Showing posts with label Ward Bond. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ward Bond. Show all posts

Monday, January 02, 2023

Saturdays with the Stars Season 4 Finale

Two of our stars this year, Lucille Ball & Ann Sothern
We ended the year on a Saturday (a first for our series), so I wasn't able to get this recap out in 2022 like we normally do, but I didn't want to finish our fourth season of Saturdays with the Stars without our annual recap.  While we are headed into a new season this coming Saturday focusing on western stars, I would be remiss if we didn't take a moment to talk through actors in television, and what I learned from our fourth season.

This year was really interesting for me for a couple of reasons.  For starters, it was really the first season where I didn't have "stars" at the center, and of course it was our first season with men.  As a result, there were actors this year where I was watching a movie where they barely showed up, character actors in Old Hollywood being harder to track their "most significant" roles.  As a result, our annual discussion below of "favorite performances" I ended up in some cases having less options.

But I also kind of loved that, as it underlined the main thesis of this year: that television gave these performers an opportunity that movies simply couldn't.  Some of these actors had great potential, but the public (or the studio heads) couldn't see it for what it was, and TV brought that talent out in them.  Others, quite frankly, needed the banality of television compared to the "make an impact every time" culture of movies because their star personas weren't as curated.  We'll be getting back to star culture in 2023 (while they might occasionally take supporting parts depending on our film, all 12 of our stars this year are generally considered to be "leading players"), I won't forget that lesson as I continue to watch the twelve stars we watched this past year in other films in the decades to come.  Below, I have created a little list celebrating the best of this year's stars.  Thank you so much to everyone who joined us for part or all of this year's season-I'm excited to have you back for season five's "When Cowboys Ruled Hollywood"!: 

Favorite Performance from Each Star 

January: Lucille Ball-Dance. Girl. Dance.
February: Jack Benny-George Washington Slept Here
March: Eve Arden-Comrade X
April: Ann Sothern-Lady in a Cage
May: Robert Young-They Won't Believe Me
June: Spring Byington-BF's Daughter
July: Loretta Young-Midnight Mary
August: John Payne-Silver Lode
September: Ward Bond-The Wings of Eagles
October: Walter Brennan-Come and Get It
November: Donna Reed-The Last Time I Saw Paris
December: Barbara Stanwyck-Baby Face

5 Favorite Performers (Alphabetical, and based solely on the films we watched as a collective & not on the rest of their careers)


5 Favorite Performances of the Year (Alphabetical)

Lucille Ball, Dance. Girl. Dance.
Barbara Stanwyck, Baby Face
Barbara Stanwyck, The Furies
Ann Sothern, Lady in a Cage
Loretta Young, Midnight Mary

10 Favorite Films of the Year (Alphabetical)


Top 10 Performances of the Year (Not By Our Stars...and Yes, Alphabetical)

Judith Anderson, The Furies
James Caan, Lady in a Cage
Olivia de Havilland, Lady in a Cage
Susan Hayward, They Won't Believe Me
Walter Huston, The Furies
Edward G. Robinson, The Stranger
John Wayne, Rio Bravo
Orson Welles, The Stranger

Saturday, September 24, 2022

Rio Bravo (1959)

Film: Rio Bravo (1959)
Stars: John Wayne, Dean Martin, Ricky Nelson, Angie Dickinson, Walter Brennan, Ward Bond
Director: Howard Hawks
Oscar History: No nominations
Snap Judgment Ranking: 4/5 stars

Each month, as part of our 2022 Saturdays with the Stars series, we highlight a different Classical Hollywood star who made their name in the early days of television.  This month, our focus is on Ward Bond: click here to learn more about Mr. Bond (and why I picked him), and click here for other Saturdays with the Stars articles.

Ward Bond, as we talked about throughout this month, never really became a leading man on the big screen despite being in classic movies as diverse as It's a Wonderful Life and Gone with the Wind.  He did, however, get a chance to play the leading man on television, starting in 1957 with NBC's Wagon Train.  The show, which had Bond playing wagon master, was inspired by two previous movies, The Big Trail (1930) which is famous for launching the career of John Wayne and Wagon Master (1950), which featured longtime western star Ben Johnson.  Both films also featured Ward Bond, though in supporting parts.  In this series, Bond played Major Seth Adams, who on the trail would meet loads of different famous guest stars from Bond's film days like John Carradine, Ernest Borgnine, Linda Darnell, & Rhonda Fleming.  During this time, though, Bond didn't stop making movies, and he appeared in one major classic during this era, his final film with John Wayne, this time directed by Howard Hawks instead of John Ford: Rio Bravo.

(Spoilers Ahead) Rio Bravo is about Sheriff John T. Chance (Wayne), who has recently imprisoned the brother of a notorious land baron for murder after getting into a fight with Dude (Martin), a town drunk.  We learn soon after that Dude is a former deputy of Chance's who has fallen on hard times since he took to the bottle, and along with the aging Stumpy (Brennan), is pretty much the entire town's law enforcement.  This becomes a problem when it's clear that the land baron is coming to get his brother out of jail, and so Chance, after initially refusing the help of his old friend Pat Wheeler (Bond), who dies soon after Chance refuses him, starts to take on more help, including Wheeler's apprentice Colorado (Nelson) and a beautiful woman who has just come to town named Feathers (Dickinson).  Together, they overcome the odds to beat the land baron, and in the process Dude gets a second lease on life, and Chances & Feathers become romantically involved.

Rio Bravo was seen in many ways as a rebuttal to the 1952 classic High Noon, which featured Gary Cooper trying to find someone to help him in a town that doesn't want to get involved.  High Noon was written by Carl Foreman, who was eventually blacklisted, and many view it as a metaphor for the blacklisting that happened in Hollywood during this time frame.  John Wayne, of course, was one of the main instigators during the HUAC investigations, and likely didn't take too kindly to his beloved western being used as political metaphor (even though, the further he went in his career, Wayne's finest films generally did slip into liberal metaphor in pictures like The Searchers and The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance).  As a result, Rio Bravo is a movie about unlikely allies coming together for a common cause (the irony of our modern political movement being that both High Noon AND Rio Bravo would be considered to have a "woke" message by today's standards).

The thing both movies have in common is they're both excellent.  Rio Bravo is filled with strong performances.  John Wayne, three years after The Searchers (by pretty much every measure, the pinnacle of his career as an actor), had largely eschewed westerns, but this was his way of acknowledging (after a string of flops) that he would never escape the Wayne persona, and so he'd find new ways to say something about it (Liberty Valance, True Grit, and The Shootist would all fall under this umbrella).  Here we see him having the last major film romance of his career, and honestly it kind of works despite his age difference with Dickinson.  Wayne was a byproduct of the studio system, perhaps one of its best myths, while Dickinson was a quintessentially modern woman for the 1960's...that shoe leather & mini skirt combination works really well in an oil-and-water sort of way, and I liked it.  Throw in a great film score (seriously-some of Dean Martin's most romantic onscreen singing with songs like "My Rifle, My Pony, and Me") and beautiful western cinematography, and you have a true classic.

Bond has only a small part.  True-to-form, Bond's billing is a bit higher than what he was able to achieve, and once again he's just doing his character actor duty.  Bond's time in the sun on Wagon Train was very bright (it was at one point the highest-rated show on television), but brief.  In 1960, he died unexpectedly of a heart attack at the age of 57; John Wayne, his costar of 22 films, gave the eulogy at his funeral.  Next month, we're going to talk about a contemporary of Bond's, another character actor who made his mark in westerns (including some with Bond himself) but who unlike Bond, would receive critical accolades that would make him far more of a household name before he found his way onto America's TV screens.

The Wings of Eagles (1957)

Film: The Wings of Eagles (1957)
Stars: John Wayne, Dan Dailey, Maureen O'Hara, Ward Bond
Director: John Ford
Oscar History: No nominations
Snap Judgment Ranking: 1/5 stars

Each month, as part of our 2022 Saturdays with the Stars series, we highlight a different Classical Hollywood star who made their name in the early days of television.  This month, our focus is on Ward Bond: click here to learn more about Mr. Bond (and why I picked him), and click here for other Saturdays with the Stars articles.

With apologies to Ward Bond, I took a vacation this month, and so while we will get the full gamut of articles for him (he'll have a second film this afternoon), he'll only get two Saturday's.  Maybe this is okay though.  Ward Bond is an unusual star primarily because he wasn't.  We'll talk this afternoon about what it was like for Bond to briefly step into the spotlight in Wagon Train on television, but despite being in over a hundred movies, most of them with marquee stars from big studios, he almost always plays a small part in those films.  This was why I was excited for Wings of Eagles. It isn't because he has a big part (indeed, it's arguably the smallest role he'll have in our four films this month), but instead it was exciting because it might be the best performance we've seen from him all September.  Sadly, the movie that surrounds it is a complete dud.

(Spoilers Ahead) The movie focuses on the life of real-life naval aviator Spig Wead (Wayne), who is trying to prove that the Navy should value aviation in combat.  He does endurance races to achieve this, which means that his wife Min (O'Hara) and family are left at home, oftentimes for years at a time while he is off pursuing his professional ambitions.  After falling down a flight of stairs, he is paralyzed & rejects his family further, only hanging with his buddies in the navy like Jughead (Dailey), who finally are able to convince him to "move that toe" (seriously-there is a five-minute sequence of Dailey & Wayne singing and chanting "Move that toe" over-and-over to the point where you think it was a running joke or an inside drinking game between the two actors).  After this, he becomes a Hollywood screenwriter, even meeting famed director John Dodge (Bond), before eventually going back into the Navy one last time, before suffering a heart attack and being forced to fully retire from active duty.

The movie is not strong, and it's honestly the dullest John Ford movie I've ever seen (seriously-Ford is almost always a good time as a moviegoer...I'm confused how his name is on the picture save for the call sheet & the last twenty minutes, where we see some decent combat footage that apparently includes some stuff from real-life).  Wayne & O'Hara, movie magic in other films, are barely in the picture together (O'Hara is sidelined for giant swaths of the picture), and it stretches a thin (if heroic) story past the point of patience.  Worst of the bunch is Dan Dailey, an annoying figure and with the possible exception of Mickey Rooney, my most-loathed Classical Hollywood leading man.

The movie is saved briefly by Bond, who gives the film's best performance, albeit in a very small cameo.  He plays a fictionalized version of the director, and it's a riot.  He even dresses like Ford did in real life (with the sunglasses and omnipresent pipe), and given their extremely long working relationship, you can tell this is both accurate and a gas for Bond, who honestly looks like he & Wayne are about to bust into a blooper real the entire time that Bond is onscreen, it's so much fun.  Had we focused on this relationship, this might've been the rare Ford comedy (and one that would work).  Alas, we're stuck with two hours of tepid war cinema around it.

Saturday, September 10, 2022

OVP: Mister Roberts (1955)

Film: Mister Roberts (1955)
Stars: Henry Fonda, James Cagney, William Powell, Jack Lemmon, Betsy Palmer, Ward Bond
Director: John Ford & Mervyn LeRoy
Oscar History: 3 nominations/1 win (Best Picture, Supporting Actor-Jack Lemmon*, Sound Recording)
Snap Judgment Ranking: 2/5 stars

Each month, as part of our 2022 Saturdays with the Stars series, we highlight a different Classical Hollywood star who made their name in the early days of television.  This month, our focus is on Ward Bond: click here to learn more about Mr. Bond (and why I picked him), and click here for other Saturdays with the Stars articles.

Ward Bond is unusual, as we've mentioned throughout this month, because he was a true character actor, and someone who, unlike say Thelma Ritter or Walter Brennan, he didn't get semi-lead roles and never was nominated for an Academy Award.  This makes him unusual because Ward Bond holds the distinction of starring in the most Best Picture nominees of any credited actor in the history of the Academy, more than even Jack Nicholson or Robert de Niro or Meryl Streep, with thirteen nominees ranging from Arrowsmith all the way back in 1931-32 to today's film, Mister Roberts, which was the final Best Picture nominee that Bond would appear in in his career.  Mister Roberts was famously a troubled shoot (John Ford fought with both James Cagney & Henry Fonda), one that involved not just two credited directors (Ford & Mervyn LeRoy), but Joshua Logan was uncredited, making Mister Roberts one of the only movies (outside Gone with the Wind) to be helmed by three different Oscar nominees.

(Spoilers Ahead) The movie takes place in the waning days of World War II, with a bunch of sailors stuck aboard a cargo ship called the Reluctant, where they are under the tyrannical rule of Captain Morton (Cagney).  Morton is frequently at odds with Mr. Roberts (Fonda), a lieutenant on the ship who is desperate to get off this ship, which is safely in a harbor but is not going to see battle, and join the front.  Roberts is frequently fighting on behalf of the men, who are desperate to get shore leave after a year at sea, but Morton wants to keep Roberts under his thumb, primarily because he knows what a bad commanding officer he has been & he doesn't want him to leak that to the brass.  Joined by his pals Doc (Powell) & Pulver (Lemmon), Roberts continues to hatch plans to get under Morton's skin and specifically to get a letter requesting his transfer as well as to get the men shore leave.  He initially has to sacrifice the former to get the latter, but once the men hear about it, the men risk court martial to get Roberts transferred.  The film ends on a bitter note, with Roberts dying in action, and Pulver (until that point something of a coward) standing up to Morton and assuming the antagonistic role that Roberts had played in his life, defending the men.

The movie was an "ehh" for me.  I get what's happening here & I understand why this was a successful play given its mix of tone, but the stage is a different beast and you don't have to feed off of an audience's energy in the same way.  As a result, the mixture of slapstick farce alongside a very serious story feels very off, and the tenor of the picture doesn't quite work.  The cast is a mixed bag-Fonda is good as a revered rule-breaker, even if the script demands nothing from him, but Cagney is actively bad here, not knowing how to play his villain as anything but a hammy Mickey Rooney-level joke.  Jack Lemmon, of course, won an Oscar for this role (his first of eight nominations), and while I get it (seeing Lemmon's signature ability with comedy for the first time had to have been undeniable), it feels weird that he won for something so dismissible, as this is hardly what he'd end up being capable of as he moved to being a leading man.

Mister Roberts was a big film for most of the cast.  Henry Fonda hadn't made a movie in eight years before this (he'd been on stage), and was not favored by Warner Brothers.  This movie was a huge hit, though, and its success brought Fonda back to Hollywood, and two years later he'd be making one of the most important movies of his career, 12 Angry Men.  James Cagney would never make another movie for Warner after this (his home for almost three decades) and William Powell wouldn't make another movie, period, even though he'd live another thirty years.  Ward Bond, of course, would continue to make movies and we'll talk about the most important one of his as an actor next week, but this week I'll admit that I continue to strike out.  While Bond is in this movie, he has a very small part, and so it's hard to really assess his talents as an actor with such a small role.

OVP: They Were Expendable (1945)

Film: They Were Expendable (1945)
Stars: Robert Montgomery, John Wayne, Donna Reed, Jack Holt, Ward Bond
Director: John Ford
Oscar History: 2 nominations (Best Sound Recording, Effects)
Snap Judgment Ranking: 4/5 stars

Each month, as part of our 2022 Saturdays with the Stars series, we highlight a different Classical Hollywood star who made their name in the early days of television.  This month, our focus is on Ward Bond: click here to learn more about Mr. Bond (and why I picked him), and click here for other Saturdays with the Stars articles.

All right, I'm aware I skipped the first week of Ward Bond (in the US last weekend was Labor Day and I had family in town & in the year of 2022 we focus on spending time with loved ones at the expense of our responsibilities-that's just the rules), but we won't be skimping on him today, as we're going to do our first ever double-feature so that he gets a full month of movies.  As a result, we're going to talk about a huge chapter of Ward Bond's career in the next few hours.  Bond started as a character actor, and largely stayed there.  Working in B-Grade films in the early 1930's, he did eventually graduate to A-Grade pictures, but almost always as a random "friend of the hero" or a villain of some sorts.  I watched They Were Expendable with my parents last weekend while they were in town, and at one point my mom said "why does he look so familiar?" and it's because Bond's real claim to fame is the breadth of his filmography, and just how many movies he's made.  Bringing Up Baby, Gone with the Wind, The Grapes of Wrath, The Maltese Falcon, It's a Wonderful Life, The Searchers...he is somehow in all of these landmark classics, but always as a bit player or side part.  I have seen all of these movies so I can't watch them for this project, but I'd be remiss if I didn't mention them as we kick off our month devoted to Bond, as he's a true character actor, though one who is familiar to virtually any person who has ever watched a classic film.

(Spoilers Ahead) Made in the waning days of World War II, They Were Expendable is the story of a team of men who command a squadron of US Navy PT Boats in the South Pacific.  Lt. John "Brick" Brickley (Montgomery) is sure that they will be an asset to the navy, but his commanding officers remain skeptical, and his friend Lt. JG "Rusty" Ryan (Wayne) is hoping to get his own command, and nearly goes for it when Pearl Harbor is bombed, throwing his entire world into chaos.  The film that follows shows the divergent paths these two men's careers take, with Brick becoming a war hero, his PT boat experience used to sink a Japanese cruiser, while Rusty (sidelined with blood poisoning) falls in love with a nurse named Sandy (Reed) on land, their romance doomed to failure both because it's impossible to fall into a longterm relationship while at war and because the evacuation of Bataan leaves Sandy behind, certain to die in the process.

This is where the title comes from, and where the most powerful scene in the movie is.  The war is not subtle about the "have's and have not's" of battle, with a large section of the film's middle devoted to the evacuation of General MacArthur into Australia while men around him perish to get him there.  The final scenes of the movie show that Brick & Rusty escape, but others, like Chief Mulcahey (Bond, who has a small part that is most notable for him crooning to Donna Reed through an open window...which he also more famously did in It's a Wonderful Life) are left to die.  Brick & Rusty are too valuable to the war effort to be left behind, even if the unmarried Rusty tries to switch with one of the married infantryman when there are not enough seats in the end of the movie.  It's a killer, rough ending particularly in an era where most WWII films were just populist propaganda, and on top of astounding cinematography and unreal visual effects, a really great forgotten epic.

The film was a critically-important one in the career of John Wayne, which I'd be remiss to not mention before we leave.  Wayne is the most famous WWII Hollywood draft dodger less because he was the only one to do it, and more because Wayne's onscreen persona frequently had him wearing a military uniform, thus making an odd juxtaposition to a man who never actually served.  This came to a head when director John Ford would berate Wayne, his longtime friend whom he thought a coward for skipping out on his patriotic duty, in front of the entire cast & crew of They Were Expendable.  Particularly when juxtaposed with his fellow leading man Robert Montgomery (who had been an ambulance driver at Dunkirk and rose to the level of lieutenant commander in the US Navy), Wayne made for easy mockery by Ford, and it took Montgomery eventually stepping in for the two men to finally make peace.  They would do so in the coming years alongside our star Ward Bond, who would make multiple movies with Ford & Wayne, one of which we'll discuss next week.

Thursday, September 01, 2022

Saturdays with the Stars: Ward Bond

Each month of 2022 we will be taking a look at one-time film actors who became foundational figures in the early days of television, stretching from the early 1950's into the mid-1960's.  Last month we talked about John Payne, a leading man of the 1940's who never really caught on in the way some of his peers did, and eventually ended up being part of the TV western trend of the late 1950's.  This month, we're going to talk about a performer who was also part of the television western trend of the late 1950's, on a series even more successful despite the fact that this actor, until he went to television, never had the leading man opportunities that Payne did.  This month's star is Ward Bond.

Born in Nebraska just after the turn of the century, Wardell Edwin Bond (called Ward for short) moved to Denver as a child where he graduated from high school.  While in college (where he was a noted football star), he made the acquaintance of two men that would change his life: fellow football player John Wayne and, after many football players on the USC team were cast in a film called Salute, film director John Ford.  While Wayne would become Ford's favorite leading man, it was Bond that would end up working with him the most, appearing in 25 of his movies in the coming decades.

Ward Bond, as I stated above, is not a leading man in any traditional sense, but you have seen him in movies even if you're the most casual of movie fan.  Bond has appeared in film classics as diverse as It Happened One Night, Bringing Up Baby, Gone with the Wind, It's a Wonderful Life, and The Searchers; in fact, he appeared in more of the AFI's "100 Years...100 Movies" list than any other actor, and was in thirteen films nominated for Best Picture (again, more than any other actor).  In total, Bond appeared n over 200 Hollywood movies throughout his decades-long career, putting him in the company of prolific actors like John Carradine (whom, he worked with in nine films, as well as several TV episodes).  Bond, though, rarely got the lead in any of these films, and it wasn't until Wagon Train in 1957 that he got to take centerstage as Major Seth Adams.  The series for NBC was a big hit, and would be Bond's successful swan song-he would die before the entire series was run, eventually having his character replaced by John McIntire.  This month, we're going to take a look at Bond's career as a character actor, highlighting some of the classics of his that I haven't seen, including one of the Best Picture nominees and at least one film that he made with both Ford & Wayne, trying to understand why it was he fit so well into the role of character actor...but couldn't jump to the top of the call sheet until he got to television.

Saturday, July 10, 2021

OVP: Joan of Arc (1948)

Film: Joan of Arc (1948)
Stars: Ingrid Bergman, Francis L. Sullivan, J. Carrol Naish, Ward Bond, Shepperd Strudwick, Gene Lockhart, John Emery, Leif Erickson, Cecil Kellaway, Jose Ferrer
Director: Victor Fleming
Oscar History: 7 nominations/2 wins (Best Actress-Ingrid Bergman, Supporting Actor-Jose Ferrer, Costume Design*, Cinematography*, Film Editing, Art Direction, Score...the film also won an Honorary Award for "distinguished service to the industry in adding to its moral statue in the world community," an Oscar producer Walter Wanger refused to pick up in protest of the film missing out in the Best Picture category)
Snap Judgment Ranking: 2/5 stars

Each month, as part of our 2021 Saturdays with the Stars series, we highlight a different one Alfred Hitchcock's Leading Ladies.  This month, our focus is on Ingrid Bergman-click here to learn more about Ms. Bergman (and why I picked her), and click here for other Saturdays with the Stars articles.

Last week we started our time devoted to Ingrid Bergman with For Whom the Bell Tolls, her first Oscar nomination.  As this series is focused on only films I haven't seen, we're going to skip over some crucial movies in Bergman's filmography today, but I want to give you an idea of where we were at at this point in her career.  By 1948, Bergman was one of the biggest & most celebrated stars in Hollywood.  She'd won her Oscar for 1944's Gaslight, and had massive hits in the form of Spellbound, The Bells of St. Mary's, Saratoga Trunk, and Notorious (two of which were directed by our mascot for the year, Alfred Hitchcock, but we'll talk more about them next week).  Basically, at this point in Bergman's career, she was untouchable-one of the most important stars in Hollywood, and the most beloved.  It made sense, therefore, for her to play a literal saint onscreen in Victor Fleming's Joan of Arc...and it would set up what would become one of the most crushing moments in celebrity worship a few years later when all of this would come crashing down as Bergman endured one of the biggest celebrity scandals of the Golden Age.  We'll get to that in the coming weeks...but first, let's look at Joan of Arc.

(Real Life Doesn't Need Spoiler Alerts) The film is a biopic loosely based on the life of Joan of Arc (Bergman), a teenage girl (Bergman was 33 in the film, playing someone who was 19...and she doesn't look nineteen so this plays as a bit ridiculous, yes) who sees visions of saints that say she must unite France and crown the Dauphin (Ferrer) as the king, uniting him against the British.  She inexplicably does this, using a private conversation with the Dauphin to convince him that he should put his army in her command.  After a series of victories, the Dauphin was crowned King Charles VII of France, but this comes at a price as he begins to argue with Joan, who thinks it is God's will that she unite France & drive the English out of Burgundy.  When she is captured, Charles does little to help her, and she is sentenced to death, burning at the stake.  It's worth noting that the film starts with Joan canonized (so even if you don't know what's coming, you know history celebrates her), which in 1948 was a fairly recent event-Joan of Arc wasn't canonized until the reign of Pope Benedict XV in 1920.

The film itself is kind of a textbook definition of what the Joan of Arc story is-there's not a lot of differentiation from what we know today, and in many ways this might have been one of the main ways the story infiltrated the American subconscious, particularly for non-Catholic viewers.  As a result, it's historically interesting but the plot reads as routine to a modern audience.  It doesn't help that Bergman is once again playing a sainted character with little variation.  Joan is steadfast & devout, which might make for appropriate conversation in a CCD class, but doesn't work in a two-and-a-half-hour movie.  Joan of Arc is proof once again that the Oscars rarely understood what made Bergman so captivating onscreen.  AMPAS regularly skipped over some of Bergman's most interesting work (Casablanca, Notorious) in favor of pious women who make use of Bergman's gorgeous, rich speaking voice but have little to say with it (not just Joan, but also For Whom the Bell Tolls, The Bells of St. Mary's, Anastasia, and Murder on the Orient Express).

The rest of the nominations are a mix.  The Cinematography, Art Direction, & Costuming are all great.  The lighting is good-we see an evolution from what really made Song of Bernadette sing here to have Bergman shot in a near perfect alabaster, as if some scenes are plucked out of an oil painting, and the set decoration is impressive if not quite differentiated enough to be truly mesmerizing (you're not going to be confused into thinking this isn't a soundstage).  The scoring is run-of-the-mill, which might work in a different year but 1948 had a lot of really excellent music so this just sort of sits there (it's hard to remember even moments after you see the picture).  The editing, well, it's long & repetitive, and it doesn't really know what to do with most of its scenes with men-in-power trying to take Joan down, particularly Ferrer's work as the Dauphin.  Ferrer as an actor is the opposite of Bergman-he generally seemed to overplay his hand, but here he might be a bit too subtle to make his king standout, and I left shocked that they noticed him (this was his screen debut).  There's something there, I'm not going to deny it (it's clear that Ferrer has a plan-of-action with his Dauphin, a weak-willed man of privilege who has no concept of how to be a great leader the way that Joan seems to be able to muster with no training), but a solid intuition below the surface cannot overcome that it just doesn't present onscreen.

Tuesday, November 24, 2020

OVP: Drums Along the Mohawk (1939)

Film: Drums Along the Mohawk (1939)
Stars: Claudette Colbert, Henry Fonda, Edna May Oliver, Eddie Collins, John Carradine, Ward Bond
Director: John Ford
Oscar History: 1 nomination (Best Supporting Actress-Edna May Oliver)...there's some confusion over whether this was also cited for Best Cinematography, and I'd love if someone reading this might help me out on what is "official" in terms of nominations, as IMDB and Inside Oscar list this as being of the nominees for Best Color Cinematography in 1939, but the AMPAS database officially doesn't list it, saying the only unofficial nominees were Gone with the Wind and The Private Lives of Elizabeth & Essex.  I defer to the AMPAS database as my source-of-truth for the OVP, but if anyone has more clarification or sources, I'd love to read them.
Snap Judgment Ranking: 1/5 stars

We're continuing on our week devoted to the Best Supporting Actress category with Drums Along the Mohawk, a massive hit from that year that seemed to sprout a classic every week: 1939.  The film might have major, Oscar-winning stars headlining it (Fonda & Colbert), but it was actually character actress Edna May Oliver who won her sole Oscar nomination for her work in the film.  Oliver was not that old when she played Mrs. McKlennar in the film (she was just 56, and was clearly made up to be much older in the picture), but at that point she'd had a long career in both the stage & in pictures.  She originally made her name in the Hildegarde Withers films (about a spinster sleuth, and yes, please sign me up to watch all of those as "spinster sleuth" is about as much of a calling card as I can get), but if you recognize her today at all it's probably from the 1940 Pride & Prejudice where she played the quintessential Austen villain, Lady Catherine De Bourgh.

(Spoilers Ahead) The film is set during the Revolutionary War, and follows a young couple who are trying their hand at frontier life.  Lana (Colbert), is from a wealthy family, while her new husband Gil (Fonda) comes from more modest means.  Initially when they move out, Lana struggles, even screaming when a Native American that is friends with Gil shows up at her door.  She starts to adjust to life working the land, and they begin a family (though of course there is the initial miscarriage that seemed to always happen in movies of this era).  When the family becomes unable to stay on their land (due to raids from unfriendly Native Americans, who are led by an Englishman played by John Carradine), they move in with Mrs. McKlennar (Oliver), a spinster who enjoys their company, though during a late raid she is shot by an arrow & killed, leaving her farm to the young couple.  The film ends with a gigantic fight that the men win, aided in no small part by Gil, and the announcement of a new country (America) when Cornwallis surrenders to Washington.

The movie was John Ford's first Technicolor movie, and if you know me at all, you know that I love John Ford, and the man knew how to make a beautiful film in Technicolor (just look at something like The Quiet Man or Fort Apache), and this looks gorgeous.  As I mentioned above, this was kind of nominated for Best Cinematography (the best I can tell it was on what would have been the 1939 equivalent of a bakeoff), and it deserves it-Colbert, in particular, looks radiant in the moonlight.  That said, the movie ages badly (and probably wasn't progressive even at the time) for their depictions of the Native Americans, somehow both portrayed as cruelly cunning & as oafish, and it pulls you out of the movie.  The leads, two I generally like, don't help at all.  Fonda plays the character too flat, and Colbert's part was somehow written by a woman (Sonya Levian) & still she behaves like a damsel-in-distress every chance she gets, screaming & fainting & whining.  It's a pretty ugly, dated movie, and one that has little enjoyment save for the Cinematography.

That includes Oliver's work.  Her Mrs. McKlennar is welcome relief, to be sure-this film needs a jolt, and she's the kind of comic icing that provides such relief, but I don't know that it's fine acting in any capacity.  She rarely gets quiet moments, and her body & face are used as derision without it being earned (we don't feel she, or even the writers, are in on the joke).  It's a loud, brash performance that was pretty par for this category in its first decade, but even adjusting for modern tastes, this isn't all that funny or fun.

Tuesday, September 15, 2020

OVP: The Long Voyage Home (1940)

Film: The Long Voyage Home (1940)
Stars: John Wayne, Thomas Mitchell, Ian Hunter, Barry Fitzgerald, Wilfrid Lawson, Mildred Natwick, Ward Bond
Director: John Ford
Oscar History: 6 nominations (Best Picture, Adapted Screenplay, Special Effects, Film Editing, Score, Cinematography)
Snap Judgment Ranking: 4/5 stars

Sometimes when we're doing these theme week write-ups we're getting arguably the most important nomination for a film (particularly when it's an acting week), or in many cases it's perhaps the only nomination.  That's not the case today.  While The Long Voyage Home was definitely cited for Best Editing, and therefore is a legitimate inclusion in this week's theme, you'll notice nominations for Best Picture & Adapted Screenplay that seem a bit more "headline-y" in terms of this movie.  The film, one of the lesser-known Best Picture nominees from perennial Oscar contender John Ford, the film was a bit of a departure for the director.  After all, it wasn't made at Fox (it was for United Artists), and was a downer compared to some of the major hits he'd had in the previous two years like Stagecoach, Young Mr. Lincoln, and The Grapes of Wrath, arguably his finest movie to that point.  The Long Voyage Home did not equal these film's successes at the box office (it didn't turn a profit), but Ford would be back pretty quickly with the massive success of How Green Was My Valley to prove his value to Hollywood.  However, financial success isn't always indicative of a film's quality, and Ford never made an uninteresting picture, so I was excited to embark on this viewing.

(Spoilers Ahead) The movie is based on a series of plays by Eugene O'Neill, and tells the tale of a motley crew of men who are on a British Tramp Steamer, headed from the Caribbean to England during the very early stages of World War II.  The men aboard all have different dreams for themselves, from get-rich-quick-schemes to sex with the women they meet in ports to the most wholesome of the bunch, Ole Olsen (Wayne), who simply wants to go home to his Swedish mother.  The men, though, don't have an easy lot-in-life, or an easy voyage, as they are traveling with dynamite, which could explode in the rough seas, and along the way they will have to travel through English waters that are under attack.  As the film goes, we learn more about the men, and they learn about each other, particularly what they're capable of as one of them dies during a storm (Bond), and another (Hunter) is accused (unjustly) of being a German spy, when in reality his secret alcoholism has caused him so much shame he's been driven to this dangerous life even with a wife begging him to come home (he, of course, dies, as these are based on O'Neill plays).  In the end, happiness is only there for Ole, sent home but in the process dooming the fate of another sailor, and the rest of the men reluctantly return to sea, knowing they do not have the luxury of an escape from its grasp.

It's easy to see why The Long Voyage Home was not a hit in its day despite the presence of both Ford & Wayne.  The film is dark-even Ole, the sweet, lovable man who has women flocking to have sex with him, at one point is drugged in hopes of kidnapping him onto a boat crew before he's rescued, and the movie isn't shy about telling us the tales of these men & their horrors at sea.  The sequence where Thomas Mitchell's Drisk reads Hunter's Smitty's letters, assuming they contain evidence of Smitty being a spy but in reality its from a wife begging her husband to forgive himself & come home to her (and the subsequent moment where Smitty of course dies before he can absolve himself to her), will make you cry, and this is a movie that doesn't indulge sentiment.  The story's a bit broad, the first twenty minutes drag a bit, and Wayne's Swedish accent is, to put it charitably, ill-advised.  But this is pretty much the definition of a hidden gem, the sort of movie that you start watching at midnight & can't put down.

The film received six Academy Awards, and I honestly wouldn't begrudge any of them, even if they're earned to varying degrees.  The Special Effects are cool, though not particularly groundbreaking (the big scenes that got this nomination are the gigantic, swirling storm that kills Ward Bond's character, and the later attacks on the ship that kill Hunter's), and the Score is sturdy but unmemorable.  The screenplay is an achievement, though-even with the sloppy first twenty minutes, it melds together four different O'Neill plays (no easy feat), and the editing helps with that, making the chapters seamless while still connected.  Editing is the "invisible art," which isn't the case here (we know when one script ends & begins more because of tell-tale cuts), but the movie isn't shy about bringing out sequences showing the physicality of this life rather than just dialogue shots, and that wasn't the case even in all of Ford's work, much less most work of the era.

The best nomination was the Cinematography.  I didn't know that this was lensed by Gregg Toland, who was the most important cinematographer of the 1940's, and it was done the year before Toland's masterwork Citizen Kane.  If you've seen Citizen Kane as much as I have, you'll notice similarities in the way that Toland uses deep focus techniques, and really plays with light & size on the screen in a way that we normally attribute to Citizen Kane as being the pioneer of, but it's proved here that Toland was already starting to perfect these techniques in previous movies.  The effect is marvelous-The Long Voyage Home is breathtaking, particularly the way that it uses bright & shadow, where even a man running in the dark can be just staggering (I picked the top photo as an example to exhibit, this, rather than where we'd customarily go with a glossy shot of Wayne in the movie).  If you see this, and you should, notice how glorious the camerawork is here, and pity me for having to pick between this, Waterloo Bridge, and Rebecca when we get to this OVP writeup.

Saturday, November 23, 2019

On Dangerous Ground (1951)

Film: On Dangerous Ground (1951)
Stars: Ida Lupino, Robert Ryan, Ward Bond
Director: Nicholas Ray
Oscar History: No nominations
Snap Judgment Ranking: 3/5 stars

Each month, as part of our 2019 Saturdays with the Stars series, we highlight a different actress of Hollywood's Golden Age.  This month, our focus is on Ida Lupino-click here to learn more about Ms. Lupino (and why I picked her), and click here for other Saturdays with the Stars articles.

We continue on with the work of Ida Lupino this week with On Dangerous Ground, considerably later in her film career than last week.  By the early 1950's, Lupino's career from the outside looked like it was on the wane.  Her contract with Jack Warner had expired in 1947, and as an actress she was largely doing freelance work in forgettable noirs and dramas at pretty much every other studio about-town.  However, personally it feels like Lupino was at the peak of her powers in Hollywood, as she was enjoying the fruits of her many suspensions of Warner Brothers, where she learned about the behind-the-scenes work of directors and writers, and had begun to direct films herself, including Outrage with Mala Powers and The Hitch-Hiker with Edmond O'Brien.  While our focus this month is on an actress's career on the big screen, rather than in the director's chair, we'll be focusing next week on one of the few films that Lupino made where she actually starred, so we'll have the great joy of seeing Lupino in front-of-and-behind-the-camera in a movie where she became the first female star of any renown to actually direct herself.  First, though, let's take a look at one of the movies she decided worthy of her starring in that took her away from her groundbreaking behind-the-scenes roles, and perhaps the one that looks most interesting on-paper considering it's directed by someone as celebrated as Nicholas Ray: On Dangerous Ground.

(Spoilers Ahead) In the film, Jim Wilson (Ryan) plays a cop-in-the-city who has clear anger problems.  He gets results, but does so through violence and intimidation of his witnesses and suspects.  He's assigned a crime in the country to investigate the death of a young girl whose father Walter Brent (Bond) basically threatens to beat Jim to "enacting justice" on the man who killed his daughter (he's going to kill the murderer himself).  While they are investigating, they eventually realize that the man who killed Brent's daughter A) likely has some sort of mental disability and B) is the brother of a beautiful blind woman named Mary (Lupino) who lives alone except for her brother, and is cautious but protective of him.  She makes a deal with Jim that she'll convince her brother to give himself up for the law in exchange for his protection from Brent, and that trust eventually gives Jim something of a change-of-heart about his "city ways."  Despite that, her brother still dies in an accident during the chase, and Mary is left alone...until in the film's final moments Jim decides to go back to her, as he's clearly fallen in love.

The movie's noted for a few reasons.  For starters, it's hard to pinpoint the genre of what this picture actually is.  The film obviously has the tenets of a noir, with the central death of a young woman driving so much of the plot, but it feels more like an intimate character study.  Though it clocks in at only 82 minutes, the plot is short for a noir (a genre noted for throwing in a number of curveballs and misdirections), as we know who the killer is almost from the onset, and thus it's really the interactions between Jim, Brent, and Mary that drive the catalyst of the story.  Lupino is quite good as Mary, finding aspects of the character that aren't in the script, like her rigidity both in her principles & simply in the way she walks.  This is the sort of role that had won Jane Wyman an Oscar three years earlier, and while I doubt Lupino would have had such illusions for On Dangerous Ground (it's hardly the big-studio showcase that Johnny Belinda was), she gives more subtlety than Wyman did in the biggest moment of her career.

The movie's most marked characteristic, though, is its score.  For anyone who has ever seen, say, Citizen Kane or Psycho or Taxi Driver, you're familiar with the work of Bernard Herrmann.  This film is composed by Herrmann, and was considered one of his favorites.  The movie is the original source of the famed Have Gun Will Travel theme, and has a gorgeous recurring theme surrounding Lupino's Mary featuring the viola d'amore, a set of the music that Herrmann was so smitten with he gave the musician who played the instrument, Virginia Majewski, credit on his own title card.  Combined with a plot that's interesting enough to keep you guessing (even if you know the ending a mile away) and the always consistent actorly sensibilities of Lupino & Ryan, Herrmann's score is another way for me to recommend this picture-it's genuinely lush, the sort of gemlike work that you don't expect to find in a seemingly throwaway B-movie of the 1950's.

Sunday, March 03, 2019

The Searchers (1956)

Film: The Searchers (1956)
Stars: John Wayne, Jeffrey Hunter, Vera Miles, Ward Bond, Natalie Wood
Director: John Ford
Oscar History: I don't know how, but somehow in the year Around the World in 80 Days was deemed the best movie of the year, The Searchers wasn't good enough to be nominated in one single category (though weirdly Patrick Wayne's pipsqueak of a cavalryman managed to win the Best Newcomer Golden Globe)
(Not So) Snap Judgment Ranking: 5/5 stars

As some of you who follow this blog are aware, 2018 was the year I got into "retro screenings" of classic films, pictures that play as retrospectives at actual movie theaters.  In 2018, I caught On the Waterfront, one of my all-time favorite movies, at a "secret movie night" (where you don't know what movie you're buying the ticket for until it starts), and I didn't think I'd luck out by having a movie I somehow loved even more come up in 2019, but first screening out the gate, I saw the title cards to The Searchers scroll across the screen and I think I might have squealed to my friend sitting next to me "this is one of my favorite movies!"  The Searchers, the finest hour of both John Ford and his longtime muse John Wayne, is a spellbinding western, frequently playing with the cinematic trope that these two men invented, inserting realism and pessimism into the western story, making way for a new series of films in the genre (it's impossible to imagine movies like Once Upon a Time in the West or Unforgiven existing were it not for The Searchers).

(Spoilers Ahead...but, come on, you've never seen The Searchers?!?  Get on it!) The movie takes place in Texas (but is clearly filmed in Arizona & Utah), starting in 1868, and follows Ethan Edwards (Wayne), a confederate soldier who is returning home from the war to his brother and sister-in-law's house.  It's obvious he has at least some criminal background, and from the opening scenes is hostile to the adopted son of the couple, Martin Pawley (Hunter), who is part Cherokee Indian.  Chasing after Native Americans who have taken some of the cattle from a neighboring farm, Ethan & Martin trek off after the cows, not realizing that this is a trap, and soon we learn that the Native Americans have killed Ethan's brother and sister-in-law, and kidnapped their two daughters.

The film follows Ethan and Martin as they track these girls seemingly for years, first one of them dying (and the film, as heavily as can be indicated in 1956, saying she was raped by her captors) but the other, younger daughter Debbie (played as a teenager by Wood), still being in the Native American camp.  As the years go by, we come to realize that Ethan has less interest in saving Debbie and is more intent on killing her as retribution for the Native Americans kidnapping her, his blind racism no longer seeing his niece but instead just another Indian woman.

It's this observation that gives The Searchers almost all of its power, even when it strays into more traditional western territory for the 1950's.  The film is littered with the occasional comic set pieces that so frequently adorned Wayne's movies.  We see Hunter having a comedic fistfight with someone who is pursuing his on-again-off-again girlfriend Laurie (Miles), as well as a recurring gag about how Martin accidentally marries an Indian woman who follows he and Wayne around for a while, but Ford has something to say here that would be absent from a lot of his pictures with the Duke, and somehow picks one of the most by-the-book stars in film history to do so.

Wayne has never been better (and Hunter more beautiful) than in The Searchers.  Passionately lit by Winton C. Hoch (who would win Oscars for the Wayne pictures She Wore a Yellow Ribbon and The Quiet Man), Ethan Edwards is the best thing that Wayne ever did, bringing a humanity to a largely inhuman person.  His Ethan is a cruel, racist, but all-too-real man whose bigotry overshadows any humanity that might lie underneath, a fact we see as he abandons his quest for rescue for one of revenge.  Westerns at their very best show men who are so towering, but incomplete that they can rough it through even the harshest of existences, detached from life due to the impossible hardness that life in a perilous country requires; they are not heroes, but simply people put in impossible times.  Ethan Edwards is arguably the quintessential example of a fearless man who was needed to venture into the west, but then must disappear in order for civilization to have a chance.  The final scenes of the picture encapsulate this ethos, with Laurie, Martin, and Debbie all going back into the house, but in a scene shot through a doorway, we see John Wayne saunter back into the wild, likely never to be seen by any of these people again.  It's a bittersweet ending that would be echoed six years later in Ford's The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance-the hero who must live on past his purpose, forever a ghost of what he used to be.

Ride away, ride away...

Thursday, December 31, 2015

OVP: A Guy Named Joe (1943)

Film: A Guy Named Joe (1943)
Stars: Spencer Tracy, Irene Dunne, Van Johnson, Ward Bond, James Gleason, Lionel Barrymore, Esther Williams
Director: Victor Fleming
Oscar History: 1 nomination (Best Original Story)
Snap Judgment Ranking: 2/5 stars

Sometimes a film is more about the backstory, at least a classic one is, for me.  While A Guy Named Joe made it onto my viewing docket mostly because it was nominated for an Academy Award, my familiarity with it was not in regard to it randomly losing a trophy to Going My Way, but instead due to some of the behind-the-scenes tension that it elicited, particularly the famed car accident involving Van Johnson that caused a delay in the film's production (a delay which helped launch Van Johnson's career as he was a newbie at the time and the studio wanted to replace him-when Spencer Tracy said no, Johnson got to keep the part and became a headliner as a result of this film) and the famed feud between Spencer Tracy and Irene Dunne (who adamantly disliked each other).  The actual film itself isn't nearly as interesting as the stories behind it, in fact, though it does keep an air of mystery that's rare in a romantic drama over what direction the ending will head.

(Spoilers Ahead) I think what made me dislike the film is that the movie is predicated in large part on who "owns" Irene Dunne's heart, and while this is true of a lot of romantic triangles (in fact, it's the basis of all of them), I really didn't like Tracy or Johnson's characters, and that's crucial to the plot of the film as you're meant to like them both.  Johnson's ace pilot is a little too green to believably fall for the more world-weary Dunne, a woman who has already had her heart broken and is clearly much older than Johnson (she was actually 18 years his senior in real life, and it shows in the way that she practically looks like his mother onscreen).  Tracy's Pete is a much better match, age-wise (he was two years younger than Dunne, for the record), but his personality and the way that he's meant to be a type of guardian angel and yet hasn't gained much perspective (frequently sabotaging Dunne's Dorinda in her quest to get over him and find happiness) is off-putting.  The film's focus would more smartly be on him trying to convince her to move on, but the fact that the basis of the movie is on him ruining her relationship with Johnson's Ted made me like him a lot less.

Still, there are occasionally scenes that make it worth the wait for this picture (particularly the climactic scene where Dunne herself is forced to go up into the cockpit and flies the plane), but they're few-and-far between and at two hours it pushes its luck, patience wise, by a solid thirty minutes.  I wish they would have pursued a little bit more the odd conundrum of the movie, particularly since Pete exists in heaven, and perhaps that should be his end goal-to get Dorinda to stay with him in spirit until they can meet up for the eternity.  This feels like A) a solid question for a movie of that time and B) actually a genuinely interesting idea for a movie in general, as I don't know that I've seen it and kind of wish Golden Age Hollywood would have done it as it would be relegated to a Christian-only studio somewhere at this rate.  As it stands now, the movie is pretty dull, and I find it odd that it made it into the writing category for the Oscar nomination and not something like sound (considering the persistent airplanes overhead) as its story is only interesting in a two-sentence description and not in actual execution.

Those are all of my thoughts on the film (it's pretty straight-forward, and not even the three movie star leads add much in terms of great panache), but hopefully you can spur some conversation in the comments.  Have you seen A Guy Named Joe, and if so weigh in on the love triangle, the behind-the-scenes drama, and whether or not this deserved an Oscar nomination.  And if not, at least let's hear about a favorite performance you have of Tracy, Dunne, or Johnson!