And now, we get to the boys' names.
Based on almost all of the press coverage, it seems the odds are that the child
is a girl, but were it to be a boy, these are the Top 10 (I took a judgment
call on the final slot).
Source: George is about as common of a name as you can get in British
royal circles. There have been
thus far six kings that sport the name, including Queen Elizabeth II’s father
and grandfather, and the rumor is that Prince Charles will forego being called
King Charles III in favor of being King George VII.
Pro: There’s a great amount of goodwill surrounding the name. King George VI was universally popular
during World War II, and this would be a great way to honor the Queen, who was
quite fond of her father.
Con: It’s a bit old-fashioned, obviously, and not all of the Georges
were created equally. King George
V’s son George, the Duke of Kent, was a notorious playboy who had a number of
affairs with well-known personalities (the rumors spread as vastly as Barbara
Cartland, Jessie Matthews, Noel Coward, and Prince Ferdinand of Prussia). He was also potentially the father of a
number of people out of wedlock, including Michael Canfield, Lee Radziwill’s
first husband.
2. James
Source: James has been the name of two British monarchs, as well as
seven Scottish kings, most recently James II of England (a seventeenth century
king). Kate Middleton’s younger
brother is also named James, as is Princess Diana's great-grandfather.
Pro: It’s a name steeped in both English and Scottish tradition, which
is a good thing for British unity as the Scottish independence movement remains
strong.
Con: The biggest one is that Will’s cousin is also named James (the
Viscount Severn, or depending on how you handle the Letters Patent debate that
surround the Earl of Wessex’s children, HRH Prince James, The Viscount
Severn, and yes, I side with the latter). There is also the fact
that King James II did not get along well with Parliament (there’s a reason
they stopped using his name for a number of years. Additionally, Jacobitism, a period when there was a struggle
with Hanoverians (the current British dynasty) and the Stuarts (the previous
dynasty), started with James Francis Edward Stuart, so there’s a bit of a sting
to the current monarchs.
Source: There has oddly not been a King Andrew in Britain (Hungary has
had several), so this will be based on two Princes that are closely related to
Prince William. First, there is
his uncle, Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, the younger brother of Prince
Charles. Secondly, there is
William’s great-grandfather, the father of Prince Philip, Prince Andrew of
Greece and Denmark. Andrew is also
an exceedingly common middle name in the royal family.
Pro: It’s classic, but not entirely dated. The name has risen in prominence within the Royal Family in
recent years.
Con: The Duke of York is hardly a royal that one would want to emulate
(he has courted controversy, along with his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson, for most of
his adult life), and Prince Andrew of Greece and Denmark's reputation has not enjoyed the sterling
nature that his wife Princess Alice’s has.
4. Arthur
Source: Obviously, the most famous Arthur was one that may never have
existed, and sailed off centuries ago into Avalon. In addition, Queen
Victoria had a son who was named Prince Arthur, who was Duke of Connaught and
Strathearn (her last living son), and he had a son named Arthur who was
Governor-General of South Africa in the 1920’s. Also, Arthur is one of Prince William’s three middle names.
Pro: Though history has long debated whether Arthur was indeed a real
person (much less a king), there is little doubt that his name has great
reverence within the canons of both British myth and literature. We still allude to Camelot when we
refer to everyone from the Kennedys to the Obamas in America, and the world
likely views Kate and Will in a similar way.
Con: Being the first undisputed King Arthur would be a major burden to
place onto a child.
5. Harold
Source: You’d have to go back quite a ways, but Harold was indeed the
name of two British kings. The
last one was the man who lost the Battle of Hastings, Harold II, who died in
1066. Modern uses of the name are
considerably sparser (Harald V, the King of Norway, is a second cousin of Queen
Elizabeth II through his grandmother Princess Maud of Wales, but that’s about
it).
Pro: It’s definitely unusual, and would give British historians
something to crow about (this time a Harold succeeding a William instead of
vice versa a century ago).
Con: Little Baby Harold?
Seriously?
Source: I’m clearly partial to this one, though the only British
monarch that sported the name was King John, generally considered one of the
Britain’s worst kings. Kate
Middleton has three great-great grandfathers who sported the name, and John is
the name of William’s grandfather (on Diana’s side), which is likely the source
of this name in the press.
Pro: This is probably the best way that William could pay homage to his
mother if the child is a boy and still stick to a name that is common with the
British monarchy.
Con: John is a fairly cursed name in the British family. In addition to King John, there’s John
of Gaunt, perhaps the most significant man in the British Royal Family that
never managed to take the throne, and most recently, Prince John, Queen
Elizabeth’s young uncle who died at age thirteen from a seizure.
7. Joseph
Source: While Portugal and Spain have had leaders named Joseph, Britain
has not. The only person I can
find in recent memory that has a clear blood connection to the British Royal
Family with this name is a young prince of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha who was born in
Brazil and died at age nineteen (he would be a third cousin of King George
V). I can find no connections in
the Middleton or Spencer families to the name (if you know any that I’m
missing, share in the comments).
Pro: It’s definitely a unique name, and one that would standout (who
wouldn’t want a Prince Joe?)
Con: It has so little to do with the Royal Family, unless I’m missing
something, it seems really unusual
that they would go so out of the box.
Source: There’s no shortage of King Louis’s (France has roughly twenty
of them, depending on how you count some of the later ones), but your best bet
to find a direction to Will and Kate is through Prince Louis of Battenburg, who
was the grandfather of Prince Philip (and he also married a granddaughter of
Queen Victoria). In addition to
this, one of William’s middle names is Louis.
Pro: This is another way to honor Prince Philip. There seems to be quite an assumption
that any male children would be honoring the Duke of Edinburgh, whom Prince
William is very close with, and so this seems like a plausible guess.
Con: Louis is so completely associated with the French monarchy, it’s
hard to believe they’d go this route.
9. Philip
Source: Prince Philip is obviously the inspiration for this, as he is
Prince William’s grandfather, and as we just mentioned, a favorite of the Duke
of Cambridge’s. Philip is
also the final of William’s three middle names.
Pro: This is a great way to honor the Royal Family’s current patriarch,
and it’s a name that has been added with great gusto to the Royal Family
lexicon since the Queen married the Greek prince.
Con: It’s a bit on-the-nose, isn’t it? I mean, despite it’s spot at ninth place, wouldn’t we all
assume this is the name they’d go with?
I’m betting they want to get outside the box.
Source: This is actually in a three-way tie with Richard and Benjamin,
but the former doesn’t seem likely and the latter seems a bit
out-of-nowhere. So I’ll go with
Charles, which is of course the name of Prince William’s father, and the next
monarch of England. It's also the name of Princess Diana's younger brother. In addition,
this is one of Prince Harry’s middle names, and as the princes are quite close,
would be a way for Will and Kate to honor the “spare heir.”
Pro: Charles is a very traditional name in the monarchy, and this would be a wonderful way to pay tribute to William's father. Naming a child after a father or grandfather is very common in the Royal Family.
Con: This doesn't seem as in-fashion these days as it was a hundred years ago, and there's a lot of bad will with the previous two King Charles.
Con: This doesn't seem as in-fashion these days as it was a hundred years ago, and there's a lot of bad will with the previous two King Charles.
And Finally, One More Name I'm Surprised Isn't In the Mix...Albert
Source: The name I’m most stunned they’re missing is Albert. The connotations are pretty
obvious-Prince Albert was a well-loved spouse of Queen Victoria, and therefore
the ancestor of every blood member of the Royal Family. In addition, Albert is one of Prince
Harry’s middle names.
Pro: Though Britain has yet to have a King Albert, it may be the most
common name to not get to the throne, at least in the last few centuries.
Con: Do you have Prince Albert in a can?
No comments:
Post a Comment