Showing posts with label James Cameron. Show all posts
Showing posts with label James Cameron. Show all posts

Monday, July 24, 2023

OVP: Picture (2022)

 OVP: Best Picture (2022)

The Nominees Were...


Malte Grunert, All Quiet on the Western Front
James Cameron & Jon Landau, Avatar: The Way of Water
Graham Broadbent, Pete Czernin, & Martin McDonagh, The Banshees of Inisherin
Catherine Martin, Gail Berman, Patrick McCormick, & Schuyler Weiss, Elvis
Daniel Kwan, Daniel Scheinert, & Jonathan Wang, Everything Everywhere All at Once
Kristie Macosko Krieger, Steven Spielberg, & Tony Kushner, The Fabelmans
Todd Field, Alexandra Milchan, & Scott Lambert, Tar
Tom Cruise, Christopher McQuarrie, David Ellison, & Jerry Bruckheimer, Top Gun: Maverick
Erik Hemmendorff & Philippe Bober, Triangle of Sadness
Dede Gardner, Jeremy Kleiner, & Frances McDormand, Women Talking

My Thoughts: We are at the end of yet another season of the Oscar Viewing Project!  This is the quickest turnaround we've ever done from the initial ceremony to the OVP ballot (the Oscars were just a few months ago), so I'm excited we were able to do this within a calendar year.  I'm going to make you wait a little more than week for our next season; we'll kick it off in August, but as a hint we'll be doing one of the two remaining years left this century (for links to past contests, click the bottom of this page).  We'll also be doing one of my favorite series to write on the blog-whom I would've picked if I had picked all of the nominees tomorrow.  But for now, grab the popcorn & get ready for one last ride with Oscar's ten best pictures.  Hopefully the ride goes better than our first film...

Triangle of Sadness is another commentary from Ruben Ostlund about the ways that capitalism & power destroy our combined humanity, and how no one is really exempt from it.  Combining Lina Wertmuller's Swept Away with recent Best Picture winner Parasite, the movie is a fascinating look at a lot of ideas that definitely needs a better editor.  The second third of the movie lasts too long, with Ostlund less trying to aid his tale and more attempting to gross out his audience, but much of the rest of the movie is worth sticking around if you can stomach it, specifically grand performances from Dolly de Leon and Harris Dickinson.  The ending needed to chop the last thirty seconds off of it, though.

Top Gun: Maverick is the antithesis in pretty much every way of Triangle of Sadness, here finding ways to glorify the industrial complex & capitalism.  The movie itself works in key aspects.  Some of the supporting cast (Glen Powell & Jennifer Connelly, specifically) play well, and this is a last great lap of one of the quintessential action heroes, Tom Cruise.  Plus, in a world dominated by CGI, it's thrilling to see actual sets, actual stunts, and not just a wall of computer-generated banality.  But the movie's script lands like a lead balloon, is filled with cliche & the dialogue is cheesy as hell (plus, Jon Hamm continues his weird trend of not knowing how to act in movies after giving one of TV's most iconic characterizations).

Women Talking is that rare film where you say "a film feels like a play" but you mean it is a compliment.  Everything about this is about finding direction through conversation, with us learning more about the complicated world these women live in, but also about the freedom they feel outside of the gaze of men.  I loved the way that your initial assumptions of how these women will progress alters, in the way that new ideas change your mind, and I've never felt claustrophobia used as a framing device (rather than something to overcome) so well.  Sarah Polley's movie is fresh, alive, & full of uncomfortable truths.

All Quiet on the Western Front joins the very short list of movies where both the original and the remake got cited for Best Picture (I believe this is just All Quiet and West Side Story...not a great look for Hollywood originality that both are in the past two years).  The story in this movie is too hard to break entirely-it's one of the most damning anti-war tales ever told-but this one feels paint-by-numbers, and includes a needless addition of Daniel Bruhl reminding us of the ticking clock that we already understand is hanging over these soldiers' heads.  With a remake, I need more than just "it's more realistic" to justify its existence, and this movie never provides that.

Everything Everywhere All at Once is bizarre because my initial review of it on Letterboxd (follow me) is way shorter than I normally would've gone with a Best Picture nominee, which is kind of an indication of how I feel about it (and how out-of-nowhere it felt at the time for the Best Picture race).  I liked it, I didn't love it.  I think that the central performances are all good, but the final third is too convoluted, frequently borrowing from things we've already seen and rarely in a way that feels like it's adding more texture to the story.  It's a miracle that an original movie with no established IP or real-life figure managed to take over the pop culture/box office in such a way, so I give it credit for that...but it's not as original as it needs to be, nor as well as well-edited as it has to be, if we're going to throw around phrases like "masterpiece."

If you want to give out that title for a wholly original movie, you gotta look at a movie like Tar.  The movie is an epic, staggering character study of human nature, and the reasons why we keep things secret.  Cate Blanchett gives the performance of a lifetime (and it's Cate Blanchett we're talking about here, so the lifetime was already on a pedestal) as Lydia Tar, owning every scene of her movie and giving us a domineering, complicated, over-her-head woman that defies expectations.  One of those movies you only truly understand once you've seen every second of it.

I'm always a sucker for an "ode to cinema" and the past couple of years have given us high-profile takes from major directors.  2022's best was The Fabelmans, which gives Steven Spielberg the vulnerability to share not just where he came from, but where some of his best movies came from.  Within The Fabelmans, we get a sense of the prickliness that we see in so many of his movies (for all of the "happy ending" criticism that Spielberg gets, so often the children in his films are from "broken" or divorced homes, just like Sammy here).  Solid performances from Williams, LaBelle, & Dano help to underline the central dynamic of a father-and-mother's love being so crucial to a young man finding himself.

I have been so sick of musical biopics (by far the most tired & overdone genre in movies today) that I kind of forgot that they could have some thrills.  Leave it to Baz Luhrmann to get me there with Elvis.  This movie doesn't always work in its approach-the length (oddly enough) is fine, but it glosses over side characters too much (particularly Presley's wife Priscilla), to the point where it makes the editing feel choppy.  And I don't entirely get what Tom Hanks was doing here, even if there are times it kind of works (bad acting can have its place in a movie, though that is what this is).  But casting Austin Butler as this unknowable sex god is so appropriate and so inline with Elvis, you might believe at some points that that electric magnetism has been brought back from the dead.

An even more successful spin on a tried-and-true genre (the buddy comedy) is The Banshees of Inisherin.  The best parts of Martin McDonagh's films are when he gives us sharp edges on his characters, which we get as the film goes-the central four characters are all imperfect, and sometimes that imperfection has consequences they can't take back.  Buoyed by the best acting ensemble of 2022, the writing & acting are so heightened and extraordinary it's hard not to feel you're in the presence of some great, untold tale.  I loved it.

With Hollywood telling more and more stories that we've already heard, an increase in sequels in this category is inevitable.  If that's the case, please make them all as good as Avatar: The Way of Water.  I had honestly forgotten a blockbuster movie could look this good, with James Cameron genuinely caring about light & design in his film rather than piecing together action set pieces with no care in-between.  The story itself is strong, particularly the way that he folds it into a thrilling action sequence over the film's last 40 minutes (you will not look at your watch once in this very long movie), but it's the glorious visual effects that make this something truly special.

Other Precursor Contenders: The Globes separate their categories into Drama and Musical/Comedy so we have ten films to discuss, but in a different style than Oscar's ten.  Best Musical/Comedy went to The Banshees of Inisherin against Babylon, Everything Everywhere All at Once, Glass Onion, and Triangle of Sadness while The Fabelmans bested Avatar: The Way of Water, Elvis, Tar, and Top Gun: Maverick in Best Drama.  The PGA Awards gave their statue to Everything Everywhere All at Once beating most of the Oscar lineup with Women Talking, All Quiet on the Western Front, & Triangle of Sadness replaced by Black Panther: Wakanda Forever, Glass Onion, & The Whale.  BAFTA only does five nominees, and picked All Quiet on the Western Front against Banshees, EEAAO, Elvis, & Tar.  In eleventh place...I think it was probably The Whale given it won two major awards and got the PGA nod.  I maintain that had Glass Onion (a populist hit if you've ever seen one) gotten a real run in theaters and not just a "quick, get it onto Netflix" it would've gotten a nomination here the second it hit $100 million at the box office.  Streaming, I cannot stress this enough, is ruining the entertainment industry.
Films I Would Have Nominated: You'll find out tomorrow!
Oscar’s Choice: An easy call for EEAAO-BAFTA & the HFPA were doing their own things (which I love) but by Oscar night, it was evident that EEAAO was taking this over All Quiet and The Fabelmans.
My Choice: Comparing films is insane, and that's very much proven by my top two films, Avatar: The Way of Water and The Banshees of Inisherin, two superb movies that have nothing in common.  I started this article ranking Banshees first because the acting & story is a bit better, and I'll stay there, but this is one of those decisions I'll waffle about forever.  Behind them (in order) I'd go: The Fabelmans, Tar, Women Talking, Triangle of Sadness, Everything Everywhere All at Once, Elvis, Top Gun: Maverick, and All Quiet on the Western Front.

And there you have it-another OVP in the books.  Are you staying with Oscar's bandwagon love of EEAAO or do you want to hang with Jenny the Donkey & I over with Banshees?  Do you think The Whale, Glass Onion, or something else was just out of this contest?  And overall-what is your favorite movie of 2022?  Share your comments below!


Past Best Picture Contests: 2002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020, 2021

Monday, January 23, 2023

My Top 10 Movies of 2022

2022 has been over for a few weeks, and tomorrow for film fans it will find its extension.  It's rare I get to do this literally on the day before the Oscars, but this year, it's going to happen.  I don't usually rank the films in this lineup until we get to the OVP, but below is my annual (alphabetical)  list of the Top 10 films of 2022, according to me.  These are personal preference, and inevitably I haven't seen all of the movies of 2022, but I will say I got to a lot (and that I had a great time in cinemas this year-this is a list I'm very happy with).


Aftersun
dir. Charlotte Wells

A look at the way we can never totally understand our parents, the scars they leave behind, and the ones that they left us with.  This is a grand acting duet, and another testament to the rare emerging talent that is Paul Mescal.


Avatar: The Way of Water
dir. James Cameron

Cameron took 13 years to get us back to Pandora, but man was it worth the wait.  Visually so impressive you can't believe we've been indulging Marvel as a "VFX titan" for the past decade, it's all a vision, particularly that gargantuan final hour where you can barely breathe it's so well-staged.


The Banshees of Inisherin
dir. Martin McDonagh

McDonagh reunites his In Bruges leading men with equal flare.  The thing about Banshees that I'm struck by is not just the fine writing & acting, but the insight.  The way that lonely people are willing to give so much to excuse their loneliness, and the social pacts we make to keep life worthwhile, and what happens when someone doesn't honor them.


The Bob's Burgers Movie
dir. Loren Bouchard & Bernard Derriman

I watch Bob's Burgers pretty much every day, so this film was playing with a loaded deck I love it so much.  But that doesn't mean it doesn't have something fun to say.  From a splendid opening act number to in-depth looks at our characters (specifically Bob & Louise), we get a spiritual sequel to the equally heartwarming Simpsons Movie fifteen years ago.


Decision to Leave
dir. Park Chan-Wook

Beautiful noir piece about the shifting lens of reality and postulation.  Two astounding lead performances from Park Hae-Il and Tang Wei (back in front of a movie camera where she belongs), with an ending even Hitchcock would've been proud of for the way it ambitiously leaves the film on a coda.


The Fabelmans
dir. Steven Spielberg

I'm not tired of "odes to cinema" but given the box office I'd be fine if this was the capper on the genre for a while.  The way the movie is not about a sentimental Spielberg family drama, but instead about the prickliness we find when we reexamine our own origin stories...I love the way he portrays his parents as humans, loving but with true, difficult faults.


Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery
dir. Rian Johnson

The most fun I had all year at a movie theater.  Johnson takes the best parts of Knives Out, and gives us a far compacter, tighter story by trimming the fat.  Made for the movies (why is this on Netflix?), it's so funny & sharp and Johnson somehow predicted the future with that ending.


Nope
dir. Jordan Peele

Peele continues to be one of the most remarkable voices in cinema after his breakout six years ago.  Here, he combines the horror genre with the western, giving us as much an homage to The Misfits as we get to Tremors or It Came From Outer Space.  Those final twenty minutes rocked my world-just a beautiful movie.


Tar
dir. Todd Field

Cate Blanchett finds her Daniel Plainview as Lydia Tar, a fictional (or is she?) figure at the top of her field, but also a potential predator who is about to eat her own hubris.  Chilling, filmed as if it's a horror film, Todd Field's long absence from the screen feels worthy of this comeback.


Women Talking
dir. Sarah Polley

Sarah Polley lenses this movie as almost a claustrophobic play, an unrelenting kaleidoscope of women, freed from the binds of the male gaze, discussing that gaze and the ramifications that it has had on their lives.  Powerhouse performances all around, but most crucially, chemistry from these women who have the difficult job of showing evolution within what seems like what long take.

Wednesday, May 20, 2020

OVP: Aliens (1986)

Film: Aliens (1986)
Stars: Sigourney Weaver, Michael Biehn, Paul Reiser, Lance Henriksen, Bill Paxton
Director: James Cameron
Oscar History: 7 nominations/2 wins (Best Actress-Sigourney Weaver, Art Direction, Film Editing, Original Score, Sound, Sound Effects Editing*, Visual Effects*)
Snap Judgment Ranking: 4/5 stars

This week we are randomly taking a look at Best Actress nominees from films I'd never seen before and am catching for the first time on quarantine (if you follow this blog more for politics, I'm aware we've been a little film heavy lately but know that I'm going to be restoring balance next week once my life settles down a bit more-the past two weeks have been a challenge and I'd already committed to this mini-project, and want to ensure I finish it but I'll be back in election analysis quite soon).  Today we go in a truly different direction entirely from our previous entries of a mother-daughter melodrama and a romantic Technicolor epic into a 1980's action blockbuster, one of the only films of this nature to actually secure a Best Actress nomination.  Women like Charlize Theron and Linda Hamilton have gotten some buzz for Oscar for action films, but it's extremely rare to get a citation like what Sigourney Weaver secured in 1986, and it was for her first round with Oscar (unlike someone like Sandra Bullock in Gravity, who was already AMPAS-blessed).  In order to get this kind of nomination, you have to be extraordinary, so I was pumped to finally catch this movie.

(Spoilers Ahead) The film is a follow-up to the 1979 film Alien, which I had seen many years ago but re-watched in anticipation of this particular picture (are Weaver and Ingrid Bergman in The Bells of St. Mary's the only two women who have been nominated for Best Actress for a sequel?).  The film shows Ripley, 57 years later (but in some form of stasis), being rescued after being the only people to survive the last attack.  She is convinced to go back to the colony of the alien attacks under the condition that they kill the aliens.  Once they arrive, though, it turns out that one of the crew members, Burke (Reiser) has been instructed to bring back the aliens at all cost, even if that means killing or impregnating some of his crew (specifically Ripley).  The aliens, of course, have other ideas, and we witness multiple different standoffs between the depleting human population and the aliens, including a particularly amazing sequence between Ripley and the alien queen (which encompasses Weaver's legendary line reading of "Get away from her, you bitch!").

Aliens doesn't really break a lot of new story ground.  Forgetting for a second that this is largely a retelling of the original movie, this is also a story that has been done repeatedly since the dawn of Science Fiction in movies.  But like most of James Cameron's films, it's not the story that you're coming for-it's the picture itself.  In a way that almost no other filmmaker can, Cameron can take the most basic of filmic readings and make them feel fresh, new, and inventive.  He does that with Aliens, better than its predecessor in virtually every way.

For starters, there's Weaver, who feels more confident in her Ripley.  She doesn't play her as an action hero (at least not until the very end), but instead as someone who wasn't intended for this life, but has learned from it.  So often with action-adventure sequels, they forget that the original person wasn't meant to be a superhero, and that one or two experiences isn't going to turn them into one (I'm not going to call out which franchise I'm subtweeting here, but I'm sure one came to mind).  As a result, this is still a performance, one that is well-felt and coming with some much-needed nuance.

The other Oscar categories were equally well-deserved (honestly, even though it gained a hefty 7 nominations, that feels a bit light from my perspective).  The Visual Effects are groundbreaking and game-changing, still impressive-looking some thirty years after-the-fact.  The sound work is marvelous; Cameron used the sound effects to keep us tense even when we shouldn't be, employing jump scares with caution & skill, but also genuine terror through the battles and alien cries.  The same can be said for the swiftness of the editing-the film doesn't feel rushed, but it also rarely skimps on the action.  The sets are so strong they became prototypical not just for the copycat films that would follow, but also what we'd see in movies like Gravity and Ad Astra decades in the future.  About the only nomination I might raise an eyebrow over is the score, but even there it's more James Horner being taken for granted (and using similar motifs to most of his other work) than it being bad.  All-in-all, Aliens is a terrific experience, and proof that Oscar should think outside-the-box more often, as it pays off with a classic performance being included in his annals.

Saturday, September 20, 2014

Oscar and the Box Office

For as long as I have been watching the Academy Awards, there has been complaints about how "they don't nominate the movies people actually see," and I have always scoffed at this for a couple of reasons.  For starters, Oscar does frequently have categories (many times including Best Picture) that do honor the films that people line up around the block to get tickets to, and I always have examples each year of a celebrated film that will score big with AMPAS.  Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, the Oscars could be a lot more esoteric: look at the (oftentimes very worthy) nominations of the Independent Spirit Awards and there are many times that the Spirit nominations could be more worthy than what's going on with AMPAS.  Still, though, this argument isn't enough for some people, so I decided to go and see: am I right or are they (or, as I suspect will eventually be proven, perhaps we both are, as is the case in so many debates?)

Going back to 1980 (because that's when Box Office Mojo goes back to domestically), I took a look at what the highest-grossing films of the year were as well as where the Best Picture lineup stood with the Box Office.  Let's start the popcorn and begin:

1980

Highest-Grossing Film: Coming off of the initial Star Wars hit three years earlier, it was of little doubt that The Empire Strikes Back would be a major force, earning double that of second place 9 to 5 (yes, a film starring three women in a workplace comedy was the second-highest grossing film of the year-unfathomable in a marketplace that now seems entirely geared toward movies for teenage boys).  Despite being the best of the trilogy, Empire didn't score the Best Picture nomination its predecessor did, but it did get a very respectable three nominations (winning for Best Sound), as well as a special award for Visual Effects.
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?:  Yes-Coal Miner's Daughter was the seventh-highest grossing Best Picture nominee of the year, just out-earning Smokey and the Bandit II.
Where's the Winner?: Ordinary People, the eventual winner, was the eleventh-highest grossing film.

1981

Highest-Grossing Film: Continuing the utter dominance that George Lucas and Steven Spielberg once had on the Box Office, Raiders of the Lost Ark clobbered the competition in 1981.  It also dominated with AMPAS, winning four Oscars (Art Direction, Sound, Film Editing, and a special awards for Visual Effects) and seven nominations (including ones for Best Picture and Director).
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: In addition to Raiders, we had On Golden Pond (#2) and Best Picture winner Chariots of Fire (#7) in the Top 10 for the year.


1982

Highest-Grossing Film: E.T.: the Extra-Terrestrial became the highest-grossing film of all-time in 1982, in a year that relied pretty heavily on sequels.  Like Raiders, E.T. scored another pair of nominations for Best Picture and Director (yet again, Spielberg was involved), and won four Oscars (Sound, Visual Effects, Sound Effects Editing, and Original Score).
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: Once again, the highest-grossing film of the year was a Best Picture nominee.  It was joined by the year's number two film, Tootsie.
Where's the Winner?: The Best Picture winner was at #12 that year, with Gandhi just missing the Top 10.

1983

Highest-Grossing Film: Yet again we have the Lucas/Spielberg machine giving us the top-grosser, the final of the original Star Wars trilogy: Return of the Jedi.  The film won one Oscar (again, for Visual Effects), while scoring four more nominations.
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: Absolutely-the Best Picture winner, in fact.  Terms of Endearment was the second highest-grossing film of the year, a monster hit for Paramount and one of the biggest of Shirley MacLaine and Jack Nicholson's careers.

1984

Highest-Grossing Film: For the first time we get a film not connected to Spielberg or Lucas (but instead to that other Box Office titan Jerry Bruckheimer): Beverly Hills Cop.  This is also the first film to not have won an Oscar but to top the Box Office, getting instead just a nomination for Best Original Screenplay.
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: This is also our first year without a Best Picture nominee making the Top 10.  The highest-grossing Best Picture nominee of the year was Amadeus at Number 12 (it won the Oscar).  One has to assume that if this were ten-wide some Top 10 hits like Ghostbusters (#2), The Karate Kid (#5), or Romancing the Stone (#8) would have been a part of the conversation.

1985

Highest-Grossing Film: We are back to the top-grossing film of the year being an Oscar-winner, with Back to the Future scoring Best Sound Effects Editing, and getting another three nominations (including Best Screenplay, meaning that in a ten-wide field it may have been a nominee for the top prize as well).
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: A huge bounce back from the previous year, three Best Picture nominees were in the Top 10: The Color Purple (#4, and yes that Spielberg magic touch worked once again here), Out of Africa (#5, and the eventual champ), and Witness (#8, proving that Harrison Ford was once the greatest Box Office champ of them all).

1986

Highest-Grossing Film: Of course Ford would soon have competition from one toothy-grinned boy from Syracuse named Tom Cruise, as Top Gun became the mammoth hit of 1986.  The film won four Oscar nominations, winning one (for Best Original Song, and admit it, you just started slow-dancing in your head).
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: The third-highest grossing film of the year was also the Best Picture winner, as Platoon became the only nominee to crack the top ten.

1987

Highest-Grossing Film: Easily the weirdest film to ever top the Box Office, Three Men and a Baby beat more obvious champs like Fatal Attraction and Beverly Hills Cop II to become the highest-grossing movie of 1987.  The Leonard Nimoy-directed hit (yes, Spock directed this movie!) didn't score any Oscar nominations (or any Globe nods, stunningly enough), making it our first top grosser to completely be overlooked by AMPAS.
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: The rest of the Top Ten was pretty kind to the Best Picture lineup, with Fatal Attraction (#2) and Moonstruck (#5) both appearing in the Top 10 alongside likely near-misses The Untouchables (#6) and Good Morning, Vietnam (#4).
Where's the Winner?: Bernardo Bertolucci's epic The Last Emperor became the lowest-ranking Best Picture winner so far by landing #25 on the year-end Box Office charts.

1988

Highest-Grossing Film: After the doldrums of the previous year for AMPAS and the Box Office, we had a complete turnaround, as for the first time in our count, the Best Picture winner became the highest-grossing film of the year: Rain Man.  Winner of four Oscars (it also took Directing, Writing, and Best Actor honors), it just aided the "Tom Cruise is the touch of gold" truth of that period of movie-watching.
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: Of course it did with Rain Man, though that was the only Best Picture nominee in the Top 10 (Working Girl just missed, coming in eleventh).

1989

Highest-Grossing Film: In the first of many comic book movies to top the Box Office, Batman took out Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade at the Box Office.  Batman was outmanned by Indy at the Oscars, however, with the former only getting one nomination (for Art Direction, which it won), while the latter nabbed three nods and a win.
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: Two did, actually: both the eventual Best Picture winner Driving Miss Daisy (#8, a massive hit and yet another non special effects film in the Top 10-unthinkable these days) and Dead Poets Society (#10).

1990

Highest-Grossing Film: This was during that brief period where America couldn't get enough of the spritely Macauley Culkin, as he conquered the Box Office (and two Oscar nominations for Song and Score) in Home Alone.
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: Right behind Home Alone, however, were two Best Picture nominees: Ghost (one of those nominations that seems to have been basically mandated by the American public, and would probably feel like a "Top 10" nomination now were it not for clear proof it was in the Top 5) and eventual victor Dances with Wolves.

1991

Highest-Grossing Film: 1990 was pretty much the end of the "no special effects, no animation" period of the Box Office champs, as Terminator 2: Judgment Day took the top spot at the Box Office (anyone think we might be about to see Arnold Schwarzenegger start to pick up some lifetime achievement awards soon?).  T2 was a huge Oscar hit, however, and picked up six nods and four wins (Sound, Makeup, Sound Effects Editing, and of course Visual Effects).
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: Beauty and the Beast (#3) was not only a bona fide smash hit, but it also was the first animated film to receive an Oscar nomination for Best Picture (it'd be another eighteen years before it happened again with Up).  The Oscar champ Silence of the Lambs was right behind it in fourth.

1992

Highest-Grossing Film: Aladdin couldn't quite pull off the same nomination the year after, but it moved Disney up two slots on the Box Office charts and pulled off number one (it won two Oscars, for Best Song and Best Score, as well as three more nominations).
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: With Demi Moore, Jack Nicholson, and Tom Cruise in the cast (and being that it was 1992) there was no way A Few Good Men wasn't a hit-the film hit #5 on the charts.
Where's the Winner?: Clint Eastwood's magnum opus Unforgiven was just out of reach of the Top 10, landing at Number Eleven.

1993

Highest-Grossing Film: In the year of Spielberg, Jurassic Park was clobbering the competition in first place, earning over $100 million more than second place Mrs. Doubtfire.  Jurassic Park won on all three of its nominations: Sound, Sound Effects Editing, and Visual Effects (which still look incredible-this was a really worthy citation).
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: It's hard to fathom that an historical epic could actually make the Top Ten now, but everyone wanted to see eventual Oscar-night champ Schindler's List, which ended up in ninth place, a bit behind fellow Best Picture nominee The Fugitive (#3).

1994

Highest-Grossing Film: For the first time in six years, the Box Office champion was also the Best Picture of the year: Forrest Gump pulled off thirteen nominations and won six trophies (Picture, Director, Actor, Screenplay, Editing, and Visual Effects).
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: In addition to Gump, Quentin Tarantino's masterwork Pulp Fiction was also in the Top Ten, coming in at the very last slot with tenth.

1995

Highest-Grossing Film: In what was at the time a pretty close battle, Toy Story ended up the victor at the Box Office.  At the time there was buzz that the landmark film (the first full-length computer-animated film) would get a Best Picture nomination, but it had to settle for three nominations (Screenplay, Song, and Score) as well as a special award for John Lasseter.
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: Just one this year, thanks to the massive star power of Tom Hanks audiences everywhere enjoyed Apollo 13, which came in second to Toy Story that year at the Box Office.
Where's the Winner?: Braveheart was a bit of a surprise winner on Oscar night, and was a modest hit at 18th place on the charts.

1996

Highest-Grossing Film: One of those summer's that truly felt made by blockbusters, we had the $300 million Independence Day dominating theaters everywhere (and making Will Smith's permanent mark on the Fourth of July going forward).  The film won one Oscar (Visual Effects) and one more nomination (Best Sound).
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: We're getting to the point where this becomes a bit more reliant on special effects to even make the Top Ten, but we're not quite there yet: Tom Cruise's magnetism in Jerry Maguire got it 4th place that year.
Where's the Winner?: The English Patient may have been part of the "Year of the Indy" but it still made 19th place.

1997

Highest-Grossing Film: Titanic went on to become the highest-grossing film of all-time (people saw it countless times in theaters: I hit five if you count the re-release), scored the Best Picture trophy, and won on eleven of its fourteen nominations.
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: Both As Good As It Gets (#6) and Good Will Hunting (#7) joined Titanic, proving that if given the chance adults will buy tickets at the movies as well.

1998

Highest-Grossing Film: I genuinely forgot that this happened, but Saving Private Ryan actually topped Armageddon in the year-end Box Office, meaning that the 5-time Oscar winner (including Best Director, but famously not Best Picture) is our highest-grossing film of 1998.
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: Aside from SPR, this was a negatory.  The rest of the Top 10 (with films like The Waterboy, Godzilla, and Patch Adams) is a pretty solid embarrassment.
Where's the Winner?: Shakespeare in Love did cross the $100 million mark, but that was only good enough for 18th place.

1999

Highest-Grossing Film: The grand-daddy of the franchise reboots, Star Wars-The Phantom Menace was insanely popular at the Box Office (crossing $400 million domestically, a number that would top the Box Office in most years) and scored three Oscar nods (the blockbuster Holy Trinity of Sound, Sound Effects Editing, and Visual Effects, all of which it lost to The Matrix).
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: Why yes, yes it did.  The Sixth Sense (another movie many people saw multiple times in theaters-that's your ticket, Hollywood-start making films people want to see multiple times again!) was a surprise hit and brought on a Best Picture nomination after its second place finish (it also brought us Lady in the Water, but let's try and forget about that).
Where's the Winner?: American Beauty was also a smash, landing at 13th place with $130 million.

2000

Highest-Grossing Film: Ugh-this is the year The Grinch made it to the top of the Box Office, proving sometimes we all can get it completely wrong (at least we all knew it-does anyone watch this movie anymore?).  The film did score three nominations (winning for Best Makeup), but let's all agree to never speak of it again (unfortunately until we get to the 2000 OVP) and just watch the Boris Karloff classic instead.
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: 2000 was one of the tightest Best Picture races I have ever seen, but the ultimate victor was Box Office hit Gladiator, which came in at Number 4 on the charts.

2001

Highest-Grossing Film: Setting off a series that would spawn eight Top 10 hits on the Box Office charts (...and counting), Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone got the top spot by just $4 million over the silver medalist The Fellowship of the Ring.  The movie scored three nominations (Costume, Art Direction, and Score) but no wins.
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: As I've just mentioned, The Fellowship of the Ring was in second place, and crushed the boy wizard in terms of AMPAS, scoring a Best Picture nod amongst its thirteen nominations.
Where's the Winner?: Just outside the Top Ten at Number eleven (for the curious, that would be Ron Howard's schmaltzy A Beautiful Mind, the worst of the five films in contention that year).

2002

Highest-Grossing Film: Was it Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, or Harry Potter that came out on top in the only year that has ever featured all three against each other?  It was actually D, none-of-the-above.  Instead it was Spider-Man, the original non-Andrew Garfield version that swung up $400 million and two nominations (Sound and Visual Effects, though it won neither).
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: There were two, actually-Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers hit second place again for the franchise, while Best Picture victor Chicago snuck in at tenth place at the Box Office.

2003

Highest-Grossing Film: In the last time this has happened (to date), The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King won both the Box Office crown and the Best Picture trophy, along with ten other Oscars.
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: There were no other nominees in the Top Ten other than Return of the King (Finding Nemo was in second place and that was probably pretty close).  The next highest-grossing picture was Seabiscuit at Number 17.

2004

Highest-Grossing Film: We're back to animated features again, with Shrek 2 (still one of the highest-grossing films of all-time, and probably the one that people talk about the least in that list) getting $440 million at the Box Office and a pair of Oscar nominations (Song and Animated Feature Film...it lost both).
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: For the first time in twenty years, none of the Top 10 highest-grossing films scored a Best Picture nomination.  The highest-grossing would be The Aviator at No. 22.
Where's the Winner?: Coming in just behind The Aviator (as opposed to just ahead like on Oscar night), Million Dollar Baby was at No. 24 with a nice $100 million to boast of.

2005

Highest-Grossing Film: We were back in the world of George Lucas again, as Revenge of the Sith hit the number one slot once more (Attack of the Klones is noteworthy for being the only one of the six films to not dominate the Number One slot for its year, an astounding achievement for the series).  Sadly for Lucas, the film received only one nomination for Best Makeup, and say what you will about the film, but I think it's pretty idiotic that it got snubbed for Best Visual Effects that year in favor of The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe.
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: 2004 actually kicked off what would be one of the longest-stretches (probably THE longest stretch) of years where AMPAS didn't pick a film in the year's Top 10.  So no, with King Kong missing out on a nomination (the only film that had a remote shot at the top category), the highest-grossing Best Pic nominee was oddly Brokeback Mountain at No. 22.
Where's the Winner?: Sadly Brokeback wasn't the winner, and instead it was Crash, which rose to No. 49.

2006

Highest-Grossing Film: For a brief period in the mid-Aughts we would buy a ticket to everything that Johnny Depp was in-this has since passed (as has any interest from Depp in playing a normal human being again), but that was enough for Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest to hit the Numero Uno slot (and to win Best Visual Effects amidst a set of four Oscar nominations).
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: Once again we get a no, with Best Picture winner The Departed getting the closest with a respectable 15th place.  It's worth noting that in a ten-wide field Casino Royale (which was 9th) may well have made it onto the roster.

2007

Highest-Grossing Film: Once again we have Tobey Maguire swinging into Number One, and for only the second time in this write-up, we have a film that couldn't get a single Oscar nomination.  One imagines that it probably would have landed a nomination in a five-wide field for Visual Effects (we were still a couple of years away from that happening), but you would be wrong-the film made the shortlist (Visual Effects at that time had a shortlist of 15 films, then would corner it down to seven for the bake-off before selecting three) but not the bake-off, with 300, I Am Legend, Evan Almighty, and The Bourne Ultimatum all making it to the "just miss" category (all but Evan Almighty made the year's Top 10, and all but The Bourne Ultimatum would go home without an Oscar nomination).
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: No, though in a ten-wide field surely The Bourne Ultimatum would have been a threat.  Still, this is one of the finest Best Picture fields that Oscar ever assembled, so I don't think anyone should be complaining (the highest-grossing was Juno at 15th).
Where's the Winner?: No Country for Old Men came in at 36th, getting just shy of $75 million.

2008

Highest-Grossing Film: So much has been written about how The Dark Knight (in my opinion still the high mark of the superhero genre) didn't get a Best Picture nomination, likely causing the jumbled mess of nominees we see today, but let's be honest here: it clearly just missed and it was amply rewarded; most films would kill to score eight nominations and win two (Supporting Actor and Sound Editing).
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: No, though the streak will soon be over.  We did have near misses in The Dark Knight and WALL-E at the top of the list, though, so this was almost a resounding yes.  The highest-grossing ended up being the winner Slumdog Millionaire (coming in at #16).

2009

Highest-Grossing Film: Once again the highest-grossing film (ever, in this case) managed to top Oscar's charts with Avatar scoring a Best Picture nod amongst its nine nominations (it won three: Visual Effects, Cinematography, and Art Direction).  This is also the third time James Cameron has directed the highest-grossing film of the year, an impressive stat for a man who makes films about once every decade.
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: Aside from Avatar, we also had Up (#5) and The Blind Side (#8), the latter of which is a rare throwback to when the Box Office was driven by domestic dramas.
Where's the Winner?: The lowest-ranking film we'll chart, The Hurt Locker is the best example on this list of a film that no one saw winning a ton of Oscars: it ranked #116 on the year-end Box Office charts, being out-earned by all but two of its competitors.  It's had a solid life on DVD/streaming, however.

2010

Highest-Grossing Film: Continuing our streak, Toy Story 3 managed to land $400 million and a Best Picture nomination when it topped the charts four years ago.  The film won five nominations, winning for two of them (Best Animated Feature and Best Original Song).
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: In addition to TS3, we also had Inception at Number 6 on the charts.
Where's the Winner?: Despite being a non-effects driven drama, The King's Speech made up for a lot of lost time over The Hurt Locker, getting $135 million and 18th place.

2011

Highest-Grossing Film: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 became the second film in the series to nab the top spot, but like all of the films in the series, it missed both for Best Picture and for an actual trophy (it still feels wrong that Harry Potter never won an Oscar, though as the OVP has been revealing so far, I'd likely do the same thing, though I admittedly have a few years left of nominations to suss through).  This installment got three Oscar nominations, though, for Makeup, Visual Effects, and Art Direction.
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: No, it did not-the closest that any nominee got in this extremely franchise heavy list (seriously-every film in the Top 10 was part of a franchise) was The Help at #13.
Where's the Winner?: The Artist hit 71st on the list right between two films I think almost all of us would be hard-pressed to mention the stars of (Hall Pass and Soul Surfer, for the record, proving that Box Office frequently means diddily to the public's memory).

2012

Highest-Grossing Film: Reigniting the trend of comic book movies topping the list, Marvel's The Avengers clobbered the competition and hit $623 million.  They did not, however, get an Oscar win or a Best Picture nod, instead settling for a sole nomination for Visual Effects (which quite frankly the film didn't deserve).
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: Nope once again, though Skyfall and Brave both were close and they were in the Top 10.  It's worth noting that six of the Best Picture nominees crossed the $100 million mark, so it's not like this wasn't a pretty populist year.  Lincoln ended up being the surprise hit of 2012 (Spielberg-what can I say?) and landed 13th, making it the highest-grossing Best Picture nominee.
Where's the Winner?: Argo wasn't too far behind, making it to Number 22.

2013

Highest-Grossing Film: The Hunger Games: Catching Fire won everyone's favorite movie star Jennifer Lawrence the top spot to go along with her many other accolades.  That said, this is the third film on this list to not score an Oscar nod, and considering there are two more films in the series guaranteed to be major successes, this may be a weird streak coming into 2014.
Did a Best Picture Nominee Make the Top Ten?: Absolutely-Gravity landed No. 6 on the list, proving once again that Sandra Bullock is a Box Office powerhouse.
Where's the Winner?: 12 Years a Slave managed to land Number 62 on the year-end list, making over $50 million.

And there you have it-a comprehensive look at the many, many films that made up the Box Office and the Oscars.  Overall, while I kind of see the point of those who claim that the Best Picture race isn't remotely reflective of the Box Office, I have to say that I still feel pretty right.  Almost all of the films that topped the Box Office got at least an Oscar nomination, and almost every year had major hits nominated in the Best Picture race.  And not to chastise, but if we were a bit more discerning in what movies we were throwing our money at (The Waterboy, really?), AMPAS might better reflect public tastes.

Those are my thoughts-what are yours?  Are there any surprises on this list?  Are there any films that should have gotten more/less attention from AMPAS that were Box Office powerhouses?  Share in the comments!