Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Sec. of State Alison Lundergan Grimes (D-KY) |
And yet, on June 29th, Lundergan Grimes had an
equally puzzling partner on the campaign trail: Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth
Warren. Lundergan Grimes has been
campaigning with Bill Clinton (a popular former president with a similar twang
to Lundergan Grimes on the campaign trail), and I wouldn’t have been stunned to
see Warren (a powerhouse fundraiser) giving money to Lundergan Grimes, but out
in the open campaigning? With the
press right there? How is this
possible?
Elizabeth Warren is one of the most liberal senators in the
country, and has an environmental record and track record of support for President
Obama that would make Republicans in Kentucky giddy, so what was the benefit of
Lundergan Grimes going out on the campaign trail with her? This isn’t Bill Clinton, where the
liberal views can be masked by a southern accent and legendary retail politicking skills
(not to mention the fact that he did win Kentucky when he ran for
president…twice). Elizabeth Warren
is a Massachusetts senator, has fairly low name recognition outside of political
and liberal circles, and has a voting record that Lundergan Grimes would like
to avoid like the plague.
And yet this isn’t a risk that Lundergan Grimes is only
taking. Warren will be out of the
trail later this month for Natalie Tennant in West Virginia and has backed Rick
Weiland in South Dakota, Michelle Nunn in Georgia, and Mark Pryor in Arkansas. In fact, while she hasn’t been on the
trail for all of them, Elizabeth Warren has donated to 28 candidates this year,
including every one of her vulnerable colleagues.
The fascinating thing about this campaigning is that Warren
has been able to do something almost no one else has been able to do while
campaigning: create nuance. While
if President Obama or Mitt Romney get out on the trail for a Republican or
Democrat it is politically toxic if the demographics of that area didn’t vote
for them for President, Warren has smartly made distinctions between her voting record and
those of Lundergan Grimes. When
campaigning for Natalie Tennant, Warren’s campaign issued this statement,
“Natalie and I don’t agree on every issue. For example, she has made clear to me that she will fight
against EPA regulations that I support if she believes it means protecting coal
jobs in West Virginia.”
That is probably one of the most well-worded explanations
I’ve seen in a while in politics-succinct, and complimentary to both Warren
(who gets to keep her liberal credentials in the Bay State and potentially with 2016 primary voters) and Tennant (who gets to look bipartisan and still gain the endorsement
of both coal miners and Warren).
The Republicans have attacked, but the retorts from Tennant and
Lundergan Grimes are hard to argue with, particularly since Warren’s message
she’s championing on the campaign trail is extremely popular with their constituencies.
That message is the anti-Wall Street, pro-regulation
campaign that Warren has become known for, gaining the title of consumer
advocate at a time when that title couldn’t be more popular with middle and lower income voters. Warren has credentials that are
unimpeachable when it comes to being an advocate for economic populism, and in
particular her work on behalf of people with student loans plays extremely well
across middle America. Her student loan bill (which would have
provided interest rate relief in exchange for closing tax loopholes on higher
earners) died in a filibuster, but is the sort of bill that Democrats in
Arkansas, North Carolina, Kentucky, West Virginia, and Louisiana can support
without any repercussions from their base or swing voters-in fact it attracts
them in equal measure.
No comments:
Post a Comment