The Republican Party has problems…and so do the Democrats. We’ll get there a bit next week with
the latter at least for an end-of-the-year retrospective. However, I couldn’t let this one pass
because it’s been festering in my mind for a while now.
While we oftentimes hear about the humanitarian work of former Presidents
(the Carter Center, Points of Light, the Clinton Foundation), most former
congressional leaders don’t go that route. While they have reached the peak of their profession (or one
short if they were stuck in the minority), they don’t have the seven-figure
book deals and six-figure speaking deals to sustain their pocketbooks, and
frequently will spend a few years trying to cash in on their wealth of
connections in Washington before heading back to their home state to issue the
occasional obituary press release and have post offices named after them.
You see this with people like Dick Armey, who made millions for DLA
Piper. It’s true for Dick
Gephardt, who sold his soul giving in on every principle he ever supported
during his decades in Congress (seriously, don’t hit that link unless you want
to cry). It’s probably true for
Denny Hastert (seriously-what is that man doing these days? Is he in Witness Protection or
something? How can someone so
prominent on the national stage so recently have disappeared so quickly from
the national conversation?) Trent
Lott and Tom Daschle both became millionaires as high-powered lobbyists. It’s even true for Tom DeLay, who decided
to supplement his income as a Dancing
with the Stars competitor. In
fact, the only former House leader who has stayed remotely involved in
electoral politics since he left office is Newt Gingrich.
Gingrich, of course, is not the same as these men in terms of his
notoriety. Well-known as Bill
Clinton’s public foil, he became the face of the Republican Party in the 90’s,
and thanks to his frequent sound-bytes, sharp intellect, and his ease with a
television interview, he’s stayed in the public eye.
Gingrich, unlike all of these men, decided to run for public office
after he left the House, in an ill-fated attempt to run in 2012 for the White
House. Gingrich was probably the
intellectual heavyweight of that race, but is far too unpopular from his
scandalous divorces and deeply questionable moral character. His public brawls with past wives and
his lesbian sister, along with his playing fast-and-loose with the truth and
his many financial improprieties have left him as poisoned goods on the
national stage.
And yet he’s still a major face in the Republican Party. The Democrats are able to drown out any
small-time politicians because by-and-large they have a polished sextet leading
the party: the Clintons, Obama, Biden, Pelosi, and Reid. Yes, Biden gets (frequent)
foot-in-mouth disease and occasionally so does Harry Reid, but they generally provide
a united front and the nice thing about them is that only two are ever going to
run for president again, and they seem relatively civil toward one
another. The Republican Party,
though, lacks that core leadership.
There’s no one in the GOP that can say something that will count as the
“overriding stamp” of the party.
If a rogue blue congressman say something unsavory, a quick rebut from
Obama or one of the Democratic leaders is all one needs to change the
story. Part of the reason why the Todd
Akins and Richard Mourdocks continue to be an issue for the party is that
there’s no one ready and famous-enough to condemn them and put the issue to
rest.
So perhaps Newt Gingrich is part of the problem, but he’s high profile
enough that he’d be a good way for the Republican Party to start cleansing its
past and looking to its future.
Like them or hate them, but the future of the GOP belong to people like
Paul Ryan, Chris Christie, Scott Walker, and possibly Ted Cruz (the jury’s
still out there). Gingrich hanging
onto the spotlight steals away precious coverage that could go to rebranding
the GOP. The former Speaker
constantly coming back into the spotlight and throwing verbal landmines at the
GOP is not helping them at all.
The Party needs to learn this and stop giving him the mantle-he might
still be able to fundraise, but keeping someone like Gingrich (who you just
know has a Newt 2016 logo being designed somewhere) as one of the faces of the
party is damaging your brand, and allowing it to stay in the past.
No comments:
Post a Comment