Leader Pelosi with Democratic Congresswomen |
After we discussed the seats that the Democrats needed to hold, as well as the seats most likely to turn their way (due to the President’s performance
in the district), we’ll now dive into the races that will make-or-break a
majority.
As I’ve mentioned before, this is a best case scenario for the
Democrats-even in the most optimistic of scenarios, the seats we’ve already
discussed would be a +7 seat gain for the Democrats, in a House where they need
at least seventeen seats to get to the finale. So, here are the ways they could pick up the remaining
seats.
Strong Recruitment in Marginal
Districts: We’ve already talked about how the difference between CA-21 and
CO-6, both seats that are relatively similar in their partisan makeup, is that
the Democrats have an excellent recruit in Colorado and no one in
California. You can’t win if you
don’t run, and so getting these candidates is key.
Iraq War Veteran Kevin Strouse |
Some of the best candidates the Democrats have recruited in marginal
district for 2014 include Dominic Recchia, a New York City Councilman who is
running against Michael Grimm in NY-11 or Iraq War veteran Kevin Strouse in
PA-8 (the low amount of Democratic congressmen in Pennsylvania is stunning
considering the Democrats stronghold there statewide).
There are also a few other states that have questionably good
candidates-we’re still waiting to see on whether, say, State Rep. Mike
Obermueller can better put MN-2 (which is a seat that went for the President
last cycle) in play than he did last cycle (when he was outspent 3-1), or if Naval
Officer Suzanne Patrick can outplay Rep. Scott Rigell in the increasingly
liberal VA-2. Attorney Michael
Wager in Ohio’s 14th district will be running against an incumbent
who skirted through on a technicality in 2014, which might help Buckeye State
Dems if the governor’s race stays competitive.
Recruitment continues to be a struggle though, and the Democrats don’t
have the lineup quite yet to take on, say, Jon Runyan in New Jersey’s marginal
third district (New Jersey is very averse to knocking out incumbents,
regardless of party) or Jeff Denham in California’s tenth district (the three
seats in California are really going to be a battleground for Nancy Pelosi, as
delivering this trio in her home state would go a long way in her fight to get
the Speaker’s gavel). Look for the
Democrats to start looking for former state legislators and self-funders soon
in some of these seats, as they have not put enough districts in play at this
point to legitimately discuss winning back the House.
St. Rep. Jeff Wardlaw |
Hope for a National Headwind: The
Democrats are not going to win back the House without some sort of wind to
their backs. Democrats, as a
general rule, do poorer in Midterm elections (if the number of Democrats who
vote in presidential races voted in off-year elections, it would be the
Republicans who were 17-seats short this year). Without the added benefit of a national candidate to rally
behind, the Democrats have to rely on a combination of retail politics and
geographical advantages. A
national headwind, though, with a clear message would help
dramatically. In 2006, that
message was the Iraq War and Hurricane Katrina (helped the Democrats) and in
2010 it was Obamacare (helped the Republicans). What the issue in 2014 is is anyone’s guess (Syria,
anyone?), but one that favors the Democrats would help exponentially, and more
than anything else on this list.
Tea Party Advantage: It’s
hard to keep track of the number of seats that the Republicans have lost in the
past two cycles due to the Tea Party movement and conservative rhetoric that
didn’t sell with the electorate.
Everyone from Christine O’Donnell to Allen West to Todd Akin has cost Republicans valuable seats that would have otherwise gone to them. House primaries are always less evident at this point than Senate primaries, but with the Tea Party movement still relatively strong, it's safe to assume that the Tea Party could put at least 1-2 otherwise safe districts in danger. If they happen to be in a seat like Frank LoBiondo's or Ileana Ros-Lehtinen's, this would help the Democrats exponentially.
There's Always Room for a Scandal: The final piece of the puzzle the Democrats have no control over: every cycle there's at least one seat that falls because of a scandal. Last cycle, it was Anthony Weiner's sexting idiocy. As people's opinions of politicians continue to deteriorate, their tolerance level for politicians goes up (how else to explain that at one point Weiner led the NYC mayor's race), but without fail, every year at least one major seat disappears because the incumbent does something spectacularly stupid (or occasionally criminal). Again, without a wave, this is a numbers game, and every little bit helps, so that scandal happening to the GOP would get the Democrats 1-2 steps closer.
And that's where we'll leave it for the House races (for now-we'll have more as the election nears). What are your thoughts-do you think that the Democrats can pull off winning the House? What is the race that no one is talking about that will suddenly be on everyone's radar? Share in the comments!
No comments:
Post a Comment