Kate Winslet in Labor Day |
If you haven’t been able to tell through these posts (and I’m aware
that I talk about it literally every chance I can get), I used to live in New
York City. It is my favorite place
on earth-I love everything about it, from the theater to the food to the
people. Even the things I hate
about it (like how the Bronx smells like garbage after a warm rain) I secretly
love. If heaven exists, I desperately
want mine to look like New York.
However, not all of us have the great fortune of living in New York,
and when it comes to the Oscars and awards seasons, this matters in regard to what films are available to see. While
I don’t live in New York, Minneapolis/St. Paul is still a very large media and
cultural market. It is the
fifteenth largest metropolitan area in the country, and has a plethora of art
house and mainstream cinemas. And
yet, every year, because of the release schedules of studios and distributors,
I am left a bit forlorn come Oscar season.
Looking at Thursday's Golden Globe nominations, I was struck by two
films that showed up on the list: The
Wind Rises and Labor Day. Both films scored important award nominations for the calendar year of 2013 (Best Foreign Film for the former and Best Actress in a Drama for the latter), and yet these films won’t be seen
during the calendar year for the vast majority of the United States (I also
feel the great pain of people around the world with these releases, but that's a plight for a different post). Labor Day is scheduled for an art house
release on January 31st and The
Wind Rises will be released to the rest of the country on February 21st. This, obviously, is ridiculous. By these dates we will not only have
seen whether Kate Winslet and Hayao Miyazaki emerge victorious from the Beverly
Hilton, but we’ll also know if they were able to translate their nominations to
success at the Oscars.
Put plainly, it is unfair to your average moviegoer, and quite frankly,
terrible business, to release these movies after their moments in the sun. Labor
Day, for example, likely won’t do any better this awards season than Winslet’s
Globe nomination, so it is idiotic that they don’t have the film ready in
theaters to capitalize on her success.
It’s not like this is a tiny film-it’s from an Oscar-nominated director
who has had major box office success in the past and stars an Oscar-winning
actress (who happened to star in the second most successful film of all-time)
and an Oscar-nominated actor who has also shown continued box office
success. Jason Reitman, Kate
Winslet, and Josh Brolin are all three selling points to a movie, and most if
not all art houses across the country would find room for them. The same holds true for the
critically-beloved Hayao Miyazaki, whose fans are ardent and numerous, and
would come out to see his film even in the heat of the Oscar season.
One could make the argument that the studios want to bet on their top
contenders during this crucial release time (everyone goes to the movies during
the Christmas season), and that’s why you’re seeing American Hustle, 12 Years a Slave, and Saving Mr. Banks in every theater across the country but not these
two films. However, there’s
something inherently wrong about not having films that are competing for a 2013
trophy available to the vast majority of the country in 2013. I’m not saying that you have to release
your films in every market in the country (if that were true, we’d have a Best
Picture race that excluded Nebraska and
Philomena in favor of Bad Grandpa), but the Twin Cities,
Chicago, Boston, Seattle, San Francisco, Dallas-you should at least be available
here, not just in LA and NYC.
On a personal level, this also bugs the crap out of me because I
cannot, as a blogger and an awards fanatic, complete my year-end lists at the
same time as the rest of you.
While I will probably still release my personal awards (have been making
them since I was eleven, and yes I am a nerd) on Oscar nomination eve like
usual, I will be bummed that Labor Day and
The Wind Rises won’t be amongst those
that I consider, and because I’m a true nerd, I won’t amend them later if I’m
wowed by Kate Winslet or Miyazaki’s swan song.
Every year this happens though: Coriolanus,
We Need to Talk About Kevin, On the Road-these are all films that competed
and got some precursor love but couldn’t be seen by the general public. It’s worth noting that despite positive
reviews for members of their casts, none of these films actually translated to
Oscar, and I am going to state flatly that I think their fractured release
schedule hurt them in this regard.
If people across the country were talking about how terrific Vanessa
Redgrave or Tilda Swinton or Garrett Hedlund were, they might have snuck in
when Oscar started his countdown (and no one better blame the Academy for not
getting through a screener here when no one else in the country is talking
about a film-it’s not the Oscars fault if you have major, bankable stars and
you cannot get any heat because for some reason you aren’t going wide).
Halle Berry in Frankie and Alice |
My favorite example of this phenomenon is Frankie and Alice from a few years back. The film starred Oscar-winner Halle Berry (a solid box
office draw for the past fifteen years or so) and scored a surprise Golden
Globe nomination. While an Oscar
nomination for Berry seemed an uphill climb (it was a very strong lineup), the
Golden Globe nomination certainly spurred some interest and she’s an important
enough actress that art houses likely would have taken the film in most major
markets. However, the film has
never been properly released.
According to imdb, it ran in two film festivals and a one-week qualifier
in Los Angeles, but exists now in only bootlegged screeners on the
internet. It never made it to even
New York, and has never been released on DVD despite the Globe nod and Berry’s
stature. It has FINALLY found a distributor and will go
to theaters this April, three years after Berry competed for Best Actress. This is darn-near unprecedented in
terms of awards shows, but it illustrates my point-Berry has no business being
nominated for Best Actress in 2010 for a film that 99% of America only had access
to for the first time in 2014.
Even if she’s giving a career best performance (and how would we know,
since none of us got to see it), she should be competing as Best Actress in 2014, not 2010.
The real sad thing about Labor
Day and The Wind Rises being such
humbugs is that this has been a notably good year for studios not trying these
shenanigans, and the best way to prove that is the strong push to get foreign
language film contenders in theaters across the country prior to the Oscar
nominations. The Great Beauty, The Broken Circle Breakdown, The Past, and Wadjda have all been in the Twin Cities
market in recent weeks or will be before the Oscar nominations are announced, and though I didn’t catch them all, I’m secretly hoping
that they all get nominated or shortlisted for Oscar, because I want to reward
their concerted effort to be seen and heard, rather than just hang on a shelf
until they maybe get an Oscar
nomination.
I’m reluctant to issue an ultimatum about films having to be in
multiple markets to be eligible for Oscar, though, because of the potential
implications if a very small film couldn’t land in a major market. A film like Upstream Color, for example, has picked up some nominations at the
Gotham and Spirit Awards, but probably didn’t play in a large number of markets
due to subject matter and its lack of major stars. I don’t want to close the Oscars off to small cinema such as
this, particularly if it’s worthy (thankfully this is out on DVD and I’ll see
it before I finalize my lists).
However, the other films I’ve highlighted have major stars: Kate
Winslet, Kristen Stewart, Tilda Swinton, Ralph Fiennes, and Halle Berry can all
open a movie just fine, and deserve no sort of sympathy. If offered, Landmark theaters would
line up at the opportunity to exhibit their films, and they did/will, but all after their awards heat had flourished.
No comments:
Post a Comment