Showing posts with label Heath Ledger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Heath Ledger. Show all posts

Thursday, September 03, 2020

OVP: Actor (2005)

OVP: Best Actor (2005)

The Nominees Were...


Philip Seymour Hoffman, Capote
Terrence Howard, Hustle & Flow
Heath Ledger, Brokeback Mountain
Joaquin Phoenix, Walk the Line
David Strathairn, Good Night, and Good Luck

My Thoughts: It's pretty rare to have a Best Actor field with no former winners, and even rarer to have one with only one previous nominee, but that's what we get in 2005.  The average age of these actors was only 37.6 at the time, making this possibly the youngest average field of this millennium (I've never done the full math, though that does sound like something I'll probably do at some point, but an average under 40 is spritely for lead actor). The tragedy, of course, is that two of these men are already gone, including the youngest of the bunch, Heath Ledger, who is where we'll start this writeup.

Ledger always had a charm in his films, especially in earlier work like 10 Things I Hate About You or A Knight's Tale, but while I think some might have suspected Jake Gyllenhaal would turn a triumph at some point, assuming Heath Ledger would was at one point a question mark.  Ledger's work in Brokeback, though, is seismic and one of the great film performances, for my money.  He brings a danger & passion to Ennis that feels worn, rough, and tender.  The way he handles that last scene of the movie, where all of the bitterness that he's shown turns into tenderness, knowing what he once had...it's gut-wrenching.  Brokeback would fall on its ass if the Ennis character didn't stick in your gut, but with Ledger, even 15 years later, his work still feels raw and challenging.

Ledger lost the Oscar to Philip Seymour Hoffman (three years later, Hoffman would lose the Oscar to Ledger, but we've already discussed that), and at the time this made total sense since Hoffman, while he'd never been nominated, felt like the sort of guy who'd been born to win an Oscar considering the plethora of high-prestige movies he'd been in to that point.  His Truman is a feat, though it's one I wasn't impressed by.  I don't love transformation performances (into famous people), unless they feel like authentic creations onscreen, and this always veers into mimicry for me.  Hoffman is a good actor (I've seen him give a great performance in The Master and a legendary one onstage in Death of a Salesman), but he falls into overacting so easily, especially early in his career, and this is a part rife with overacting.  Capote is cold & scant in its best moments, but it juxtaposes poorly against Hoffman's Capote, unfeeling & hammy in what he brings to the screen.

Joaquin Phoenix also has a bit of the mimicry going on in Walk the Line, but it doesn't feel at odds with his film.  For starters, Walk the Line isn't as stylistic as Capote, so there's less room to not match with the movie itself, and secondly, Phoenix brings a life to his Cash that never feels like it's simply an imitation.  Phoenix's performance occasionally goes so deep that you don't get the sense of enjoyment from the character that you do Witherspoon's June (Witherspoon seems more intent on giving a great show than imitating her famous counterpart, something that you can't claim for Phoenix), but after the histrionics of Gladiator, this was a nod to the peak duo of The Master/Her that was soon to come from this actor.

David Strathairn rounds out our trio of real-life figures, but while he has countless hours of television to study Edward R. Murrow from, he's the least known to modern audiences so while his vocal pacing is immaculate, it's also unnecessary.  Strathairn's got one of the more challenging roles-how do you create an arch for a man who is famous for sticking to his principles?  He does so with subtle movements, his slow indication that he won't stand injustice, and the ways in which he underlines the risks he's taking with the network by becoming more reserved as the film goes on; it's not the sort of performance you expect Oscar to love, but it's thrilling to see when he does.

The final nominee has had arguably the strangest post-Oscar career of these actors (if obviously not the most heartbreaking).  Howard went from superhero sidekick to getting out-shined in his broadcast TV show relatively quickly after this was released (and is also famous for bizarre offscreen behavior, though that's true of every one of these guys save for Strathairn), but in 2005 was the big new star of the year.  He likely won this nomination for both Crash and Hustle & Flow, but that's not how the OVP works (I only judge the nominated perf, not what else led to a nomination), and Howard is only okay in Hustle & Flow.  This is the least of the actual movies up in this category, so the arch isn't atypical (musician wanting to strike it big is not breaking ground), and while Howard is raw & felt, especially his scenes with his future Empire costar Taraji P. Henson, it feels routine against some of these turns.


Other Precursor Contenders: We start with the Globes, which distinguish between Drama and "Comedy/Musical," and as a result have ten men on our ballot.  For Drama we have Hoffman besting Russell Crowe (Cinderella Man), Howard, Ledger, and Strathairn, while in Musical/Comedy it's Phoenix on top over Jeff Daniels (The Squid and the Whale), Johnny Depp (Charlie and the Chocolate Factory), Nathan Lane (The Producers), and Cillian Murphy (Breakfast on Pluto).  SAG skipped Howard in favor of Crowe, but kept the rest of the Oscar lineup (including the winner), while Hoffman also won the BAFTA, this time over Strathairn, Ledger, Phoenix, and Ralph Fiennes (The Constant Gardener).  Weirdly considering my comment about some of these men's offscreen behavior, the only reason Howard was able to get in was because Crowe spent most of 2005 earning headlines for throwing a phone at a hotel clerk-he was surely in sixth place, and probably a close sixth.
Actors I Would Have Nominated: I'd get rid of three of these guys, but this isn't a bad lineup (2005 in general Oscar didn't get dealt a great hand by the film industry from what I'm finding, and thus made the most of a lousy deck).  That said, I'd keep Fiennes, who is awesome opposite Rachel Weisz's Oscar-winning turn in one of many great performances AMPAS has skipped since The English Patient.  I'd also keep Daniel Auteil's intricate work as a TV host in Cache, and in a little-remembered turn, Bill Murray as a man looking through the women of his past in Broken Flowers.
Oscar’s Choice: History might remember this as closer than it was at the time considering the longitude achieved by Brokeback Mountain, but this was Hoffman in a walk.
My Choice: Heath Ledger gives what might be the best performance of this century on film-it's just that good.  There's no way I wouldn't give him the trophy, or even say that he's close even if David Strathairn would've been a worthy winner in different circumstances.  Behind the two of them is Phoenix, Howard, and Hoffman.

Those are my thoughts-what are yours?  Are you with me over in Team Ennis, or does Capote still have its share of fans?  Do you think Terence Howard ever gets back in with an Oscar nomination or has that portion of his career ended?  And if Crowe doesn't pick up that telephone, would he have gotten his fourth nomination (a nod that I bet never materializes now that he's past his movie star years)?  Share your thoughts below in the comments!

Past Best Actor Contests: 200720082009201020112012201320142015, 2016

Monday, October 17, 2016

My Dozen Favorite Actors

Well I didn't quite get this out when I wanted to, but we're back with round two of my three-part look at my favorite actresses, actors, and directors.  For those unfamiliar with round one, click here, and for those that have been eagerly awaiting, let's take a look at my all-time favorite actors (listed alphabetically, as actually ranking them sounded too difficult-to-choose).

Honorable Mention: Like the actresses, there were countless names that showed up here for me.  We have a few actors who just barely missed the cut (Michael Caine, Al Pacino, Leonardo DiCaprio, and Dustin Hoffman all spring to mind, but their careers were too inconsistent for my tastes).  We have a few actors who don't work enough or don't quite have the body-of-work I was looking for, but the talent is very, very real (James Dean, Daniel Day-Lewis).  There's a few actors whom I've always thoroughly enjoyed, but for whatever reason I've still got too much missing in their filmographies to really make the jump here for them (Alec Guinness, William Powell, Robert Mitchum, and Fredric March all come to mind).  And finally, there's some younger actors I adore, but I'm not quite there yet to call them one of my twelve favorites, even though they're appointment viewing at this point for me (Jake Gyllenhaal, Michael Fassbender, Michael B. Jordan, Oscar Isaac, and Channing Tatum are all actors I give myself a pass to see in pretty much any film).  That being said, here's our Top 12.

Warren Beatty (1937-Present)

Oscar History: As an actor, which is the focus here (there are several men who moonlit as directors throughout their careers on the list, but you don't get extra credit for that in the countdown), Beatty is 0/4 in terms of Oscar.  However, he is also a 14-time nominee, getting cited for writing, producing, and directing in addition to his four Best Actor nods, and won Best Director for Reds and then the Thalberg in 1999.
First Impressions: Beatty, like several actors on this list, has never really made a kids movie.  My first interaction with Beatty was strangely at a young age, though, as my brother and I would regularly play with a Dick Tracy colorform toy at my grandmother's religiously, though our focus was less on Beatty's oversized image (it always bothered me that he wasn't proportional to all of the other Dick Tracy characters), but instead on Madonna and her glamorous silhouette, which as a young gay child was far more fascinating to me.
Why the Love: Beatty is rarely onscreen (in some ways he's similar to Day-Lewis up-top), but when he is, he's always the beautiful, driven dreamer.  He somehow combines the beauty of a young Mel Gibson with the actorly determination of Montgomery Clift, and he isn't shy about making his characters flawed, potentially even unlikable, and making you uncomfortable for wanting to still pursue them (think of Splendor in the Grass or Reds).  All-in-all, he's one of those screen presences that even when he's leering into bombast, he's insanely watchable.
My Favorite Performance: Surely this is Bonnie and Clyde.  Beatty has made a lot of movies that I enjoy, but he's never been sexier, more vulnerable, or stronger than as Clyde Barrow.
Missing Piece: I would have to say Bugsy as it's perhaps the last truly significant film of his career, and a film that many people expected to win the Academy Award for Best Picture when Silence of the Lambs pulled off the upset.

Marlon Brando (1924-2004)

Oscar History: 8 nominations/2 wins (On the Waterfront and The Godfather)
First Impressions: I want to say that my first impression of Brando was either seeing him, randomly, in kitsch wall art while shopping at our local K-Mart, or perhaps it was (in fact) the first movie I really remember catching him in, which was A Streetcar Named Desire, a movie that profoundly changed my life.
Why the Love: Where to begin?  Brando was a complicated genius, one who spent long periods of his career making, arguably, crap (name a decent Brando film from the 60's or 80's-I dare you), but when he was on there really is no one in the world of the movies that can compare.  Brando, at his best, could portray a sensitive vulnerability unmatched by other actors, a combination of raw, animal lust and a brooding desire (word choice intentional).
My Favorite Performance: Streetcar contains my two favorite onscreen performances, period, and I doubt that that ever changes.  It's weird when you have Terry Malloy, Don Corleone, and Paul from Last Tango in Paris on-deck to relegate them to lower tiers on the podium since they're all landmark pieces of acting, but there's just no topping Stanley Kowalski.
Missing Piece: Like a few actors on this list, I've actually seen most of Brando's major performances, as well as a few that he'd probably wish I'd forgotten.  I'm going to go with Viva Zapata, one of only two Oscar-nominated turns of his that I'm still missing (the other being A Dry White Season), as it clearly had some ardent fans.

Robert de Niro (1943-Present)

Oscar History: 7 nominations/2 wins (The Godfather, Part II and Raging Bull)
First Impressions: My first impression of Robert de Niro was actually a film that I didn't really like, but my parents did (which was rare when I was a kid) called Awakenings, a film that I truly should watch again as I have little memory of it other than I didn't care for the picture.
Why the Love: You'll notice that Dustin Hoffman and Al Pacino didn't make this list, but de Niro, the third leg in the "once brilliant, now largely coasting on our considerable movie memories" portion of their trio, does.  That's because de Niro is, when he's at his peak, the best of the three.  A marvelous actor, his streak in the 1970's and 80's is unmatched by most actors-it's hard to imagine a rawer bunlde of energy.  He's earned comparisons to Brando, but while Brando played off of his sexuality and fluidity, de Niro is nerves and live wires, electric in the way that he commands the screen at his peak.
My Favorite Performance: Taxi Driver.  I could easily say Godfather Part II and Raging Bull (you're going to have a hard-time convincing me he doesn't deserve three Oscars), but Taxi Driver is just an extraordinary piece of work, and quintessential de Niro.
Missing Piece: I have only missed one of de Niro's Oscar-nominated turns, so I will say Cape Fear, a film that I'm actually curious about as it was on the precipice of de Niro going into his "cash in on the legend" phase.

Michael Douglas (1944-Present)


Oscar History: 1 nomination/1 win (for acting, Douglas has only won for Wall Street, though as a producer he also won a second trophy for One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest)
First Impressions: This one is easy in terms of remembering because it was a quintessential part of my childhood.  So many of our relationships with movies are forged by our parents, and for me I saw Romancing the Stone and Jewel of the Nile countless times growing up because they were two of my mom's favorite movies.  Hence a very early appreciation of Michael Douglas.
Why the Love: Douglas is a great everyman, and may have been the most vibrant and relevant actor of the 1990's, despite his strange lack of an Oscar nomination during that period.  Like de Niro, he kind of phones it in lately but when he was on-top of himself, he was even better than his famed father: a movie star panache combined with a wonderful, actorly approach.  Douglas will always be one of those rare male actors I loved unabashedly, even when he felt down for the count.
My Favorite Performance: Surely The American President-his Andrew Shephard isn't Jed Bartlett (few creations are, and President Bartlett had multiple seasons to grow upon me), but is more appropriate for a film setting and manages to breed that rarest of cinematic products-an intelligent, competent romance between two equally-savvy human beings without resorting to motifs, but instead keeping them smart.  It's a triumph, and shows off Douglas' rather sharp comedic skills, which are often under-utilized.
Missing Piece: I want to say Basic Instinct-there's a few holes I have in Douglas filmography (Falling Down and The China Syndrome also feel like they're toward the top of this list), but Stone at her peak with Douglas at his seems like something I'd have trouble turning down-it's coming up in the Netflix queue.

Ralph Fiennes (1962-Present)

Oscar History: 2 nominations (sadly no wins, but Schindler's List and The English Patient both are strong crutches to lean upon)
First Impressions: I think it'd have to be The English Patient in terms of actual cinema-Fiennes didn't start doing fare for younger audiences until later in his career, at which point I was an adult proper and saw all of his films anyway.  I do distinctly remember his nomination in 1996 and getting into much ballyhooed conversations with people who didn't remotely care about such things over whether it was pronounced Rafe or Ralph.
Why the Love: Ralph Fiennes is the most electric actor currently working in the cinema this millennium, save for perhaps a Shawnee, Oklahoma native we'll get into in a minute.  Fiennes is always on-point and interesting, even when he's got a film that appears to require him to be just stately and British (Harry Potter, James Bond), and when he's doing his dramatics, he's dynamite.  Think of how M. Gustave, Amon Goeth, and the murderous, profane Harry are all played by the same man-he exhibits a range that rivals Streep in the 1980's.  That Oscar consistently has looked over such wonders is a bit of a stain on their reputation, but at least we have those movies to revisit until the end of time.
My Favorite Performance: Fiennes is one of those actors I love pretty much every time he leaves his trailer, so I feel a little cheap saying that forever and always Count Laszlo de Almasy will remain, eternally, at the top of my list of favorite performances from the Brit.  And yet, his maddening, marvelous look at love and the obsession of attaining it even despite the dangers that it proposes is something I cannot deny.
Missing Piece: I've actually seen most of Fiennes' work-he's one of those actors I've given a free pass to for over a decade and rarely miss anything that he puts out.  I'd probably go with something very early in his career then, like Wuthering Heights or Quiz Show, as ones that I'm missing but I've seen over 50% of his filmography, which is something that as a general rule is hard to achieve without trying.

Cary Grant (1904-1986)


Oscar History: 2 nominations (Grant never won a competitive Oscar, but he did pick up an Honorary one in 1969)
First Impressions: Weirdly my first interaction with Grant was with one of his last films, in Father Goose.  I was visiting my aunt with my family, and my mom/aunt both were wildly excited while flipping the channels when they saw the film was just starting on a cable channel.  I remember being underwhelmed, mostly because I was very young and didn't actually get what was going on onscreen.
Why the Love: Grant eventually became a taste I couldn't get enough of, though, after that initial screening.  He may not have been a great actor in the sense of Brando or de Niro, constantly transforming himself onscreen but he was a man who knew exactly how to pick elegant and charming scripts over-and-over again, giving us decades of marvelously charming roles.  It's hard to deny that Grant, whenever he's onscreen, was a bubbly delight to view, and he seemingly did the impossible, finding ways to have chemistry with performers as diverse as Mae West, Kate Hepburn, Grace Kelly, and Sophia Loren.
My Favorite Performance: Like I said, Grant's best performance seemed to be playing the same role over-and-over again, the public's persona of himself.  However, if I had to nail down one specific role it'd be The Philadelphia Story, which is my favorite of his movies and where he even outdoes eventual Oscar winner Jimmy Stewart, the rare time where the Best Actor winner wasn't better than one of his male coleads in the same picture (perhaps the only time?  Share another if you can think of it in the comments)
Missing Piece: I've seen almost every Cary Grant film of note, quite frankly, save one-somehow, in all of my years of watching movies, I've never watched His Girl Friday despite every intention of doing so.  I feel guiltier about this one than any other missing piece on this list-perhaps I'll make a point of it this week?

Heath Ledger (1979-2008)


Oscar History: 2 nominations/1 win (The Dark Knight)
First Impressions: My first impression of Heath Ledger was that he was the most beautiful man I'd ever laid eyes upon in The Patriot.  He was gloriously handsome in the film, making it one of the first times where I actually noticed someone who wasn't the star of a picture and pinpointed him to be a major player-I was right, though considering 10 Things I Hate About You had come out the year before I was beaten by a number of other people in this regard.
Why the Love: Ledger is the person on this list with the scantest filmography, but honestly-he was fast-emerging prior to his death as the quintessential actor of his generation, in my opinion, and even the body-of-work that he left behind was challenging and fascinating.  He was one of the first actors that I became obsessed with while they were working-I would go to whatever film that he made, even as young as a teenager, just because it featured Ledger.  To this day, he is one of only two cinematic images that adorn the walls of my apartment (the plane sequence in Casablanca being the other), showing how much he still means to me, nearly ten years after his death.
My Favorite Performance: Ennis is too good to ignore, a challenging look at the ways that our lusts and our loves haunt us, even as we grow old or must deny that they happened just to move on with our lives.  I still can't believe that a movie so exquisite exists
Missing Piece: Like Fiennes, I've seen well over 50% of Ledger's filmography and most of the biggest hits.  I suspect, though, because I have such a continuing fascination with him that I'll eventually see them all.  The one I'm looking most forward to is Casanova, as it was always fun to see Ledger let out his playful side.

Paul Newman (1928-2008)


Oscar History: 10 nominations/1 win (for The Color of Money, though it's worth noting that Newman is that extremely rare actor who has not one but two Honorary statues, for lifetime achievement in 1985 and the Hersholt in 1993).
First Impressions: It was The Sting, a film that I have actually not seen since I first saw it some twenty years ago (I'll surely have to revisit it for the OVP).  I remember loving it, particularly the ending, but considering my taste in films as I've gotten older I'm not confident that that would hold.
Why the Love: Paul Newman is perhaps what Heath Ledger could have aspired to become-a proper thespian in the body of a matinee idol, Newman is the quintessential guy who could act, but you couldn't get past that mug of his.  That's a shame if you think of him as just a pretty face, because Newman consistently stole most of his films, almost all of which he played the lead, and frequently brought a movie star's panache along with some genuine depth-of-character.  He's intensely watchable, outside and in.
My Favorite Performance: This is actually tricky for me, because while I love most of his work, I've never seen the performance that stands out as "this is my Paul Newman" in the way that Brando or Fiennes has for me.  I think I'm going to go with Hud, if only because that's a wonderful movie, one that combines his flare for danger with his intense sexuality, and he has a marvelous screen partner in Patricia Neal to accentuate what he's doing in the film.  I could be convinced it should be others though.
Missing Piece: I have never seen The Hustler.  I'm aware of the shame this brings to my name.

Jack Nicholson (1937-Present)

Oscar History: 12 nominations/3 wins (One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, Terms of Endearment, As Good As It Gets)
First Impressions: "Have you ever danced with the devil in the pale moonlight?"  For those who get that reference, you'll know why Jack Nicholson is a lifelong affair, something challenging that also is constantly electric, a headliner with the razor-sharp focus of a persistent player on the boards.  For those that don't know the reference, they started making superhero movies before 2005-please investigate.
Why the Love: Who doesn't love Jack?  Honestly-the man is one of the most consistently watchable presences in the history of cinema, and unlike de Niro/Pacino, he actually kept challenging himself for most of the latter half of his career, scoring that third Oscar that alluded Bob (and severely alluded Al).  Nicholson may occasionally over-indulge in his reputation as a batshit crazy screen presence, but he had the bonafides from early in his career (that he occasionally brought out just to prove he still had it in places like About Schmidt) to be both a caricature and a great actor.  Also, he usually made really good movies-taste in scripts should not be discounted here.
My Favorite Performance: It feels weird not to go with something like The Shining or Cuckoo's Nest, since those are the roles that are kind of hallmarks of Nicholson's career, but I can't pick anything other than Jake Gittes in Chinatown.  This is Jack when he's still proving himself as one of the great screen presences, so he holds back in moments he later would have partook in some scenery, and that restraint adds to the menace of one of the truly perfect films.
Missing Piece: I've seen most of Nicholson's most important roles, but I am missing Five Easy Pieces, which I'm actually confident is toward the top of my Netflix queue so that's coming up pretty quickly.  After that, maybe Prizzi's Honor?

Brad Pitt (1963-Present)


Oscar History: 3 nominations (As an actor, though Pitt is 3/1 with producing, as he won for 12 Years a Slave, and had the Academy not changed the rules he should have been included as a nominee for producing The Tree of Life as well)
First Impressions: Joe.  I always pronounce that name the way that Anthony Hopkins did in Meet Joe Black. I remember being struck while watching it that Pitt was both one of the most beautiful men I'd ever seen and how much more I was enjoying this film than all of my classmates, who found it dull and listless while I found it terribly romantic and moving.  I haven't revisited it in many years, but I do believe it was one of the first times I realized it was okay to have an opinion different than the popular one, a critical moment in an appreciation for the movies.
Why the Love: Pitt, more than any other actor, gets the free pass when it comes to me seeing his movies-with two exceptions (at least one of which is on my Netflix queue), I've seen every film he's done for over fifteen years, and have just been in awe of his Adonis-like determination.  Pitt is, like Newman, an actor that perhaps is too beautiful for him to initially be taken seriously but he is also a consummate performer, finding challenging, subdued ways into all of his characters-he's the rare guy that can headline an action film and add an actor's sensibilities to the role, giving us more for our ticket price.  I'm forever in love with him.
My Favorite Performance: A few actors on this list I hadn't actually thought before about what my "favorite" performance is of theirs, and Pitt is one of them.  Argh-it's such a tossup between Assassination of Jesse James and The Tree of Life (both his peak for different reasons) that I'm not going to choose-if you force me to in the comments, I might relent in hopes of getting more interaction on the blog.
Missing Piece: I've seen, as I mentioned, almost every film of Pitt's for the past fifteen years.  However, a bit of his earlier work still alludes me (though even there it's not much), and one of those that I'm thrilled to eventually get to see is 12 Monkeys, his first Oscar-nominated turn.

James Stewart (1908-1997)


Oscar History: 5 nominations/1 win (The Philadelphia Story, though he also won an Honorary Oscar in 1984 for his general contributions to the movies)
First Impressions: Like so many of us, my initial introduction to Jimmy Stewart was as George Bailey, a worthy first chapter for pretty much anyone as Stewart was an actor I instantly fell in love with, the way he distinctly pronounced every sentence (I've said "Mary, Mary" like him for so many years that I can't even remember when it started) and found his heart at the end of the picture.  How could you not fall in love?
Why the Love: Stewart long has received comparisons to another actor that I fell in love with in my youth, though he was current at the time, Tom Hanks, but let's face facts here (with all due respect to Tom): Stewart is a more interesting performer and better actor.  While Hanks frequently traded on his nice-guy persona, Stewart found a balance between maintaining it and occasionally making us uncomfortable in it.  Look at, say, the way that he abandons all hope in It's a Wonderful Life despite him being a genuinely good guy or how he looks back with anguish on his failures in Liberty Valance.  He found a way to challenge the audience while still remaining Jimmy Stewart.
My Favorite Performance: Like Nicholson, it feels somewhat like cheating to go with Stewart's most atypical classic role, but how can you turn down Scottie in Vertigo, the film where Stewart completely abandons his nice guy image (something he likely could only do once quite effectively), but does so in such a way as to make a cinematic masterpiece.
Missing Piece: Anatomy of a Murder is the final major film of Stewart's filmography I've never seen, and was his final Best Actor nomination so the OVP will eventually steer me there.

Orson Welles (1915-1985)

Oscar History: 1 nomination (Citizen Kane, though he was also nominated for writing and directing the movie, and would win an Honorary Oscar in 1970)
First Impressions: It would be Rosebud herself as my first impression of Welles, an actor who loomed very large early on for me, but also quite small, in the same way as Vivien Leigh since his most famous role so overshadowed everything else in his filmography.
Why the Love: Welles is a champion of the screen, a truly great thespian who occasionally indulged his reputation more than he should have (remember those wine commercials, not to mention Transformers?), but when he was on (which was most of the time), he was stupendous, a consummate actor whether or not he was behind the screen directing himself.  To limit yourself to Charlie Kane might be understandable, but would deprive you of one of the great screen icons.
My Favorite Performance: I mean, it's the greatest film of all-time for a reason, so I think I have to put Citizen Kane, but it's worth noting that Oscar could have had a Swanson/Davis style match of acting master classes in 1958 had they simply nominated Stewart for Vertigo and Orson Welles for his "wilderness period" opus Touch of Evil.  Throw in Harry Lime in The Third Man, and Welles arguably should have had three acting Oscars, even though he never got one.
Missing Piece: Perhaps Chimes at Midnight, which actually just came out on Netflix disc and so this might actually happen after years of trying to track it down.

There you have it-my dozen favorite actors.  There's a lot to go over here, so head to the comments and let me know what you think-did I make the right calls in performances, missing pieces, and especially in the twelve men I listed?  Who would you have found room for?  Share below!

Wednesday, August 05, 2015

OVP: Supporting Actor (2008)

OVP: Best Supporting Actor (2008)

The Nominees Were...


Josh Brolin, Milk
Robert Downey, Jr., Tropic Thunder
Philip Seymour Hoffman, Doubt
Heath Ledger, The Dark Knight
Michael Shannon, Revolutionary Road

My Thoughts: We have finally arrived-the Big 6.  The categories where even if you haven't seen the films, it's more-than-likely that you'll have an opinion on the actors that are nominated.  And why shouldn't you?  In many ways this category represents best the five men you were most likely to have seen on big screens in the past decade or so.  There's the highest-paid actor in Hollywood (at least it feels like it), there's an omnipresent character actor, another omnipresent character actor, and then two actors who were considered amongst the best of their generation until they tragically died.  Yes, this is one of two times that Philip Seymour Hoffman and Heath Ledger strangely competed against each other for an Oscar (they emerged 1-1 from the battles), and yet both died tragically from drug use before they could break the tie.  Since they're clearly the focus as we start discussing, let's start with them.

Hoffman's Father Flynn is, let's be honest here, a leading character in Doubt.  In the same way that Ledger's Joker is questionably in this category, Hoffman probably has a bit too much screen-time to qualify as a "supporting actor" (you might remember that that didn't stop me from giving him the OVP in 2012, though).  I also have to admit that in general I wasn't wild about Hoffman in this role.  PSH is a great stage actor (I had the incredible honor of seeing him in Death of a Salesman, which I found spellbinding), but that rarely translates well onscreen which is why I've only once been a huge fan of him in a movie role (again, click that link).  There's too much over-the-top with Father Flynn when I feel like he could have been quieter and taken better, more cautious choices.  This is my opinion in general with Doubt, which doesn't really know that it's stopped being a play and gain from a little subtlety, but it's Hoffman's work as Father Flynn that takes the biggest heat-his yelling over Streep makes both of them a little careless with their impressive acting instruments, and the film suffers as a result.

Ledger, on the other hand, finds a way to bring an oversized character to life in The Dark Knight.  So much has been written about this role, both how it became larger when Ledger died prior to the film's release, as well as how fanboys flocked to its instant iconography, but who can blame them?  There's really no false notes here-Ledger creates a ruthless, menacing villain who steals the film from out from under the rest of the cast, but yet doesn't seem to be committing highway robbery with the film.  The movie simmers with electricity both when he's onstage, constantly creating a character that is unknowable yet instantly feared, and when he's offstage you are always waiting for if the Joker might arrive and create a moment of tragedy.  All-in-all, it's the sort of performance that cannot be denied the title of great, and one that weirdly lives up to the almost insurmountable hype.

Robert Downey, Jr. completes this trio of over-the-top performances, and I have to say that I love Tropic Thunder more every time that I see it, particularly due to Downey's work.  The film borders frequently on the distasteful, but Downey knows how to milk the comedy out of every single line, and I adore the way that he consistently finds ways to mock both the character that he's playing as a real-person and the character he's playing as the fake actor onscreen.  There's so many wonderful layers of comedy here you might expect you're in a Mel Brooks film.  In the years since I've felt like Downey was slouching, and some might say this nomination was in part due to Iron Man, but that doesn't mean it wasn't wholly worthy of a citation, and I like that this strange little comedy (starring Ben Stiller and Jack Black of all people) managed such an unusual Oscar nomination for acting.

Josh Brolin by this point in 2008 was bound to be getting an Oscar nomination (he had been in SO many Oscar-nominated films in the three years prior), and thankfully it was for arguably his best work, bringing Dan White to the screen.  I think the best part about what Brolin does here is not just that he creates yet another villain for this category, but that he makes Dan White confused as to why he is the villain.  You see that in the looks on his face and his reactions to Harvey-he's the one who the institution should favor-the straight, white man with the family, and yet it's the gay man from the Castro who is getting all of the glory.  I like that Brolin comes at the prejudice from a point of privilege and confusion rather than just hate as it makes Dan White a far more interesting and complicated foil.

I distinctly remember the shock on everyone's (figurative) face that Michael Shannon scored an Oscar nomination for Revolutionary Road when Kate Winslet and Sam Mendes both were skipped over; James Franco or Dev Patel had seemed more likely scenarios for the fifth slot.  I particularly remember being floored as I wasn't particularly taken with Shannon in this role.  The entire concept of his John in the film seems wholly unnecessary-the story is Frank and April's, and his angry "crazy" man next door isn't really conducive to the plot and feels added-on and occasionally distracting.  It doesn't help, though, that Shannon is frequently milking the scenes and chewing on them-the performance is over-the-top.  I like what it did for Shannon's career (he would go on to much better work, like Boardwalk Empire), and I'm always rooting for a shock nomination, but this wasn't really a worthy one.

Other Precursor Contenders: The Globes couldn't help but do a little bit of movie star plucking, skipping character actors Josh Brolin and Michael Shannon and instead going with Ralph Fiennes in The Duchess and Tom Cruise in Tropic Thunder (another performance under a whole lot of makeup-remember when Les Grossman was a thing?).  The SAG Awards ,which don't have a choice over which category you submit yourself for, picked the clearly lead Dev Patel (Slumdog Millionaire) in place of Michael Shannon, while the BAFTA Awards skipped both Brolin and Shannon to go with Brendan Gleeson in In Bruges and Brad Pitt in Burn After Reading.  While Heath Ledger won all three trophies, I'm curious over who was in sixth-for years now I've thought Dev Patel, but considering Shannon probably got in with minimal support, there's a chance that one of the Best Picture contenders (Michael Sheen, Ralph Fiennes, James Franco) may have also been able to slide in for a nomination.  Fiennes, in particular seems likely, but for which of his three film contenders?
Performances I Would Have Nominated: This was a solid year for this category, which makes me a little bummed at some of the category fraud and that Michael Shannon managed the surprise.  Ralph Fiennes was doing brilliantly funny work in In Bruges, James Franco was wonderfully sexual in Milk, and Brad Pitt was comically inept and over-the-top in the underseen Burn After Reading.  I would have preferred any of these contenders (all of whom were at least in the conversation) over Hoffman or Shannon.
Oscar’s Choice: Heath Ledger became only the second actor to win an Oscar posthumously, likely taking out Hoffman and Brolin, in that order.
My Choice: There's just no denying Ledger.  For second place, I'm going to go with Brolin in a slight nod over Downey (they're close, though), as I think Dan White is a harder stand-out.  Hoffman and Shannon finish out the five.

Those are my thoughts-what are yours?  Does anyone out there want to make a case for Heath Ledger to lose?  Are you with me that Michael Shannon's nomination seems strange not just for the surprise but also because the performance just isn't that good?  And who do you have in second place here?  Share in the comments!


Past Best Supporting Actor Contests: 2009, 201020112012, 2013

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

Monday, December 19, 2005

Capote, The Family Stone, Syriana, and that Brokeback Mountain

All right, I'm giving this another shot (if only because I'm waiting for South Park, the newest thing that I can self-loathe myself for adoring, isn't on for another half an hour). In the midst of Finals Week (what a torturous device that is), I managed to catch the following films: here's a take on them.

Capote-Philip Seymour Hoffman, I'm fairly certain, lives only to irk me. His fimography would be impressive (Cold Mountain, Boogie Nights, and Magnolia would be a grand resume for most), if it weren't for the fact that he mucks up anything he enters. Those scenes in Cold Mountain may have been the worst distraction in a movie I may have otherwise liked since Mickey Rooney wandered onto the Breakfast at Tiffany's set (not that I'm comparing the fine but long Cold Mountain to the sparkling and polished Tiffany's, but you see my point). He continues on with his quest in Capote, a film that disects an interesting man into a heap of ticks and mannerisms. Sure, Hoffman manages to mimic Capote's lilt and walk, but he never allows the viewers inside of this complex individual. When the doors are shut, Hoffman is still performing, not letting Capote's guard down. As a result, the emotional tugs at the end aren't pulling hard enough. Catherine Keener and Clifton Collins wish to step and give it their all, but with Hoffman keeping everyone at a distance, it is impossible to connect to anyone. The feeling is indeed cold at the end, but it is not over Perry Smith's blood-it is simply from never being allowed into the movie. (C)

The Family Stone-From cold to warm: chestnuts-roasting-on-the-fire while I try on the latest sweater from Eddie Bauer warm. The Family Stone is too cute for its own good, and never really puts itself together, but the pieces it tries to assemble are worth investigating, at least for a while. Diane Keaton, in her matronly best, treads through the familiar territory of a matriarch; Craig T. Nelson, absent from his blase Coach, is all heart and home as the too-good-to-be-true father; and of course, Rachel McAdams, devilish and witty as the wicked sister. The only major character who doesn't work is Sarah Jessica Parker (yes, Carrie Bradshaw can fail at something other than not choosing Aidan)-she's a bitch without much of a reason to react the way she does. In the end, I found myself hoping that they'd throw her out on her coutured derriere and leave me to my hopelessly hip Stone Family. (B-)

Syriana-Traffic, so fresh and exciting in 2000, left an imprint that many other issue films would do well to look into: it's a multi-charactered story that manages to pull together a plot, as well as instill the urgency of its political hot potato. Syriana, while not quite the smooth sailor that Traffic is (Syriana gets a little too bogged down in the politics of its presentation, and doesn't allow for as full of character arcs), still manages to capture the basics of a good flick. The standouts include Damon's desert breakdown, Clooney's cool-under-pressure agent, and the omnipresent essence of Chris Cooper (seriously, are he and William Hurt going to be in EVERY movie I see this year?) Syriana's ending may be a little bit long, but the rest snaps. (B+)

Brokeback Mountain-As always, I saved the best for last, and I just don't mean in this column. Brokeback Mountain may be the best movie of the decade that Peter Jackson didn't have a hand in. It's timeless love story between Jake and Heath is complex and starts plainly enough-Lee spends the first twenty minutes of the movie carving out his own little world, and then gives the audience the love that they will be recalling for the remainder of the film. The movie itself reads as if it's sixty years old and made yesterday all at once, mastering scene after classic scene as if it's appealing to both today's and tomorrow's audiences: Heath's breakdown after their first goodybe, the passionate reunion, Alma's (Michelle Williams) "you don't go up there to fish" speech. By the time the movie has begun to reach its climax, it has crescendoed to such extraordinary lengths, it just washes over the audience. The ending proves that movies can become better with every passing frame, but its the entire work that proves that movies, well, they just can't get any better. (A+)