Gov. Jan Brewer (R-AZ) |
All right-I’ve been a bit lax recently with my posting (a bit would actually be wildly
generous). But February has sort
of consumed my life, and travel, work, the Olympics, and dating have all taken
over my free time, so I haven’t been able to devote the time I would have hoped
to the blog (this exact thing happened last year-perhaps I should remember this
twelve months from now that February is a free time suck).
But March is coming, and for the blog it’s coming in like a lion, as I
want to write more posts, starting with today’s. I know that this could be moot by as soon as a few hours
from now, since Gov. Jan Brewer is almost certain to announce her support or
opposition to SB1062 in the next 48 hours, and my gut is telling me it will be
the latter considering the overwhelming cover she has from the business
community and her state’s two Republican senators supporting a veto. That being said, though, it says
something that SB1062 was able to be passed at all, and considering other
like-minded bills floating through the concaves of the Republican Party, it
calls into question what the GOP needs to start doing on gay rights.
I’m not going to argue whether the bill is a good idea or not-it’s
clearly a terrible idea on nearly all fronts. People are generally sympathetic of the religious struggles
people encounter when it comes to gay marriage and their beliefs, particularly
when they are civilians and not politicians (if you can’t make up your mind as
a politician, don’t run for such an office). However, only a moron would assume that they could refuse
service to a GLBT citizen and not endure some sort of backlash from the
community at large. Maybe I’m
being a bit naïve here (I obviously have heard stories of florists or
photographers refusing to work at gay weddings, and businesses like Chick-fil-A
and Papa John’s are still around), but even the most conservative areas of the
country have a sole purpose in business-to make more money. I am openly gay and live in a
relatively liberal part of the country, but last weekend I went to a deep red
state. I was still openly gay, and
yet when I bought gas, groceries, and food at a restaurant, I was never once
asked about my sexual orientation, and that’s because the people I was
interacting at these businesses didn’t care. They only cared that I could pay for the goods and services
that I was purchasing. That’s the
whole point of business.
And that’s what John McCain and Jeff Flake and the Arizona Chamber of
Commerce and hundreds of typically and reliably conservative leaders are aware
of as well-this could take a serious hit on the Arizonan economy. Look at happened when the state pulled
a similar stunt with not allowing MLK Day to be a federal holiday in 1992,
which resulted in them losing the Cowboys/Bills Super Bowl. A similar event could well happen if
Brewer doesn’t veto the bill this next year, as Arizona is scheduled to host
Super Bowl XLIX next year in Glendale.
It’s also worth noting that this would be a large hit on the businesses
of the state, and the reputation of the state’s business community. How will it help with recruiting talent
from other states to come and work for you if you have a harsh anti-gay law on
the books? Why would gay tourists
consider visiting your state (and Arizona in particular relies heavily on
tourism dollars)?
And what does it say now about the Republican Party that this is the direction
they’re taking with the anti-gay (for lack of a better term) movement. The other major gay news of the week
was Jack Burkman’s bizarre and pointless move to try and get Congress to ban
gay men from competing in the NFL, spurred by the likelihood that Michael Sam
will become the first openly gay member of the league. The bill has no hope of passing through
Congress (it’d struggle even in the Republican-led House, and I’m guessing
Harry Reid would take personal pleasure throwing it in the garbage if it made
it to the Senate), and likely will just put Republican lawmakers into extremely
uncomfortable positions in the “do I have more of a risk in a primary or a
general election,” and will surely give senate candidates like Steve Daines
heartburn.
The reality is, though, that with the GOP controlling a host of
governor’s mansions and state legislatures, this is an issue that is not going
away. Even if Brewer vetoes the
bill, there’s definitely going to be a high-profile state that pushes such a
bill claiming religious freedom.
Heck, look at how many states don’t actually ban employment
discrimination even today or how State Sen. Al Melvin, one of the chief
proponents for the bill, is running to replace Brewer in November’s election. This is probably going to get worse
before it gets better in red states, and I have to say, there’s a giant Midterm
election coming up that could put some fear into Republican governor’s who are
in support of such legislation.
Usually Democrats and gay-friendly supporters don’t have a lot of
options in one-sided elections, but that’s not the case in a host of Romney-won
states this year. Major
gubernatorial elections in dark red states such as Kansas, Texas, South
Carolina, and of course Arizona, as well as Senate races in West Virginia,
Montana, Arkansas, North Carolina, Louisiana, Georgia, Kentucky, and Alaska are
all surefire ways to say that you don’t support a bill like this. I know that Brewer could well veto the
law, but it says something that this did indeed pass the legislature, and that
your vote does matter severely in this particular fight. So cast it well.
No comments:
Post a Comment