Tuesday, October 07, 2014

OVP: Supporting Actor (2013)

OVP: Best Supporting Actor (2013)

The Nominees Were...


Barkhad Abdi, Captain Phillips
Bradley Cooper, American Hustle
Michael Fassbender, 12 Years a Slave
Jared Leto, Dallas Buyers Club

My Thoughts: And finally, we move into the actors of the 2013 Oscars, the twenty men and women who actually get face-time during the ceremony and the audience pays attention to their speeches rather than taking it as a moment to play Candy Crush.  As a result, I hope you have some opinions that you share in the comments.  Either way, though, it’s time to start perusing the stars.

I’m going to start out with the man who actually won the trophy, Jared Leto.  Leto is one of those actors who sort of felt like he’s underperformed in his career.  His weird obsession with both his second career as a musician and his bizarre issues with losing and gaining weight for every role he does (seriously-can’t we just hand that back to the makeup department?!?) has made us sort of forget that he was once a very promising actor, and this year was sort of a way to give an honor to what could have been a much stronger career (think of what would happen if Edward Norton made good once again…oh wait, that’s likely happening this year with Birdman).

Leto’s performance, though, left me completely cold.  I think that more than any of the four winning performances this one felt the most over-praised.  I think there was an admiration for the weight loss and his willingness to step into a character so unlike him, but Rayon is not a particularly compelling character.  The entire performance felt two-dimensional: we see him strut around and inject himself with drugs that are going to kill him, but we get little indication of what sort of person he used to be.  We have to fill-in-the-blanks, which is fine for a normal movie (you can’t rely on every supporting part to have a back story), but when you’re handing out an Oscar for it, there shouldn’t be room for errors.  Even the big reveal scene, where he dresses like a man and is clearly deeply uncomfortable doesn’t resonate because instead of using the scene to learn a bit more about Rayon, it’s just a giant middle finger to his father-nothing more than audience-pandering, rather than character-building.  This felt cheap, and this performance felt gimmicky, and I wasn’t into it at all.

I felt the same way about Barkhad Abdi in Captain Phillips.  This is a performance that gets more points from people, in my opinion, because of the story behind the actor than the actual work.  We see that it’s his film debut, that he was a cab driver in the Twin Cities, and then he made it all the way to the Oscars.  Every year there’s someone who manages to sell this plot to the media, and it’s a pretty exciting one (who wouldn’t want to think that a year from now you too could be at the Oscars?!?).  And yet, I just wasn’t feeling this performance at all-you could see too much of the “acting,” the quick switches in his emotions.  It doesn’t help that he’s competing against Tom Hanks, who hasn’t been this rich onscreen in years and is giving us deep, harsh, and complex emotions to observe in the film’s second act, but in comparison Abdi is just serviceable, and his character’s weirdly alternating motives took me out of his part entirely.

Michael Fassbender was the other actor who had a shot at “the win” (though really, Leto had that thing locked up the moment he took the stage at the Globes), and here is a man who genuinely understood his violent and evil character.  You see in Master Epps a bizarre mix of emotions, always bubbling to the surface.  He’s driven by hatred and lust, frequently dismissing anyone else but himself as a human being, as he has been given little by the outside world in terms of stature, so he must rely on his cruelty to Patsey and Solomon (and to some extent, his wife) to assert his dominance.  Fassbender gets the showiest role of the three (actually, scratch that-Leto does), but he also finds shades in his character, making him just human enough to be frightening (you can tell that he cannot explain his fascination and desire for Patsey, and this lack of knowledge consumes his rage toward her), but still never relenting in the horror that he brings to everyone onscreen.  It’s a brilliant piece of acting from perhaps the finest actor of his generation, and it’s about time that Oscar took notice.

Coming in after these three are two actors that I never would have pegged as future Oscar nominees, much less two-time Oscar nominees: Bradley Cooper and Jonah Hill.  Both men have had the good sense to balance their continued franchises and fame with smaller parts in prestigious films.  It helps that there’s clearly a desire by both men to be taken seriously as actors.  This helps since both are more than willing to take supporting parts in films, even though they are at the stature where they could demand to always be in the lead.  Of the two, Cooper is probably slightly better.  I loved the direction that he took his idiotic Richie, never letting up on the big fish in the little pond act.  It’s still Bradley Cooper, and so you find (like the scene with him in the bathroom of the nightclub) that there’s a desire there that you would want to succumb to, but Cooper is smart enough to balance his good looks (not dampening them through heavy makeup) with making his character abrasive, so it’s still believable that Amy Adams will eventually betray him.  I loved the way that he also changes his personality when he thinks he can impress or be in charge-that’s devotion to the bit, and yet another sign that Cooper is one to watch in the years to come.

While I was pretty much onboard with Bradley Cooper’s first Oscar nomination, I was less enthralled with Hill’s work in Moneyball, which I thought was pretty much a “ooh, he’s a big star going dramatic!” citation, rather than a nomination that was merited.  That being said, this is considerably better, as Hill proves once and for all that he has chops.  I love the way that his character in some ways mirrors Fassy’s Master Epps-they’re both men that are pretty rotten to the core, and not someone to emulate at all, but they both have shades of humanity.  With Hill, he needs to establish that his character isn’t just a vapid, soulless corporate lackey, which he does not through kindness, but instead through fear and trust in the only person he sees as more than a vessel to corrupt.  This isn’t a particularly easy part to play without totally blowing into a lack of realism, and Hill manages to play that well through most of the movie.

Other Precursor Contenders: The Globes were largely similar to the Oscars, snubbing Hill for Daniel Bruhl in Rush (clearly the sixth place), and also starting the gravy train for Jared Leto to pick up every award under the sun.  The SAG Awards also honored Leto, but made room for Bruhl and James Gandolfini in Enough Said by skipping Hill and Cooper.  Finally, the BAFTA Awards kind of went their own way with the year, bizarrely missing Leto and Hill (Abdi ended up winning), with Matt Damon in Behind the Candelabra and once again Bruhl scoring nominations.  All-in-all, I kind of get why Bruhl was snubbed (the smaller film, not pushing as hard for it as Hill), but this is one of those extremely rare circumstances where you score every precursor and still cannot make the cut (I’ve never seen Rush-should I?)
Performances I Would Have Nominated: I get why certain performances didn’t get cited (I’m looking at you John Gallagher, Jr.), but seriously-what was the Academy’s problem with the supporting men of Saving Mr. Banks?  Best Actress seemed like a category where there were six contenders and you just had to cut one, but Tom Hanks is an Academy favorite, playing a recognizable real-life person, and is terrific in it-where’s the citation for that?  Ditto Colin Farrell, who continues to get better and better, playing a man who is watching his daughter’s opinion of him crumbling amidst his alcohol and decay.  These are great pieces of acting, and both should have been cited.  The fact that neither did is, well, criminal.
Oscar’s Choice: They cannot avoid a gimmick or a co-lead, and Jared Leto had both, so he takes the trophy.
My Choice: Definitely Fassbender-he’s kind of in a class by himself here.  Cooper, Hill, Leto, and finally Abdi follow behind.

Those are my thoughts-what are yours?  Do you agree with the Academy in celebrating Leto’s finally delivering on his promise, or are you more in the Fassy camp with me?  Who gets to a third nod first-Cooper or Hill?  What does Barkhad Abdi’s career hold in store?  And who was the best supporting actor on 2013?  Share in the comments!


Past Best Supporting Actor Contests: 2009, 201020112012

No comments: