Showing posts with label Yul Brynner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Yul Brynner. Show all posts

Saturday, December 30, 2023

2023 Saturdays with the Stars Recap

Yesterday we finished up our month with Kris Kristofferson, and today, we are putting the final cap on our "When Cowboys Ruled Hollywood" season.  I will totally own this, our fifth season, is probably my favorite season we've done since Season 2 (when we tackled sex symbols), and maybe my favorite ever.  I knew going into this that westerns have always been one of my favorite genres, and getting to see such a wide array, including a lot of hidden gems that have been on the To Do list for a while, was an absolute treat.  But I didn't realize how many of the films would end up being downright classics, from Sergio Leone's Dollars trilogy to some of the gorgeous westerns that Anthony Mann made with Jimmy Stewart, there are movies on this list that have quickly catapulted to my favorite westerns list, and I have even added a few already to my home collection.

The biggest thing that excited me, though, was how this really ended up being the tale of Hollywood, starting with The Big Trail and ending with Heaven's Gate, and how much of Classical & New Hollywood came in-between.  This has been the case in all of our seasons, but seeing it through the most American of genres, the western, it felt like I was hearing it for the first time.  We'll get into our sixth season, where we will be "Crowning America's Sweethearts," on Saturday, but one last time, take a look at some of the best from this season of "When Cowboys Ruled Hollywood."

Favorite Performance from Each Star 

January: Gary Cooper, Man of the West
February: James Stewart, The Naked Spur
March: Gregory Peck, The Gunfighter
April: Marlene Dietrich, Witness for the Prosecution
May: Randolph Scott, Ride the High Country
June: Yul Brynner, Westworld
July: John Wayne, The Shootist
August: Franco Nero, Querelle
September: Clint Eastwood, The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
October: Robert Redford, Barefoot in the Park
November: Sam Elliott, Molly and Lawless John
December: Kris Kristofferson, Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore

5 Favorite Performers (Alphabetical, and based solely on the films we watched as a collective & not on the rest of their careers)


5 Favorite Performances of the Year (Alphabetical)


12 Favorite Films of the Year (Alphabetical)


Top 12 Performances of the Year (Not By Our Stars...and Yes, Alphabetical)

Dan Duryea, Winchester 73
Mariette Hartley, Ride the High Country
Burl Ives, The Big Country
Elsa Lanchester, Witness for the Prosecution
Charles Laughton, Witness for the Prosecution
Lee van Cleef, For a Few Dollars More

Saturday, June 24, 2023

Westworld (1973)

Film: Westworld (1973)
Stars: Yul Brynner, Richard Benjamin, James Brolin
Director: Michael Crichton
Oscar History: No nominations
Snap Judgment Ranking: 4/5 stars

Each month, as part of our 2023 Saturdays with the Stars series, we are looking at the Golden Age western, and the stars who made it one of the most enduring legacies of Classical Hollywood.  This month, our focus is on Yul Brynner: click here to learn more about Mr. Brynner (and why I picked him), and click here for other Saturdays with the Stars articles.

By the 1970's, Yul Brynner's career had steply declined from the heyday that had once brought him classics like The King & I, The Ten Commandments, and The Magnificent Seven in short order.  He was consistently broke, and throughout the 1960's had starred in increasingly bad movies, particularly the 1969 flop musical The Madwoman of Chaillot with Katharine Hepburn & Charles Boyer, desperate for money.  For much of the latter years of his life, he split his time between bit work in movies & television, and doing versions of his King Mongkut role, playing it in London, Broadway, and even a brief run on a TV series (yes, dear friends, The King & I was a 12-episode TV sitcom on CBS in 1972 before it was cancelled, and yes I'm desperate to see it if anyone has the means).  Brynner, though, did have one last classic role in him, an unlikely SciFi hit in 1973 that would also spawn a (much, much more successful series) decades later after his death: Westworld.

(Spoilers Ahead) Taking place in 1983, the film is about a high-tech amusement park, run by the Delos corporation that allows guests to live as figures in either a western, medieval, or ancient Roman world.  Debauchery & violence are encouraged, and because there are precautions, the guests are unable to be harmed.  Our two main protagonists are Peter Martin (Benjamin), who is visiting the park for the first time after a divorce, and his pal John Blane (Brolin), who has been in the park multiple times before.  They enjoy the western motif, hooking up with old-timey prostitutes (that are actually robots) and fighting the Gunslinger (Brynner), a robot that is part of the plot and killed multiple times by Peter.  But as the film goes on, it's clear a type of computer virus has inserted itself into the park, putting the guests in danger, including John & Peter, who are now going to have to fight the Gunslinger for real.

There's a lot to say about Westworld, but let's start with the truly groundbreaking aspects of it.  Written & directed by Michael Crichton (most well-known today for authoring the Jurassic Park novels), despite being made on the cheap, the film is the first movie in Hollywood history to use digital image processing (essentially the forefather of CGI).  The moments are brief (they are essentially seen as the way that Brynner's Gunslinger can see the world), but it's an incredible feat and obviously important to the future of cinema.  It's insane that the film didn't get any Oscar attention, because in addition to this, the art direction, costuming, editing, scoring, and especially the makeup & effects (there's a great scene where Brynner's face looks like it's fizzing that's kind of incredible) all were worthy of recognition (I said to future John, reminding myself to include these in the 1973 My Ballot).

The movie overall, honestly, is really well-done.  Crichton keeps it very lean, focused largely on these three men, and clocking in at less than 90 minutes.  The movie doesn't have the conversations about the morality of the place that would become central to the HBO series (which I loved-full disclosure that I was a huge fan of the series right up until the end, and am still angry that HBO cancelled it, and even angrier that they yanked it from their streaming platform, even though I had the foresight to invest in physical media for it...so I come in with a propensity to love this), but it does have a great, unfolding take on the western.  We're not quite to the point where we're going to talk about how New Hollywood changed the westerns (our July star is very much a Classical Hollywood figure), but Westworld is a good introduction to how New Hollywood would skewer and sometimes upend the legend of the Old West, here introducing science fiction elements.

And it would introduce a great new part of Yul Brynner's lexicon.  This is some of his best work, as a robot that starts to realize not only his own place in the world, but that he is, in fact, as good as his myth.  Brynner's part isn't as big as you'd suspect, but he steals every scene he's in, and I get why this was a sizable hit.  Brynner would return a few years later in the sequel Futureworld, but as I said-this wasn't a new phase for his career, just a brief highlight.  He'd do theater for the remainder of his career, and die in 1985 from lung cancer, though he stayed badass to the end, filming an anti-smoking campaign that he mandated to be released after his death, basically becoming one of the first major celebrities to talk publicly about the link between smoking and cancer.

I hate that this is the transition here, but next month, we're also going to talk about a man who died of cancer before his time (and a lifelong smoker).  But while this actor, like Brynner, would become synonymous with the western, his career didn't have nearly the ups-and-downs.  Indeed, for over 40 years he would be the textbook definition of a movie star, and one of the most successful leading men of all-time.  Stay tuned as we reach the halfway point of our fifth season next Saturday.

Saturday, June 17, 2023

OVP: Return of the Seven (1966)

Film: Return of the Seven (1966)
Stars: Yul Brynner, Robert Fuller, Julian Mateos, Warren Oates, Claude Akins, Jordan Christopher
Director: Burt Kennedy
Oscar History: 1 nomination (Best Scoring)
Snap Judgment Ranking: 1/5 stars

Each month, as part of our 2023 Saturdays with the Stars series, we are looking at the Golden Age western, and the stars who made it one of the most enduring legacies of Classical Hollywood.  This month, our focus is on Yul Brynner: click here to learn more about Mr. Brynner (and why I picked him), and click here for other Saturdays with the Stars articles.

During the first few years of Yul Brynner's career, he managed to defy expectations.  While quite good-looking, he didn't have the conventional, prototypical good looks of a Rock Hudson or Paul Newman, but he was a constant box office presence who managed in five years to win an Oscar, star in multiple film classics, and a slew of blockbusters.  But after The Magnificent Seven, Brynner's career took a pretty steep and largely unyielding slide.  Though he continued to star in major studio films opposite big names like Tony Curtis, Marlon Brando, & Kirk Douglas, most of his movies of the 1960's were flops, and as we'll discuss next week when we close our month with him, this continued well into the 1970's.  One of the few exceptions to this rule was Return of the Seven, with Brynner returning to not only the western, but to his character of Chris Adams for his one undisputed hit of the era.

(Spoilers Ahead) The movie follows a very similar plot to The Magnificent Seven.  Here, a group of men in a small Mexican village are forced to join a gang of marauders, leaving the women behind to fend for themselves.  One of the men kidnapped is Chico (Mateos), who was one of the survivors of The Magnificent Seven.  When his wife goes to find Chris (Adams) and Vin (Fuller), they pledge to help her, but first must recruit a group of four other men to replace the deceased members of the original seven (including Sheriff Lobo himself Claude Akins and Jordan Christopher, who was in the band The Wild Ones, who recorded a flop record in 1965 that The Troggs would make legendary a year later called "Wild Thing").  The men go and stop the marauders, and while some live, Chris, Vin, & Chico end their story in the same place, with Chico left behind while Chris & Vin ride off into the sunset.

The movie has almost none of the magic of the original, and part of that starts with the cast.  The only returning member from the original movie is Brynner, and it shows.  Without Steve McQueen, James Coburn, & Charles Bronson, a lot of the movie star charisma is gone, and this feels cheap.  The plot is a ripoff of the original movie, almost more of a remake than a proper sequel, and you spend half of the movie trying to realize that the character played by Robert Fuller is Steve McQueen's character.  It's cheap, and quite frankly a bad movie.

It also weirdly got an Oscar nomination for Best Score.  Elmer Bernstein's original score was a classic, a genius invention & one of the essential tunes of the movie western.  This movie...uses the same score, getting nominated for a re-recording in the Best Scoring category (since it wouldn't have been eligible for Score).  It's indistinguishable from the original's main themes...except the plot is so similar there's not even new themes for the music to interpret.  Honestly, it's a really weird nomination, and while 1966 isn't a year known for musicals, I'm confident they could've found something more inspired.  As a result, this isn't going to fare well for our OVP, even if the music is good on its own.

Saturday, June 10, 2023

OVP: The Magnificent Seven (1960)

Film: The Magnificent Seven (1960)
Stars: Yul Brynner, Steve McQueen, Horst Buchholz, Charles Bronson, Robert Vaughn, Brad Dexter, James Coburn, Eli Wallach
Director: John Sturges
Oscar History: 1 nomination (Best Score)
Snap Judgment Ranking: 3/5 stars

Each month, as part of our 2023 Saturdays with the Stars series, we are looking at the Golden Age western, and the stars who made it one of the most enduring legacies of Classical Hollywood.  This month, our focus is on Yul Brynner: click here to learn more about Mr. Brynner (and why I picked him), and click here for other Saturdays with the Stars articles.

Throughout this year, we're profiling a lot of western stars, obviously, and with that, a lot of westerns.  These are all westerns that I've never seen before, and for the most part, are westerns I'm pretty comfortable saying that I've never seen before.  The films of Anthony Mann & Budd Boetticher are classics, but if we're being honest, they're not classics in the same way that The Searchers or The Wild Bunch are...they aren't universally-seen films by most film fans.  Today, though, we're getting to one of the few classic films of the western genre that I'm kind of looking sideways on, admitting that I have somehow never seen before.  Yul Brynner in 1960 was cast in a movie that, quite frankly, didn't do super well at the domestic box office (it was a smash hit overseas, particularly in the Soviet Union), but in the years that followed has become synonymous with the genre and is arguably the most important (culturally) western that we'll profile all year, and one pretty much everyone who is invested in the genre has seen before.  It is also one of the only westerns to spawn a genuine franchise, with three sequels, a remake, and a TV series all coming out of it, along with an Elmer Bernstein score that counts as one of the most iconic in film history.  Today, we are going to talk about The Magnificent Seven.

(Spoilers Ahead) Based on Akira Kurosawa's Seven Samurai, the movie is about a poor Mexican village that is run by Calvera (Wallach), a ruthless leader of a group of bandits who frequently rob the villagers, who are defenseless, of their food to feed his men, leaving them largely to live by on scraps.  They decide one day to fight back, and look to initially buy guns to defend themselves.  When Chris Adams (Brynner) tells them that men are cheaper than guns (great line), Chris helps them recruit a band of men, seven in total, to defend the city.  Throughout, we learn about these men, who come from different backgrounds (a hotheaded young shootist, a fortune seeker, a knife expert, a drifter...it's a motley crew), but come to find some honor in defending the people of the city.  This honor is what Calvera, who keeps assuming they'll give up, can't see beyond, and it is his downfall.  In a shootout that kills four the seven, Calvera dies, and the townspeople are saved, with Chris and one of the other men, the drifter (played by McQueen) going off into the sunset, with Chris ending with the enigmatic line "only the farmers won...we lost...we'll always lose."

The film itself, I'll be honest, is a pretty standard western on its surface.  The cast was in various stages of their careers, with Brynner at the peak of his stardom, while McQueen, Coburn, & Bronson were all years away from the peak of theirs, and it shows in the casting.  Given where they were in their careers I get why some of these supporting parts weren't given stronger credence in the story (Brynner was the headliner in 1960), but Bronson & Coburn are such good actors I kept wanting more from them.  So the cast itself feeds into the standard western line-a basic story, admittedly one stolen from one of the greatest films ever made, with a misused cast should be cause for complaint.

But it's impossible to care too much because even if it's misused, the film itself still comes off successfully.  The scenes we do get of Coburn, Bronson, and especially Wallach are well-done, and the dialogue is solid, and a bit above-the-board for a western in 1960.  It's also aided by a grand slam score from Elmer Bernstein.  This lost to the theme from Exodus, which is a fine piece of music, don't get me wrong, but given that Bernstein was writing one of the defining pieces of music (it is regularly used in everything from Oscar clips to commercials to other movies) at the time, and that the theme from Psycho, another anthem of Hollywood, wasn't even nominated...the Academy missed the train a little bit on this one.

Saturday, June 03, 2023

OVP: The Brothers Karamazov (1958)

Film: The Brothers Karamazov (1958)
Stars: Yul Brynner, Maria Schell, Claire Bloom, Lee J. Cobb, Albert Salmi, William Shatner, Richard Basehart
Director: Richard Brooks
Oscar History: 1 nomination (Best Supporting Actor-Lee J. Cobb)
Snap Judgment Ranking: 2/5 stars

Each month, as part of our 2023 Saturdays with the Stars series, we are looking at the Golden Age western, and the stars who made it one of the most enduring legacies of Classical Hollywood.  This month, our focus is on Yul Brynner: click here to learn more about Mr. Brynner (and why I picked him), and click here for other Saturdays with the Stars articles.

Yul Brynner is one of those true overnight success stories in Hollywood, someone who came in and was suddenly wildly in demand.  In the late 1950's, he couldn't do any wrong in terms of studio success.  Despite not looking like Rock Hudson or William Holden (he was very handsome, but as a balding man in his late thirties, one who spoke with an unmistakable Russian accent, he didn't fit a previously-known mold), he started in 1956 with the triple threat of The Ten Commandments, Anastasia, and The King & I (the latter winning him an Oscar, all of them being hits), and for the next couple of years he would enjoy a number of hits, even if there were a few flops like The Sound and the Fury and Surprise Package in the mix.  One of those hits we actually talked about for this series when we discussed the career of Gina Lollobrigida, Solomon and Sheba, but a second we haven't had a chance to talk through (even though it was Oscar-nominated) and is how we're going to kick-off our month devoted to Brynner: The Brothers Karamazov.

(Spoilers Ahead) The movie is 145 minutes long and based on an even longer Russian novel (which I've read!), so to summarize the plot into a paragraph is kind of insane.  Essentially you have three brothers (we learn eventually there's a fourth brother who was born illegitimately), each with a different approach to their father Fyodor (Cobb), in some cases cloying (Shatner's Alexey), in other cases defiant (Brynner's Dmitri) and still others a combination of the two (Basehart's Ivan).  The movie shows the shifting and complicating dynamics the three brothers have to faith, Russia, and to their father, specifically his taste for women and excessive fortune.  The major crux of Brothers Karamazov from a plot perspective is the murder of Fyodor and the subsequent trial of Dmitri, whom we know in the audience is innocent...but it's not clear how this will pan out in the movie (and indeed, they change the ending to make it a bit sunnier).

As I said, I've read the book, and as a result I know why this is considered a classic, and while it is a brilliantly-executed, intriguing plot (particularly the relationship between Dmitri and his father), what's captivating about the novel is the way that it gives a sense of Russia itself, decades before the Russian Revolution.  There are entire sections of the novel that are about establishing characters that are completely ancillary to the story (frequently almost poetic segways), and while that's fine (books are not movies, he said for the thousandth time even though some people refuse to hear it), it does mean that the movie has a different task-it has to take characters who are largely etched through their own soliloquies & side adventures, and draw them within the confines of the main plot.  This is harder to do than it sounds, and the movie doesn't have the connection to the material to pull it off.

It's not helped by a weird bit of casting.  Brynner as Dmitri makes sense, one of the few times he plays a Russian character onscreen during this era, and he is the best of the cast though he doesn't get enough to do, but the rest of the performers are not well-considered.  Maria Schell is too passive as Grushenka (the novel's best character), and honestly needs more charisma (Marilyn Monroe actively pursued this role, and I kind of want to see the film with her in it even though I cannot fathom Monroe doing a Russian accent).  William Shatner is a good actor (he has a reputation now as a bit hammy, but look at his episodes of The Twilight Zone for evidence), but comes across as completely American, and one who isn't entirely convinced by his life as a monk (even though he's supposed to be).  And Lee J. Cobb, getting an Oscar nomination, does so by scenery-chewing & overacting.  This isn't always unwelcome during the duller bits of the film, but it doesn't work and there were actors who were a lot better in 1958 who deserved this more.  That this long, boring epic based on a difficult-to-read Russian novel was a hit for MGM in 1958 is a testament either to Brynner's star power or to a public that was hungry for great literary epics during this time frame.

Thursday, June 01, 2023

Saturdays with the Stars: Yul Brynner

Each month of 2023 we are taking a look at a star who made their name in westerns, rustling cattle & riding horses during the brief time when cowboys ruled Hollywood.  Last month, we focused on the career of Randolph Scott, a stoic leading man who became the unlikely muse of a western maestro.  This month, we're going to focus on one of the most unlikely western stars imaginable, the son of upper class Russian parents who would through an unlikely chain of events, become the toast of Broadway, and eventually an Oscar winner, before spending much of the latter half of his career appearing in westerns.  This month's star is Yul Brynner.

The son of Russian businessmen, young Yul Brynner (born Yully Briner) was born into a great family fortune which was stripped as the Soviet government took over, and his parents lost much of their family fortune.  After his parents divorce, Brynner moved with his mother & sister to China, and then once again fleeing a war, ended up in Paris, where the young Brynner joined a French cabaret company, where he would sing & play his guitar.  A chance meeting with film director Jean Cocteau (allegedly while both he and Brynner, who suffered from drug addiction problems early in his life, were buying opium), introduced the young Brynner to the bohemian scene of Paris at the time, where he became friends with artists like Pablo Picasso & Salvador Dali.  He moved one more time with his mother to New York, where he made the acquaintance of Marlene Dietrich (with whom legend has it he had an affair despite a 19 year age gap between the two), and became an established television director.  

Brynner eventually was coaxed back into acting when the role of a lifetime came across his desk.  Rodgers & Hammerstein had written a musical treatment of Anna and the King of Siam, and he was cast in the titular role as King Mongkut, which would win him a Tony Award and in 1957, an Academy Award for Best Actor.  In 1956, he appeared in three mega-hits, not just The King & I, but also Anastasia and The Ten Commandments.  The combination of these three movies made the distinctive Brynner (one of the first bald leading men, despite the fact that he actually shaved his head rather than being totally bald) one of the most in-demand actors in Hollywood.

Brynner's success was unusual, and relatively short-lived.  Despite a hit in 1958 (The Brothers Karamazov), Brynner would never again equal the success of his work in 1956.  He would, however, become an unusual (given his Russian ancestry and start in Hollywood playing a South Asian king) staple in westerns, including two franchises of the era, The Magnificent Seven and Westworld, both of which would spawn sequels, and in the latter's case, a TV series thirty years after Brynner's death.  This month, we're going to take a look at Brynner's work in these westerns, and talk more about this actor's extraordinary life.

Saturday, September 19, 2020

Solomon and Sheba (1959)

Film: Solomon and Sheba (1959)
Stars: Yul Brynner, Gina Lollobrigida, Marisa Pavan, George Sanders
Director: King Vidor
Oscar History: No nominations
Snap Judgment Ranking: 1/5 stars

Each month, as part of our 2020 Saturdays with the Stars series, we highlight a different actress known as an iconic "film sex symbol."  This month, our focus is on Gina Lollobrigida-click here to learn more about Ms. Lollobrigida (and why I picked her), and click here for other Saturdays with the Stars articles.


In the careers of a lot of beautiful actresses from the late-1940's through the mid-1960's, one of the weirder tropes that seemed to befall these actresses was playing the romantic lead in a biblical epic.  Throughout Saturdays with the Stars, we've already run into this a couple of times.  There was Hedy Lamarr in Samson and Delilah and Virginia Mayo in The Silver Chalice.  Last month, though we didn't profile it, Sophia Loren got to play the female lead in The Fall of the Roman Empire, which while not biblical definitely takes place during the times of the Bible.  And this week Gina Lollobrigida goes into the trope.  The production of Solomon and Sheba is legendary (we'll get into that after we discuss the film) even though that had little to do with Lollobrigida, but suffice it to say this was a big deal in Gina's career, and probably the height of her time as a leading woman in Hollywood (perhaps coincidentally, this was also about the time that her longtime rival Sophia Loren was starting her rise in Tinseltown).

(Spoilers Ahead) The film is a gigantic epic (read: too long) look at only a partial portion of the reign of King Solomon.  The film is loosely based on the Book of Kings in the Bible, which details some sort of relationship between King Solomon (Brynner) and the Queen of Sheba (Lollobrigida), though the Bible is not entirely clear on what that relationship was (and historical evidence of Solomon's reign is scant, and in the case of the Queen of Sheba, bordering on non-existent).  Either way, within this movie they are lovers, though not without their initial problems.  The Queen is recruited by the Pharoah to seduce Solomon, and trick him so that she can gain additional lands, and she does so, but then she falls in love with him.  The Pharoah then persuades Solomon's jealous brother Adonijah (Sanders) to betray him, which he does, but thanks to the prayers of the Queen of Sheba, Solomon is saved from certain defeat, and returns to save her from Adonijah's ordered stoning.

There's a lot more to this movie, but to be honest, that's really the highlights version.  I am not opposed to biblical epics (I love Ben-Hur and consider it a proper masterpiece, and was quite fond of The Ten Commandments), but this movie drags and is SO dull.  The film is famously bad, showing up in "worst films of all-time" lists, and while it's not quite "worst of all time," that's about the closest I'm willing to get to a compliment.  The acting from Brynner, Lollobrigida, and Sanders is super cheesy (and Pavan's saintly sister is really annoying, to the point where you are inappropriately relieved when she dies halfway through the movie), and the script is repetitive & hammy.  This movie was a hit in 1959, even with critics at the time giving it tepid reviews & director Vidor publicly stating that he didn't like Brynner in the lead.

His idea for who should play the lead was Tyrone Power, which gets us to the best story about Solomon and Sheba, because Tyrone Power was supposed to be the lead, and actually filmed large chunks of the movie that were eventually reshot with Brynner.  Looking at news articles at the time, it appears that Power was in the middle of a sword fight with George Sanders (which if the script wasn't changed, this is one of the movie's final scenes), and after doing repeated takes, he complained to Vidor about his left arm hurting.  He then went to his trailer, his makeups artist got him a brandy, and Vidor paged for the studio nurse.  Power was then driven to the hospital by Lollobrigida, but didn't make it-he was pronounced dead when they arrived at the hospital, supposedly still in costume.  While other actors have died in more shocking ways (Martha Mansfield, Brandon Lee, Jon-Eric Hexum), Power is arguably the most famous actor to die on a movie set, a fate that bizarrely also befell his actor father, for whom he was named.  This makes Solomon and Sheba a weird curiosity to modern viewers, even though at the time it was a blockbuster.  Next week, we'll close our month devoted to Gina with her costarring with a different actor whose death (not on a set, but decades after the two starred together) would also become the source of tragic scandal.

Wednesday, June 03, 2020

OVP: Anastasia (1956)

Film: Anastasia (1956)
Stars: Ingrid Bergman, Yul Brynner, Helen Hayes, Akim Tamiroff
Director: Anatole Litvak
Oscar History: 2 nominations/1 win (Best Actress-Ingrid Bergman*, Score)
(Not So) Snap Judgment Ranking: 2/5 stars

As y'all know, I've been doing a bit of cleaning out of my DVR in recent weeks, and I decided on Thursday & Friday evenings that I was in the mood to both clean out the DVR and to watch something familiar to me, so I watched a trio of movies that we'll get to this week that are going to get the rare "Not So" in front of the Snap Judgment Ranking.  This is normally reserved for when I decide to re-watch a movie and put my thoughts for posterity on this blog, and more often it's for movies I've seen a dozen times.  This isn't the case for the films this week.  While I have seen Anastasia, I haven't seen it more than once, and it's been maybe 20 years since I last watched the picture, so while certain scenes of it are firmly in my memory, there are other sequences where I completely had forgotten they'd even existed.  Eventually we'll get to the 1956 OVP, and the main reason I wanted to re-watch this is the odd juxtaposition of my love for Ingrid Bergman (one of my all-time favorite actresses) and the fact that so many of her Oscar-winning roles are "meh" in my memory.  Anastasia was her second trophy, and one that came after a huge hibernation period (where, arguably, she had her most creative acting starring in five films with her then-husband Roberto Rossellini).

(Spoilers Ahead) The film is a highly fictionalized look at the life of Anna Anderson (here called Anna Koreff, but it's impossible to not see this clearly being about Anderson herself).  Anna (Bergman) is a woman who has been in-and-out of mental hospitals, and remembers little about her childhood.  She bares something of a resemblance to what the Grand Duchess Anastasia might have looked like in adulthood, and General Bounine (Brynner) smells an opportunity.  Along with his associate Boris (Tamiroff), they set about to train Anna to become the Grand Duchess, grilling her with facts, but as they continue they start to question if, in fact, she is the Grand Duchess, as she continues to know things that make them question whether or not she's real.  In the end, Anna never truly proves herself to be who she claims she is, but she convinces the Dowager Empress (Hayes), the Grand Duchess's grandmother, that she is her granddaughter, only to then leave her behind, realizing that she's in love with Bounine, and the two run off together, the Dowager Empress content in the knowledge that at least one member of her family is still alive, and now happy.

There's a weird sort of conundrum here.  The mystery of what happened to the Romanovs, and if in fact the youngest princess did escape and survive the Revolution, was one of the great unsolved mysteries of the 20th Century, something we assumed would never be conclusively proven.  This was certainly the case the first time that I saw this movie in the mid-90's.  However, in 2007, DNA testing was done that proved conclusively that the Czar, his wife, and their five children had all died (they found the body of what was assumed to be Anastasia and her brother Alexei, the final missing two, though it's possible that the other body was of Anastasia's sister Maria) were found and proved that this mystery had a rather sad, humdrum ending; there was not, in fact, a little girl out there who was actually a princess & didn't know it, but instead that little girl died during the Russian Revolution.

In some ways this diminishes this film and some of its grandeur.  We know that Anna Anderson wasn't Anastasia, and while you can suspend belief in the film, it takes something away from Bergman's work if you try to keep this grounded in historical accuracy at all.  The performance isn't great-my memory was correct.  She's fine, and regal, and looks great in a dress, and the one scene between she and Hayes where she has to convinced the Grand Duchess that she could in fact be her granddaughter is the best in the movie (random aside, but it's weird that Bergman won here when Hayes, who is better in the movie, didn't even get nominated considering she was staging something of a comeback at the time on the big screen).  But there's not enough beneath the eyes of this character-there's no sense of what Anna actually believes, which feels off to me.  The score, the only other nomination (again-where were the Costume nominations for this movie?!?) is much better, and thankfully doesn't just rely upon Russian cliches to fill out the music.