Sen. Kay Hagan (D-NC): The Most Important Senator of 2014? |
The problem, though, for pundits and analysts is that
there’s no specific set of races that are obvious when it comes to which seats
will turn. Mathematically it seems
that the momentum is with the Republicans, but the question is what seats are
the ones that magically add up to six to get the majority, and perhaps more
importantly, how many more seats can the Republicans grab to insulate
themselves from 2016, when the map takes a decided turn against their majority?
Almost everyone agrees that South Dakota, Montana, and West
Virginia are goners for the Democrats.
Montana Sen. John Walsh seems to still be well-received by Washington
Democrats and Natalie Tennant has finally gotten some fire into her campaign,
but neither have seen any sorts of polls headed in their direction to make us
assume these won’t get the Republicans halfway to their goal.
The four Democratic senators running in Romney states are
the seats most cited as the next most likely to contribute to the majority for
the Republicans, and when it comes to reaching six, there’s a decent chance
that they will be the ones that do it, but none of the races have entered slam
dunk territory. A lot depends on
what the Democrats can do to draw distinctions with the President. Even a five-point jump in the
President’s national approval could make a world of difference for Kay Hagan
(NC), Mark Begich (AK), Mary Landrieu (LA), and Mark Pryor (AR), but they are
definitely the four senators that will decided whether or not Harry Reid
remains in charge.
If larger momentum stays with the Republicans, they could
well all go to the Republicans, but if you look at each individual race the
Democrats have reason for optimism.
Arkansas has long been the outlier of these races, but polling has
closed so that Rep. Tom Cotton is within the margin of error of Pryor. Still, Pryor is certainly not Blanche
Lincoln, and continues to maintain a better retail politicking style than his Republican opponent (switch their labels and Pryor would be clobbering Cotton). Mary Landrieu seems to be in tougher
shape than Pryor, but the dynamics of her race are very strange because of the
runoff that Louisiana has if no candidate reaches 50%-she’s buoyed by the fact
that she’s the only candidate with a
shot of winning outright in November, and with another minor candidate dropping
out (even if it’s a Republican), she is helped. Mark Begich has arguably the toughest demographics of the
bunch (even in good years with good candidates, Alaska rarely goes blue for a
federal office). Begich, though,
is running a stellar campaign that even Republicans are worried about. And finally, there’s Hagan, arguably
the least of these candidates, but the one who has slowly emerged as the safest
of the bunch. Polling has shown
her gaining on some really poor polls earlier this year and with one candidate
to focus on, the Democrats have started to run a more cohesive campaign.
Rep. Bruce Braley (D-IA) |
Michigan, on the other hand, has also shifted toward the
Democrats in recent days. Terri
Lynn Land, a former statewide officer running as a Republican (she was
Secretary of State) has run a better campaign than one would expect, but Rep.
Gary Peters has reclaimed the lead in the race, and the blue nature of this
state (and Peters strong numbers with women) give him an edge and arguably this
is the least competitive seat of these three right now.
Republicans like to say things like New Hampshire, Virginia,
Minnesota, and Oregon, but none of these races seem to have materialized and
the incumbents have the edge. This
could change, especially if the national environment shifts against the
President, but these are worth paying attention to, but not worth talking about
flipping.
I’d like to point out, though, that these blue states are
key for the Republicans as a barometer for success in the future. The Democrats in these states (with the
exception of perhaps Braley) appear to be ahead right now, despite a national
environment that should be bringing them down. This is important, because these states are going to be
crucial for a Republican to take the White House in 2016. While the loss of the Senate would be
big for the Republicans, that doesn’t mean that it would make a lot of
difference for actual legislation.
It would just mean the buck would stop at Barack Obama’s desk rather
than Harry Reid’s. If the
Republicans cannot translate Iowa and Colorado in particular to their side, how
likely is it for them to be able to win it 2016 when higher turnout will favor
Democrats? Not very likely.
Finally, it’s always worth pointing out that the Republicans
do have seats to defend, even if they’re small in number. For a while there it seemed like
Georgia might be one of those such seats, but Michelle Nunn, despite a strong
campaign, is looking less and less likely to be following in her father’s
footsteps. The Republicans avoided
the Todd Akins in their race, and appear on-track to elect the better of the
two Republicans (Jack Kingston) in the runoff. This seat is starting to turn into New Hampshire in terms of
the Democrats’ ability to pick it up.
Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes (D-KY) |
So, finally, it’s time to answer the question of where’s the
wall? It’s not where either the
Democrats or the Republicans would like, quite frankly. With seats to defend in Wisconsin,
Illinois, Pennsylvania, and New Hampshire two years from now, the Republicans
cannot reasonably hope to keep their majority past 2017 if they only win six
seats this cycle, but that’s roughly where they look to be headed in
November. Meanwhile, the Democrats
cannot be happy that they have Braley in particular still completely in the
fray. I’d argue at this point that
the Republicans would pick-up AK, WV, LA, SD, AR, and MT (Begich and Pryor having the
best shot at comebacks), and the wall is now a combination of
KY/IA/NC. Republicans would need just one of these seats to win, but which one? Headed toward Labor
Day, these three races are the ones to watch to see who is building a stronger
wall.
No comments:
Post a Comment