of-the-veil, but still wants her.  The film ends ambiguously, with Sister Michelle not sure if she will go after John or stay a nun, and goes to pray in a church...where we see John singing gospel music as she solemnly considers her choice.

This is, and I cannot stress this enough, just part of Change of Habit, a movie that's so weird you almost want to like it even if it's terrible.  There's a subplot with a young girl, depicting what may well have been the first onscreen depiction of autism in a Hollywood movie, and McNair's Sister Irene has a whole subplot over whether or not she has betrayed her "Black roots" by becoming a nun in a wealthy Park Avenue parish.  We also have a really disturbing scene late in the picture, where a troubled young man, on the run from the law, attempting to rape Moore, which, I'll be honest-watching Mary Richards in that situation was way too scarring for me & I seriously considered fast forwarding.

All of this is a lot of plot, and none of it is handled well.  The film's sexual and racial politics are clunky, even in 1969, and Presley is actively awful in this picture.  The star persona is still there, but honestly with a bad script and a weak performance, you can tell that he had not learned much about acting in his 31-film career, and this would be his final movie (and the only one where he would play a character with a college degree).  Moore also doesn't know how to adapt to this.  It's hard to imagine watching this, where she's too spunky and doesn't get the material, that she'd have an Oscar nomination and three more Emmys on her resumé within a little over a decade's time.

Saturday, September 07, 2024

What's So Bad About Feeling Good?

Film: What's So Bad About Feeling Good? (1968)
Stars: George Peppard, Mary Tyler Moore, Dom DeLuise, John McMartin, Thelma Ritter
Director: George Seaton
Oscar History: No nominations
Snap Judgment Ranking: 2/5 stars

Each month, as part of our 2024 Saturdays with the Stars series, we are looking at the women who were once crowned as "America's Sweethearts" and the careers that inspired that title (and what happened when they eventually lost it to a new generation).  This month, our focus is on Mary Tyler Moore: click here to learn more about Ms. Moore (and why I picked her), and click here for other Saturdays with the Stars articles.

Mary Tyler Moore, as we pointed out when we kicked off this month, is very much a TV star first and a film star second.  Though other actresses we've talked about this year (such as Doris Day and Annette Funicello) had success in TV, Moore is the only actress we're going to discuss that the public almost exclusively associates with television.  That's because small screen success came pretty early.  She made her cinematic debut in Operation Mad Ball as a non-speaking nurse opposite Jack Lemmon, but it wasn't until 1961 that the public seemed to care who she was when she got the lead in The Dick van Dyke Show as the titular van Dyke's onscreen wife Laura Petrie.  Moore was a sensation, as was the show.  A now beloved series (if you've never seen it, you're in for a treat), it was a Top 10 hit for three seasons, and won 15 Emmys, including one for Moore as Best Actress.  The show went out on-top (van Dyke was begged by CBS to continue, but he wanted to end with the audience wanting more...something modern actors should have the class to consider), and Moore briefly turned to movies under a contract with Universal Pictures.  One of the first films she made was What's So Bad About Feeling Good?, our film today.

(Spoilers Ahead) The movie is about a pandemic sweeping across New York, where a toucan has come into the harbor and infects people with a disease that makes them unabashedly happy and euphoric.  It initially lands in the loft of a group of beatniks, including Pete (Peppard) and Liz (Moore).  Pete is infected, and suddenly he goes from being a glum, downtrodden pessimist to a joyous optimist.  The rest of their commune follow the same pattern, except for Liz, who is immune to the bird...but with so much positivity around her, she feels happy and in love with the new Pete.  The government (including John McMartin as a besotted Mayor and Dom DeLuise as a bumbling scientist) eventually stops the plague, given the worry that it'll hurt productivity and capitalism (one person in the Mayor's office suggests tearing down Wall Street to build a park, to the Mayor's horror).  Pete goes back to normal, but Liz can't-this change was real for her, and she leaves...but not before Pete decides to change too, and they rush and steal the toucan from the zoo, potentially to bring back the infection somewhere else and go live in bliss.

If you're reading that description and thinking "this feels prescient," you're not alone.  An episode of This American Life in 2020 talked about the film's bizarre similarities to the Covid-19 crisis, including how mask-wearing was encouraged in this film.  Of course, this is a lighthearted, silly comedy (and the disease isn't fatal).  It's also not a particularly good movie, unfortunately.  The film needs considerably more humor.  My thought has always been about comedy that, more than any other genre, it dates horribly, particularly when it's doing cultural commentary, which this does (the paranoia of the 1960's, the grooviness & pointlessness of hippie culture).  Dom DeLuise, in particular, feels like he's missing a pretty big opportunity by coming into the film late and not getting much in terms of visual comedy except at one point wearing a space helmet to protect himself from the virus.

Moore also isn't great here.  One of the things I'm curious about with Moore is that, for an actress who was very, very famous on television (and also quite gifted), her film career really only boils down to one movie (Ordinary People) in terms of critics' & audiences' memories.  I thought there might be a hidden gem here, but I was wrong.  The chemistry between she and Peppard is too strained, with Peppard's bland handsomeness not a good pairing with her cheerful spunk.  The ending should be more fulfilling, but we've had too little growth, especially from Peppard, to really land the plane on that front, and so you just are like "that was cute" rather than getting all of the feels.  A missed opportunity, but almost worth watching just from the curiosity perspective (in relation to the Covid pandemic).

Sunday, September 01, 2024

Saturdays with the Stars: Mary Tyler Moore

Each month of 2024 we are taking a look at an actress who bore the title "America's Sweetheart" during the peak of her film fame, and what she did with the title (including when it was passed on to the next Hollywood princess).  Last month, we focused on Sandra Dee, a blonde beauty with a tragic real-life story that was mocked further when she became a pop culture punching bag in Grease.  This month, we're going to focus on an actress whose primary fame was not in film, but in television, and that was honestly where she gained her title as "America's Sweetheart."  But I wanted to talk about the actress because I think she's a fascinating example of a TV actress who, while she didn't find equal fame in the movies, was able to sustain her career through the cinema.  This month's star is Mary Tyler Moore.

Born in Brooklyn to an Irish-Catholic family, Moore moved to California as a young woman, and from an early age tragedy was a major part of her life, with her younger sister Elizabeth dying from issues with drugs at the age of only 21.  In Los Angeles, the comely Moore started to do commercials, which eventually turned into television guest spots on TV series like The Tab Hunter Show, 77 Sunset Strip, & Lock-Up.  Her big break came in 1961, when she was cast as Laura Petrie in The Dick van Dyke Show.  The series became a mammoth critical & commercial hit, and turned Moore into a household name.  A decade after Dick van Dyke began, Moore would star in what is considered by many to be the greatest sitcom of all time, her eponymous Mary Tyler Moore Show.

Moore was one of a number of women in the 1960's and 70's who would fit the bill of "America's Sweetheart" and was a major name in television; others included Elizabeth Montgomery, Barbara Eden, Marlo Thomas, & Sandy Duncan.  But what sets Moore apart from these women is she gained more critical acclaim as a TV performer (winning five Emmy statues), and success in film.  Moore would star opposite major names of the era like Robert Wagner, Julie Andrews, Elvis Presley & Jack Lemmon, and would eventually win an Academy Award nomination.  Moore would also, sadly, fit the trope of many of the women we've profiled this year, fighting inner-demons as well as suffering unspeakable personal traumas throughout her life.  This month while we'll talk about her television success, we're going to look primarily at her work on film, and the legacy the actress left there that is oftentimes forgotten in the spotlight of her two legendary sitcoms.

Saturday, October 09, 2021

OVP: Thoroughly Modern Millie (1967)

Film: Thoroughly Modern Millie (1967)
Stars: Julie Andrews, James Fox, Mary Tyler Moore, John Gavin, Carol Channing, Beatrice Lillie, Jack Soo, Pat Morita
Director: George Roy Hill
Oscar History: 7 nominations/1 win (Best Supporting Actress-Carol Channing, Art Direction, Costume Design, Score*, Song Score, Original Song-"Thoroughly Modern Millie," Sound)
Snap Judgment Ranking: 2/5 stars

Each month, as part of our 2021 Saturdays with the Stars series, we highlight a different one Alfred Hitchcock's Leading Ladies.  This month, our focus is on Julie Andrews-click here to learn more about Ms. Andrews (and why I picked her), and click here for other Saturdays with the Stars articles.

Last week, we started out our conversation about Julie Andrews with not Mary Poppins nor The Sound of Music (both of which I'd seen many times), but instead with Torn Curtain for our Alfred Hitchcock month, a movie that she felt an ill-fit for.  Andrews is a unique actress for modern audiences because she is so well-known for two beloved children's classics (and later had a bit of a renaissance with The Princess Diaries and voiceover work in the Shrek and Despicable Me franchises for a new generation of kids), but those two films kind of hide the fact that she was a big star for a time, and her career had ebbs-and-flows.  You could argue that the final major wave of her first, most successful period in film happened in 1967 with today's Thoroughly Modern Millie, the last big hit before Andrews would endure two extremely high-profile flops that would totally stall her film career...but more on those two pictures next week.  Today we're going to raise our skirts & bob our hair with Millie.

(Spoilers Ahead) The movie takes place in New York City in 1922, where Millie (Andrews) has decided to become a "modern," basically taking on the flapper aesthetic & getting a job as a stenographer which she hopes will result in her finding an "equal" as her husband (i.e. marry her boss).  In the beginning of the movie she meets Dorothy (Moore), a hapless aspiring actress who is always lost, and is the target of Mrs. Meers (Lillie) who is their landlord...who is also running a human trafficking ring by kidnapping girls staying with her who don't have families.  Millie is pursued by Jimmy (Fox), a poor paper clips salesman but is enamored by Mr. Graydon (Gavin), her gorgeous boss.  The film follows the love square between the four, and the occasional appearance of Muzzy (Channing), who is an eccentric wealthy widow who randomly shows up at opportune times throughout the movie.  In the end we find out that not only does Millie love Jimmy (and Dorothy loves Mr. Graydon), but that Jimmy is actually Dorothy's wealthy brother (and Muzzy's stepson).  Oh, and they end the prostitution ring.

Thoroughly Modern Millie is meant to skewer a lot of things, though it's rarely successful in this endeavor.  Mocking the rich, gender norms, and how we fantasize about both when we watch the movies, the film doesn't really have the edge to make that work, and we end up with a film that accidentally glamorizes what it's intending to mock.  This might be forgivable, as would the repetition & length (the story goes nowhere during the middle hour as Millie can't decide between the two men, even though one has no interest in her whatsoever), were it not for the racism that doesn't even feed the plot.  Lillie (in her final cinematic role as she was starting to suffer from Alzheimer's at the time), is a white woman bossing around a group of Asian men (Jack Soo & Pat Morita), and it's just...gross.  The way all of the Asian actors are used as props & stereotypes-even in 1967 they should've known better & it's so ancillary to the central plot it's ridiculous.  It also feels pretty eyebrow-raising to have something as serious as sex slavery be treated basically as an excuse for the main cast to do a series of acrobatic tricks in a mansion (we don't usually get people THIS evil in a musical, even the villains).

Andrews is fine here even if this isn't amongst her best work.  Unlike Torn Curtain she was perfect cast here-Millie is the kind of role that Andrews can nail, but the movie itself is dull, and Andrews doesn't get enough of a change-of-pace to help save the film from itself.  That task instead goes to Carol Channing, who in 1967 was best known for her "role of a lifetime" Broadway part in Hello Dolly!.  Channing is one of those singular talents on stage & screen that's hard to explain, an actress so specific it's difficult to ever see her playing anything other than her schtick.  I honestly don't have a lot of words here-her Muzzy shows up randomly, has little to do with the plot, & is absolutely insane.  One gets the sense that someone like Gwen Verdon or Shirley MacLaine might have been a better fit for this role, grounding it while also getting some of the humor, but Channing definitely comes in & upends the film. I want to like this performance because it's definitely something, but it's so unusual I don't really know what to do with it.

Otherwise, the rest of the Oscar nominations are a mixed bag.  The Art Direction is boring & overdone, the costumes are not much better (though I loved Andrews' iconic black-and-white flapper look), and the sound is okay (it feels like some of the scenes are a bit washed out, particularly the musical numbers that don't involve Channing).  The score is much better (somehow this movie is Elmer Bernstein's only Oscar), and the scoring is fun.  Best of the bunch is the title song, which is lyrically delicious ("they think is odd and Sodom and Gomorrah-ble" is among the sharpest lines in an original American musical), even though we don't really get a giant musical number around it like I would've hoped (most of the rest of the songs are standards, as this, "Jimmy," and "The Tapioca" are the only originals).  The song, played over the opening credits, promises a great movie that what follows cannot bother to deliver.