This morning it seems that everyone in Hollywood got
nominated for an Emmy Award.
Seriously, with a 43-page word document full of lucky contenders, you
might want to head over to the Emmy website to see if should be dress-shopping. As this has basically turned into Emmy
week on the blog, I thought it only appropriate to discuss some of the high and
lowlights of this morning’s announcement.
The Good
The best nominations are almost always the ones that you
didn’t expect. I may be rooting
for someone like Adam Driver or Peter Dinklage to get nominated, but the
reality is that I expected those citations. Therefore, the best nomination of the morning surely had to
be Kate McKinnon over in Best Supporting Actress in a Comedy. McKinnon has been the best reason to
turn into Saturday Night Live in the
past few years what with her killer celebrity impressions and musical numbers,
and I’m ecstatic to see that Emmy, who occasionally gets a bit starry-eyed
(they usually only go for the household names like Amy Poehler or Kristin Wiig
from SNL) with their nominations
noticed her. Double kudos to her
nomination for writing the lyrics for the funniest skit in years for the show :
“Twin Bed.”
I also have to applaud when Emmy notices someone who has
been killer on her show for years.
Usually the Emmys only honor the same actors from a show over and over
and over again rather than bringing in new blood or honoring other cast
members, so Lena Headey’s nomination for her dynamite season on Game of Thrones is a wonderful surprise.
I also have to say just in general that while the
nominations are frequently repetitive, there are so many quality options on
television these days that Emmy has a harder time making a lot of
mistakes. I mean, Mad Men and Breaking Bad are back in Best Series, but it’s hard to argue with
this.
And though I don’t watch it, all of the women getting
nominated for Orange is the New Black is
awesome. A breakthrough show
that’s female-centric and critical acclaimed doesn’t always guarantee
nominations, particularly when the show isn’t brimming with stars, so
kudos. And I think it might be
able to take Modern Family.
The Confusing
I have never understood how Emmy decides the number of
nominees in each category.
Honestly, how is it that Miniseries gets six nominations (including for
the flop Bonnie and Clyde) whereas
Television Movie only has five? It
makes very little sense.
I also HATE what the Best Guest Actor races have
become. Beau Bridges, Diana Rigg,
Robert Morse, and Gary Cole are all regulars on their particular shows-how can
they qualify here? And those are
just the ones I know about-when it seems like only the SNL hosts are true guest stars, you need to reevaluate how this
category functions and what it’s for (I vote no more than two episode
appearances to qualify, personally).
The Bad
I have never been a big fan of what Robin Wright is doing in
House of Cards, particularly when you
put it next to what Elisabeth Moss consistently accomplishes on Mad Men. I know that Wright is critically-acclaimed, but that show
and performance leave me utterly cold and I would have preferred a citation for
Peggy.
Also, The Big Bang
Theory is in a serious rut, and while I like the show, it has nothing on
the creative juices running through something like Girls (or if it was classified as a comedy, Looking). I know it
makes mountains of money, but isn’t it time to retire the show or expect
something less repetitive from it?
The Ugly
None of the nominees, quite frankly, scream out “ugly!” There are a few shows that I don’t care
for that got nominated and there are a few shows I haven’t seen for a reason,
but by-and-large this isn’t a bad list.
I am on record as not liking Ricky Gervais, so that’s probably the one
I’m most annoyed by, but I admittedly don’t watch that show (which I thought
was critically-maligned, so even more puzzling).
What I hate though, is Entertainment
Weekly’s coverage of the Emmys.
HATE!!!! The reason for this is because
there is no greater awards show pet peeve that I have than when people complain
about a snub and don’t point out who should go in their place (or complain
about the show they haven’t watched in years shouldn’t have gotten nominated
even though they have no way of knowing if the past season was any good). I personally am stunned that the
supporting women on Girls cannot seem
to get nominated, but I’m not complaining about it because there’s not really a
bad nominee in that field (I don’t watch Mom,
but I do have a soft spot for Alison Janney and hear she is the MVP) and the
ones that I would cut I don’t really watch. You cannot complain about Charles Dance not getting
nominated unless you’re willing to state who shouldn’t have been nominated in
that very strong field. EW used to have the guts to do something
like point out which actors didn’t deserve their nominations, but now they just
suck up and say who should have received nominations, and I will have none of
it because you can’t have and don’t need 7,8,9 nominations (I don’t even go
over there anymore for awards coverage, but I wanted to double check that they
still do this stupid activity…and they do).
No comments:
Post a Comment