Showing posts with label 2016. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2016. Show all posts

Monday, July 04, 2022

Voyage of Time (2016)

Film: Voyage of Time (2016)
Stars: Cate Blanchett
Director: Terrence Malick
Oscar History: No nominations
Snap Judgment Ranking: 4/5 stars

As part of our month-long celebration of the 10th Anniversary of The Many Rantings of John, I am completing all of the remaining gaps in my Terrence Malick filmography (one of my favorite film directors) with what we're calling "Terry Tuesdays" throughout June.

While it is not on a Tuesday (I almost put it tomorrow, but figured I'd stick to the long weekend promise), we are finishing up the "Terry Tuesdays" lineup with Voyage of Time, the final film I needed to see to have completed the entire filmography of one of my favorite directors.  Malick's documentary is a unique film in a variety of ways.  First, there are technically two versions of this movie.  The longer version, which we'll discuss today, played at film festivals, specifically in Venice & Toronto, but if you saw this in theaters in the United States, it was likely a shorter, IMAX version that was narrated by Brad Pitt.  I live in Minnesota, and when this was initially released it only played in one theater in my state, and it was at the Minnesota State Zoo of all places, which meant that my budget-conscious heart at the time couldn't afford the price of both the movie AND the zoo ticket (2016 was a time of saving in my world as I was shoveling away for a new house).  I assumed I'd be able to catch it on home release, but the movie is next to impossible to find in the United States, and I had to get an international copy of the DVD to finally be able to watch it (Criterion, if you're listening, a Malick box set would be most appreciated, and adding this movie into that collection would be a wise move).

(Spoilers Ahead) The movie is the culmination of a project that Malick has been attempting since the early 1980's.  Essentially, though it's a documentary really it's more of a visual art project, showing us initially shots of human beings playing and enjoying life, and then moving all the way back to the Big Bang.  We then see the entire history of our solar system, including evolution, dinosaurs, mass extinction, the evolution of man, and the eventual demise of the sun.  Malick intersperses the movie with heavy-handed narration from Cate Blanchett (in full Galadriel mode) talking about "mothers" and speaking almost in poetry, rarely adding a lot to the actual happenings onscreen.

Voyage of Time is stunning, and I definitely liked it.  I think the dinosaur sequence and the later hunting sequences, despite being scenes that were not gorgeous cinematography (which abounds) might be the most successful because they provide the most narrative structure.  I will admit that I wished Pitt was the narrator not because I don't like Blanchett (I do), but because I feel like Blanchett's already so well-known for narrating the Lord of the Rings any movie that welcomes comparison does so while also inviting inferiority (no one can compete with The Lord of the Rings).  Watching this movie, I was struck by how much of it also borrows from The Tree of Life, which is a better Malick property.  You almost get the sense that while this is the movie Malick always wanted to make, he got tired of waiting for it to happen and made a version of this tale with The Tree of Life instead.  If you don't like Malick or have a low tolerance for him, this movie is not for you, but as I am a superfan, I left happy.

And with that, we not only finish up "Terry Tuesdays" but also our monthlong 10th Anniversary celebration.  I hope you enjoyed this extravaganza of posts & our multiple series & retrospectives.  We will continue into July with a new Oscar Viewing Project starting tomorrow as well as more reviews, politics, & whatever else comes to mind, but I am so thankful you joined me, and that I have this little corner of the internet to share my thoughts & passions with you.

Thursday, March 25, 2021

My 2016 Oscar Ballot

We are continuing our backtracking of all of the past OVP Ballots this week with 2016.  For those of you just tuning in, every Monday/Wednesday I profile a different Oscar contest of the past in my quest to see all of the Oscar-nominated (narrative, feature-length) films.  As an addendum to those, I'm also creating an "if I had a ballot" list of past contests that include who I would've nominated given complete control of the Oscar races.  We'll normally do these at the end of each year we profile (right now, we're doing 2004 over on Monday's & Wednesday's so go check out the latest here), but as we've done a number of different past contests already, I'm playing catchup each Thursday until we're on track.  This week, we'll be hitting 2016-below are all 19 of our Oscar Viewing Project categories (I don't see enough to properly do Foreign Language Film), as well as links at the bottom of the page to for each Oscar race.  Let's get started!

Picture

Arrival
L'Attesa
Everybody Wants Some!!!
From Afar
Jackie
Moana
A Monster Calls
Moonlight
The Red Turtle
Silence

Gold: Moonlight doesn't give you time to breathe, it's a story that pushes forward & catches you, just like our lives.  Chiron's journey is one of struggle, but it's also one with consequence, and a cast working its heart out to craft this poignant tale.
Silver: No director working today is better about showing us simply a "slice of life" look at the world than Richard Linklater.  His Everybody Wants Some!!! is deceptively simple-the kind of college movie you expect to be doused in toxic masculinity.  Instead, it's a film about the fleeting nature of youth, and what it's like to hold your future in your hand.
Bronze: Jackie releases all of the shackles of a traditional biopic, and creates a brilliant art film.  With a towering lead performance, it gives us one woman, seemingly uncomplicated (but looks can be deceiving), who is put in glaring spotlights, both the glowing & the tragic.

Director

Barry Jenkins (Moonlight)
Pablo Larrain (Jackie)
Richard Linklater (Everybody Wants Some!!!)
Martin Scorsese (Silence)
Denis Villeneuve (Arrival)

Gold: Jenkins' genius isn't just in the triptych way he gives us Moonlight, but in the way that it tries to capture the eventuality that we become different versions of ourselves, like familiar strangers as we age & learn that certain things always matter, and others can just float away.
Silver: Linklater's stylistic flourishes aren't as indulgent as other directors, but in many ways he captures the essence of an auteur not with repetitive flare, but instead through simply putting a camera on actors and watching a naturalism emerge as they explore their characters.
Bronze: Perhaps Scorsese's most personal film in decades, Silence is a giant epic, one that could be swallowed whole if it weren't for Marty's keen sense of purpose, always keeping his Sebastiao focused on the same, determined end.

Actor

Casey Affleck (Manchester by the Sea)
Adam Driver (Paterson)
Andrew Garfield (Silence)
Logan Lerman (Indignation)
Trevante Rhodes (Moonlight)

Gold: Affleck's brilliance is not just in his perfectly-molded Boston schlub (he's made a career out of this particular prototype), but in the way he plays a man hollowed out by life.  Look at how he can't forgive himself, the way he refuses to let himself move on from unspeakable tragedy.
Silver: Rhodes has a tricky job here.  He has to inhabit the world of two different actors while also striking his own path, his own lived experiences, still in love but capable of being a different person.  He does that beautifully-you know this is the same scared Chiron, even if he has a new bravado.
Bronze: It is bonkers to me that Andrew Garfield can give a performance of this nature, one where he confronts his own faith, endures grueling physicality & must endure the weight of a 3-hour movie with little but his own perseverance...and somehow his first Oscar nomination is for Hacksaw Ridge.

Actress

Amy Adams (Arrival)
Juliette Binoche (L'Attesa)
Isabelle Huppert (Elle)
Natalie Portman (Jackie)
Tilda Swinton (A Bigger Splash)

Gold: Portman's work is initially impressive because she brings life to a figure who became basically a Barbie doll to the American public, by showing when the public persona was real, and when it was an illusion...the willingness to remain placid even when it meant true personal sacrifice.
Silver: I'll never get why it was this movie that the Academy decided to get snooty about Amy Adams, arguably her best work since Junebug.  Her performance here as a woman inspired by communication, but unable to share the pain she carries around is worn & felt.
Bronze: Juliette Binoche is also a woman carrying around the cruelty of life with her, but unlike our other two grieving mothers, she's aware of her own feelings, and while she's almost sorted through them, the film shows that loss is something we can never entirely let go of, and will always cling to memories of loved ones.

Supporting Actor

Mahershala Ali (Moonlight)
Ralph Fiennes (A Bigger Splash)
Lucas Hedges (Manchester by the Sea)
Tyler Hoechlin (Everybody Wants Some!!!)
Glen Powell (Everybody Wants Some!!!)

Gold: For such a small role, Mahershala Ali is given a gargantuan task.  He has to quickly establish himself not just as a major figure in young Chiron's life, but as someone he would want to emulate as he aged, even if he can't always explain why.  Ali does that with studied care, fleshing out a man given an opportunity to change another man's destiny.
Silver: I would honestly be fine just collectively giving the entire cast of Everybody Wants Some!!! a trophy.  If I have to pick a player to highlight, it'd be Powell, whose comedic relief is sharp & he has BDE dripping out of every corner of this performance-the bravado that can only come from being a young, straight dude in his twenties.
Bronze: Close behind him would be Tyler Hoechlin, inhabiting a different kind of swagger.  He's confident, but has the knowing glance of someone who doesn't understand that these will be his glory days, something he'll never be able to recapture.

Supporting Actress

Naomie Harris (Moonlight)
Dakota Johnson (A Bigger Splash)
Janelle Monae (Hidden Figures)
Octavia Spencer (Hidden Figures)
Michelle Williams (Manchester by the Sea)

Gold: The only actor who appears in all three parts of Moonlight, Naomie Harris gets the difficult task of forging an evolving (but constant) bond with three different actors, showing her own struggles in her relationship with her son.  Harris does this through keen accent work, and the way she shows what parts of her are hidden from view...until her addictions force everything to emerge.
Silver: Michelle Williams isn't given much screen time, but an actress who is famous for minimalism works well here.  Look at the way she plays Randi-a woman who needed to cut her husband out of her life not because she stopped loving him, but because he reminded her of the pain, and removing him was the only way she could get through the day.
Bronze: Monae is a performer of great style, and someone who can steal every scene she is in.  That is needed in her Mary Jackson, a woman who is determined to defy convention, even if the world around her can't see her true potential.

Adapted Screenplay

Arrival
L'Attesa
Embrace of the Serpent
Moonlight
Silence

Gold: Moonlight is so good it feels like you're studying a screenwriting class while you're watching it.  The triptych unfolds so that no part of the film is easy, and the connections aren't giving you obvious answers, but with biting, profound dialogue we start to see the message of Chiron's life.
Silver: "Big" is the only thing that can properly encapsulate a movie like Silence, but don't get totally caught off-guard by the movie's size-there are quieter moments throughout that give you rich speeches & treatises on faith (and what it demands of our spirits).
Bronze: Arrival is a study of grief, a look at how we allow ourselves to feel our emotions (joy, pain, sorrow), and the way that wonder & the experience of new possibilities can open up all that we're feeling.

Original Screenplay

Everybody Wants Some!!!
From Afar
Jackie
The Lobster
Manchester by the Sea

Gold: Richard Linklater, when he's on his game, writes a better script more than any other person working right now.  Everybody Wants Some!!! flows so well because Linklater knows how to adapt his script to his actors (he's famously collaborative), making the film have a spontaneous, in-time nature.
Silver: Pablo Larrain takes everything you hate about biopics (narration, familiar character pitfalls), and turns it on its head in Jackie, giving us a a sharp character study of a woman who doesn't want you to know what she's thinking.
Bronze: From Afar may be the most obscure film I cite in this article, but that's your fault, not its.  A sly look at the dynamics of sex, money, & control, the film is a bleak noir, one that will keep you guessing right up until the final seconds.

Original Score

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them
Jackie
A Monster Calls
Moonlight
Nocturnal Animals

Gold: The score of Moonlight is sparing, a litany of chopped violins that hang in the air even when they are no longer playing, giving us versions of the same theme (just like the three actors playing the evolving Chiron).
Silver: Never uplifting, Mica Levi's work in Jackie is more focused on making sure that we see the real woman behind the plastic princess, giving us a distinctive (but never over-powering) score to accompany her.
Bronze: A Monster Calls is a movie that demands your heart come along for the ride, and as a result we get soaring ballads, ones that are filled with adventure but also acknowledgement that this is a battle that we aren't necessarily going to emerge victorious from (just appreciative).

Original Song

"City of Stars," La La Land
"Drive It Like You Stole It," Sing Street
"How Far I'll Go," Moana
"I Am Moana," Moana
"Try Everything," Zootopia

Gold: It has become something of a hobby in the past year to bag on Lin-Manuel Miranda, but I can't join in not only because I like his positivity, but also because of his genuine talent.  You see that in the way he provides his own sense of uplift in helping Moana (and "How Far I'll Go," our gold medalist) capture not just the magic of her journey, but perhaps more important, recapture Disney in the 1990's.
Silver: We've chronicled many times my complicated relationship with the movie La La Land (a film I wish I loved more than I do), but the closest the film comes for me to truly engaging with what it hopes to be is in the beautiful, fleeting "City of Stars."
Bronze: Few end credit songs are worth your time in this category-it's too hard to sum up a movie without it being catering.  That's not the case with the effervescent, supporting "Try Everything" (perhaps the dancing gay tigers help?).

Animated Feature Film

Moana
The Red Turtle
Zootopia

Gold: The only category we go three-wide on (though 2016 is the rare year where a five-wide race wouldn't look like stretching), I have to pick The Red Turtle as the best-in-class of the bunch.  More fable than plot, the movie is gorgeous (the use of red and black-tres magnifique!), it honestly feels more like The Bicycle Thief than a movie for children-elegant & foundational.
Silver: Moana is also obsessed with color (here finding gorgeous blues & greens), but is obviously geared toward a family audience.  The best Disney musical since Pocahontas, it elicits joy from every orifice, and also that pig is just adorable.
Bronze: Zootopia cannot be denied its own blurb.  Disney does something almost unheard of here-creating a complete universe onto itself from scratch, and doing so while providing homage to everything from 80's cop movies to The Godfather (all while giving a needed & never preachy ode to tolerance for audiences young & old).

Sound Mixing

Arrival
Jackie
Moonlight
Silence
The VVitch

Gold: I'm more into subtle than the Academy is with this category, which is why I feel pretty confident in proclaiming Jackie the best sound mixing of 2016.  The movie's score intrudes like a ghost, and we get that motif throughout the film (reserving only the loudest scenes for the most horrific moments of Kennedy's life).  The moments after, as she walks the White House, feel as if we're hearing a museum come to life.
Silver: Speaking of movies that play with volume, Silence lives up to its name giving us a wide cacophony of sound design, cleverly playing with a array of expansive quiet to give us a sense of the solitude these young monks endure.
Bronze: Arrival is the most traditional nominee here, but it's a testament to the film in how it rarely feels generic.  Arrival's aural crafting comes from the main character's voices against a constant hum-a perfect duet of editing & mixing, necessary for an effects film of this nature.

Sound Editing

Arrival
Hacksaw Ridge
Kubo and the Two Strings
Moana
Rogue One: A Star Wars Story

Gold: Instantly distinctive, Arrival gives us a specificity to its aliens & ships-the sounds they create aren't duplicated or from the long litany of aliens we know by heart, giving us a new entry into the world of cinematic space.
Silver: Obviously the battle sequences, particularly the climactic ocean-front battle to stop the Empire, are at the top of anyone's list.  But I also loved the earliest scenes of Rogue One, where we hear the winds of a distant planet that becomes the background of young Jin's life.
Bronze: I'm not above acknowledging when a movie I didn't like has a great craft element.  That's the case with Hacksaw Ridge, which uses well-constructed action sequences and perfectly choreographed cascades of bullets to give us a sense of the omnipresence of battle for even a pacifist soldier.

Production Design

Jackie
La La Land
Passengers
Silence
Zootopia

Gold: I am still at a loss as to how Jackie missed with Oscar in this category.  The film obviously gives us hints of the character with the way that Mrs. Kennedy's Massachusetts home is tailored (even the messes) within an inch of their lives.  But the true "wow" here is the way that the art directors flawlessly reinvent the White House to be both historically accurate & feel like it's being lived in in real time.
Silver: Similar to Hacksaw Ridge, I can acknowledge a bad movie's best qualities, and pretty much anyone watching Passengers can understand that its production design is totally inventive.  A combination of cruise ship & holodeck, it gets at the excessive indulgence & decay of hopping halfway across the galaxy to find adventure that was possible in your own world.
Bronze: Animated films aren't given enough credit here (they are, after all, creating worlds in the same way), and few animated films feel more at-home with production design as Zootopia, which gives us not just one world but all of those motifs into other creative districts of the world.

Cinematography

Jackie
Knight of Cups
La La Land
Moonlight
Silence

Gold: Few films play more with actual color & mood than Moonlight.  Look at the way that the blacks, blues, & yellow lighting cues pop across the screen from the background, telling a visual story to Chiron's life, or the way that James Laxton is able to inform so much of his main character's tale through water, the eternally morphing element.
Silver: I mean, we all know about my crush on Terrence Malick at this point, so this shouldn't come as a surprise, but Knight of Cups continues his love affair with Emmanuel Lubezki, giving us urban & suburban landscapes that come to life behind his camera.
Bronze: Silence feels plucked out of its centuries-old time frame, looking crisp but also as if we're genuinely pulled into a different era, never staged or like we're getting a simple recreation...you feel as if you've been transported to a different era.

Costume Design

The Dressmaker
Everybody Wants Some!!!
Hail, Caesar!
Jackie
Silence

Gold: Never resting on its pillbox laurels (and it could have), Jackie makes the costumes in its films look stiff, boxy, real...more authentically specific to their time frame, so we feel like we're getting historical photos truly coming to life.
Silver: Sure it's not "historically accurate" in the same sense, but sometimes you just want to look at something truly gorgeous for two hours.  That's what happens with the impeccable, classy designs Kate Winslet's character brings to The Dressmaker.
Bronze: Yes, I would assume that outfitting the tight-fitting clothes on the men of Everybody Wants Some!!! was its own reward, but that doesn't mean that I can't appreciate the "if you've got it, flaunt it" care that they bring to these athletes' wardrobe.

Film Editing

Arrival
Embrace of the Serpent
Everybody Wants Some!!!
Moonlight
The VVitch

Gold: I don't know how the editors were able to cobble together Arrival, a seemingly impossible job.  Given a film focused on academic research (admittedly with aliens) for one half and a deep twist you aren't meant to figure out in the other, the editors craft a seamless movie from two divergent moments in a woman's life.
Silver: Moonlight is a movie that is played across three different chapters, but the editors don't rely on this too heavily, avoiding making connections between each "Chiron" wink-y or repetitive, instead giving us the gradual crescendo to the man he'd become with judicious looks into each actor's work.
Bronze: A third film that is all about balance, Embrace of the Serpent is meant to give us a world we don't know twice, never pointing out the clear frames-of-reference we have from earlier, a world always evolving into itself.

Makeup & Hairstyling

Florence Foster Jenkins
Hail, Caesar!
Jackie
Silence
Sing Street

Gold: One last gold medal for the technical wizardry of Jackie.  So often Oscar gets distracted by monsters or latex in this category, but when it comes right down to it, it's about making sure that we are seeing the characters for who they are...Jackie does that with painstaking period work, particularly with the hairstyles.
Silver: On the opposite end is Silence, not in the world of latex, but instead making the beautiful less desirable.  The use of blood-and-dirt in the film is detailed & increasingly more dramatic (hygiene standards have clearly evolved in the last 400 years as we see in Andrew Garfield's main character).
Bronze: Old Hollywood glamour, sometimes played for laughs, comes throughout the story of Hail, Caesar!, paying homage to figures like Esther Williams & Hedda Hopper without ever outing themselves as "stealing" their looks.

Visual Effects

Arrival
Fantastic Beasts & Where to Find Them
Kubo and the Two Strings
A Monster Calls
Passengers

Gold: Our other constant victor in the tech categories takes our last gold, as Arrival uses its effect to great aplomb, never feeling too gimmicky or indulgent, but striking the right, dramatic tone for the tender story at its core.
Silver: This category isn't just about looking spectacular-it's also about creating a sense of wonder & majesty that matches your story.  A Monster Calls does that with inventive, glowing effects work that might not have the budget of a Transformers, but gets more out of what it's trying to achieve in making a strong movie.
Bronze: Obviously there is CGI throughout, but in terms of a single achievement, no VFX moment in a 2016 movie is quite as jaw-dropping as the "floating water" drowning sequence that comes in the halfway point of Passengers.

Thursday, May 28, 2020

OVP: Picture (2016)

OVP: Best Picture (2016)

The Nominees Were...


Shawn Levy, Dan Levine, Aaron Ryder, & David Linde, Arrival
Scott Rudin, Denzel Washington, & Todd Black, Fences
Bill Mechanic & David Permut, Hacksaw Ridge
Carla Hacken & Julie Yorn, Hell or High Water
Donna Gigliotti, Peter Chernin, Jenno Topping, Pharrell Williams & Theodore Melfi, Hidden Figures
Fred Berger, Jordan Horowitz, & Marc Platt, La La Land
Emile Sherman, Iain Canning, & Angie Fielder, Lion
Matt Damon, Kimberly Steward, Chris Moore, Lauren Beck, & Kevin J. Walsh, Manchester by the Sea
Adele Romanski, Dede Gardner, & Jeremy Kleiner, Moonlight

My Thoughts: And here we go.  After 19 contests, and way too long spent between them, we are at the finish line ready to discuss the Best Picture nominees of 2016.  A bit of housekeeping before we go into the contest-if you are new, you can review all of the past 2016 contests, as well as Best Picture races (and the links to any contests within those years) in the giant link roundup at the bottom of this article.  We will be kicking off a new season very quickly of this series on Sunday, with new competition articles as early as next week.  My goal, as ever, is to get this done in roughly three months, but as I have not pulled that off to date, I shall stop promising it to you (even if I'm goaling it still for me).  What I will promise is a fitting tribute to these nine films we know so well at this point, and we will start that conversation with Fences.

Fences is a weird film for me to review, because the story and acting are solid.  This is an incredible feat, and the writing is brilliant-August Wilson at his best.  But it's basically a staged play, the kind we used to get more of in the 1950's where it felt more natural for such a situation (as most films limited their set counts and where they could film their movies).  Here, I feel like Washington's take on Fences never escapes its Broadway beginnings, playing too loud or too constrained, trying to bring not just the words of Wilson's play to life, but the play itself.  This would be mesmerizing, five-star entertainment in real life, but on a movie screen it feels like he doesn't meet the challenges of the medium he's crafting for, and as a result we get only a ground-rule double rather than a home run.

The same could be said for Lion, but instead of missing its setting, here we get a movie that can't ever get past its incredible first half.  The nail-biting adventure of the first half of Lion, of a young boy who moves halfway across a gigantic country by accident, is the stuff of great movies-it's action, drama, and terrific cinematography all rolled into one.  The movie never captures that energy in the second half, though, becoming a family drama without enough introspection or vision.  I'm excited this brought about new chapters for Nicole Kidman & Dev Patel's careers, but the movie is just fine.

This is more than I can say for Hacksaw Ridge.  I've been more charitable with this movie than most throughout these write-ups, but when it comes down to it, this is a film with some very strong elements that doesn't ultimately come together.  The first twenty minutes are embarrassing, and the movie's middle third is more homoerotic than you could possibly imagine, but that really doesn't make it a good movie (even if it got my attention with a cascade of shirtless men).  The final third the movie comes to life, but with so little payoff emotionally, we are left with some creative action sequences, but some featuring a bunch of soldiers we haven't grown to cherish or aren't really invested in their journey.  This has always been a problem with Gibson's movies, but it's easier to scrutinize with the shimmer of a Best Picture nomination surrounding Hacksaw.

Hidden Figures is, along with Hacksaw, the only other "populist" film of this bunch, but whereas Hacksaw simply ignores anything not directly related to the meat of its plot, Hidden Figures makes these touches the main course.  The three central performances are sublime, but they're also great movie star turns from actresses who can, well, act.  The movie isn't as deep as it could've been, but it doesn't matter-it generally avoids the sort of "white savior" racial politics that might have made it age poorly (specifically with Kevin Costner's character), and shows three accomplished women & the "hidden" story that they made incredible.  Fun, fluffy, but really well-done popcorn fare.

Moonlight is not popcorn fare by any means, but it might be the most cinematic movie of all of these when I think about it in this context.  I've talked about the best elements of this a few times now, but the pacing once again bears repeating.  Moonlight doesn't give you time to breath-it pushes Chiron's story forward, and those who are left behind (both onscreen and off) are forced to reckon with the young man he's become.  Visually compelling, haunting music, great performances-Moonlight is not the kind of film you normally associate with the Oscars, but it's so good that it demands Oscar's attention.

La La Land is the sort of film that you associate with the Oscars, in many ways because it associates itself with so many Oscar-nominated classics.  The movie is occasionally luminous-the costumes and cinematography are gorgeous, and the two leads have never looked better.  But the film is too much facade, not enough substance, and certainly not enough originality when it comes to how it pays homage to movies of the past.  In a lot of ways it reminds me of The Artist-a film that seems tailor-made for my sensibilities, and yet I was left cold by the director's inability to make it sing.

Manchester by the Sea is also the sort of film you associate with the Oscars, albeit not necessarily in Best Picture.  While this field oftentimes is littered with depressing tales of humanity, they aren't usually as subtle and specific as what Kenneth Lonergan crafts for Manchester.  The movie simmers and stirs, making sure to highlight each performance and each curve of the story without it feeling forced or too quick.  Manchester is a good lesson to the many, many lesser dramas that get nominated for a plethora of awards each year-focus on the story rather than ensuring a character meets a specific arc.

Then again, if you make a film that is leading to one specific arc, you need to ensure that what came before it will make that twist worth it.  Arrival is loving cinema, unfolding with great wonder, but it would fall apart if we didn't care enough about Amy Adams' Louise by the end in order for us to feel the bittersweet emotion of the final scenes of the picture.  Arrival achieves that final moment, and it does so after giving us a great leading performance (that should have been nominated), wonderful visual effects and beautiful cinematography.

And that leaves us with Hell or High Water, the movie weirdly of this bunch that I most want to see again after writing about these pictures for so long.  Hell is a really good movie, and the sort of morality tale that people forget was central to the western, possibly my favorite film genre (give or take noir).  David Mackenzie spices this film just right with solid performances, believable twists, and escalating stakes so that we stay vested, even if we don't always understand why we're taking a detour.  This is the sort of film that people forget was nominated, and then revisit & reassess as better-than-they-originally thought twenty years later, a classy & smart choice by the Oscars.

Other Precursor Contenders: The Globes split their nominations between Comedy/Musical and Drama, so we have a full ten nominees here.  The Drama categories went all with Oscar-nominees, bringing Moonlight to the top over Hacksaw Ridge, Hell or Hight Water, Lion, and Manchester by the Sea.  In Comedy, we saw only La La Land of Oscar's choices (it won), besting 20th Century Women, Deadpool, Florence Foster Jenkins, and Sing Street.  BAFTA still only goes five-wide, though they did have the very British I, Daniel Blake losing to La La Land, which also beat Arrival, Moonlight, and Manchester by the Sea.  And finally, the PGA Awards once again goes ten-wide, with every Best Picture nominee accounted for, as well as Deadpool (oh, the PGA), and La La Land emerging victorious.  If we were still in the ten-wide field you could make a lot of arguments, some even sound for a film like Deadpool, but my gut says it would've been Nocturnal Animals, which had a lot of last-minute momentum even if it stalled out with AMPAS.
Films I Would Have Nominated: Since Oscar is given nine slots in 2016, I'm going to get the same (I hate when people give a laundry list of snubs without acknowledging that there is a finite number of slots you can fill for a category).  I would keep my Top 3 here (with sincere apologies to my #4, who might on some days make this cut), and then add in six other favorites we've talked about a lot throughout these write-ups.  Certainly the introspective Jackie, the epic Silence, and the clever Everybody Wants Some! must make the cut, as will my personal beloved A Monster Calls.  I'd also add in two under-sung foreign language films: the grief meditation L'Attesa and the sexually-charged film noir From Afar, both of which you should add to your "to watch" list if you like smart, modern cinema.
Oscar’s Choice: The Academy went with the expected La La Land over some bolder choices...wait, no, that's not right-we spoke too soon.  In one of the most unforgettable moments in Oscar history, we briefly had two Best Picture winners, but it was Moonlight that ended up victorious.
My Choice: Moonlight was a shock, and a pleasant one.  The best film of the year, and the best film that the Oscars had honored for their top prize in almost a decade.  Follow that with (in order): Arrival, Hidden Figures, Manchester by the Sea, Hell or High Water, Fences, Lion, La La Land, and Hacksaw Ridge.

And with that, we close 2016, though it will carry on in the comments if you so choose.  Are you with me on Team Moonlight, or do you join many of the precursors voting for the "City of Stars?"  What was the tenth place film-it feels like Oscar nominated everything that was remotely in conversation here?  And who ended up with a better lineup for Best Picture-Oscar or me?  Share your thoughts on anything 2016-related below!


Past Best Picture Contests: 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015

Wednesday, May 27, 2020

OVP: Director (2016)

OVP: Best Director (2016)

The Nominees Were...


Denis Villeneuve, Arrival
Mel Gibson, Hacksaw Ridge
Damien Chazelle, La La Land
Kenneth Lonergan, Manchester by the Sea
Barry Jenkins, Moonlight

My Thoughts: We are not going to do a full week devoted to directors like we did with Best Actress last week, but we are going to do something equally momentous-by Friday, we will have finished 2016, a project that we laid out as long ago as July of 2019 (still, sadly not the longest series we've done for an OVP ballot).  If you are curious about past contests, either from 2016 races or for past Best Director matchups, I have very kindly linked all of them below!  But now, let's get into these guys, and we're going to start with Kenneth Lonergan.  

Lonergan is, weirdly enough, the most-nominated person of these five directors (this is Villeneuve's only nomination, the other three nominees have been cited three times each), though it's his first time for directing.  Manchester we've talked about a lot over this series, but the direction isn't really where you initially head with the picture-it's more a writing or an acting triumph.  That said, the way that he lays out some of the scenes, and how he keeps certain scenes that would be "big" with a less subtle director back so he can have a bigger payoff later, shows how meticulous he is with his directing.  Manchester brings the stories of these people to life, making them feel flesh-and-blood but also sadly relatable, as if we project our own personal tragedies on them.  Lonergan's steady hand behind the camera might not cause this, but it certainly allows it to blossom.

Moonlight could also fall under the guise of an acting or writing triumph rather than one for its director, but it doesn't, and I don't think it even got those sorts of arguments during 2016 because of Jenkins' mesmerizing ability to keep the movie flowing.  Moonlight doesn't allow you to just sit back and wait for what happens next-it instead jolts you ahead, as life does, even when you're not ready for it.  Jenkins makes his elegant, introverted drama have the speed of a roller coaster, and it's a winning, risky combination that I'm glad the Academy paid tribute toward.

Jenkins chief competitor on Oscar night was young Damien Chazelle.  La La Land could never be confused as a writer's or actor's film-this is Chazelle's vision through-and-through.  It's just unfortunately messy.  Chazelle frequently borrows from movies like The Band Wagon and An American in Paris, but it feels more like copying than homage, as if he's presenting this as his own ideas he's giving so little spin on the originals.  Scenes in La La Land are choppy and unnecessary (the entire subplot with John Legend is weirdly off-beat for the movie), and it genuinely feels like an ode to musicals made by a guy who doesn't like musicals.  I've come around on Chazelle's talents with First Man, but here he whiffs badly-arguably the worst aspect of La La Land might be its misguided direction.

Denis Villeneuve is another director who I have had both hits and misses with, but Arrival is by-far my favorite of his films, and the one that I think he directs with the most confidence in what he's doing.  Villeneuve creates a gorgeous vision with Arrival-it has distinct flavors and moods that lend itself well to an auteur styling, even if it's in the trappings of a big budget SciFi adventure.  I love the way that he sells the big scenes, like Louise's first communication with the aliens, and the scenes toward the end where we realize the truth of the plot.  Villeneuve creates a sophisticated, sharp movie that leans into his best instincts.

And then we have Mel Gibson.  It's hard to talk about Gibson now considering his public persona has shifted from sexy family man to heavily-drinking anti-semite.  If this was a ranking of who I think is the better person or who I would want to have dinner with, Gibson would be an easy call for last.  But if we're going based on simply the film in front of us, Gibson is a director who understands story & how to bring a blockbuster to life.  Yes, the first twenty minutes are a snooze, but his action sequences are memorable and well-executed, as is how Desmond can live his pacifist truth, but it won't shield him from the tragedies of war.  There are a lot of problems with Hacksaw overall, but it's hard to fault Gibson in the director's chair so much as other decisions with the story.

Other Precursor Contenders: We get five nominees a piece from the precursors, a rare situation where all of the fields we look at match Oscar in their contender count.  The Globes gave their trophy to Chazelle, and bumped out Villeneuve in favor of Tom Ford for Nocturnal Animals (gotta love those celebrity directors!).  The DGA also went with Chazelle, but instead of Gibson they went with Garth Davis for Lion (who was my prediction for sixth place, for the record, even if Ford got higher profile nominations).  And finally at BAFTA, we saw both Gibson & Barry Jenkins sit out in favor of Ford and Ken Loach (I, Daniel Blake).
Directors I Would Have Nominated: I would have given a nomination for sure to Pablo Larrain, who has been so good so often lately, and had his best work so far in Jackie.  I also would lean heavily into two of my favorite directors working right now, Martin Scorsese (Silence) and Richard Linklater (Everybody Wants Some!).  Scorsese makes what might be his best film this century (give or take The Irishman) with Silence, and keeps a three-hour movie intoxicating, while Linklater gives you a bunch of hot baseball players & suddenly has you reconsidering your youth and its fleeting nature.
Oscar's Choice: While Best Picture was a nail-biter, I have to assume that Chazelle got this in a walk over Jenkins.
My Choice: Jenkins deserves the win here-he has not just a good movie, but one that is hard to craft & has a directorial vision.  Follow that with Villeneuve, Lonergan, Gibson, & Chazelle.

Those were my thoughts-how about yours?  I feel like more people have moved over with me on Team Jenkins than were on Chazelle's at the time, but anyone want to make the case for La La Land?  Am I crazy for not putting Gibson last here (based solely on the film's direction, not the man behind it)?  And who would Davis have bumped if he had made the cut?  Share your thoughts in the comments!
Past Best Director Contests: 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015

Friday, May 22, 2020

OVP: Actress (2016)

OVP: Best Actress (2016)

The Nominees Were...


Isabelle Huppert, Elle
Ruth Negga, Loving
Natalie Portman, Jackie
Emma Stone, La La Land
Meryl Streep, Florence Foster Jenkins

My Thoughts: All this week we're focusing on Best Actress nominees from years gone-by to honor this post, so I better at least get the actual post we're honoring out!  Today we move into the final acting category of 2016, Best Actress.  The lineup is noteworthy in recent years as Oscar has been a lot less likely to look outside of the Best Picture field for acting nominations, and yet only one of these nominees comes from a movie that was cited for the top prize.  The rest got a smattering of nominations (or in two cases, these were the only nominations the film got), though as we'll see when we get to the precursors, they were all hard-fought (this field had a lot of different, very viable options).

We're going to start with one of the women who probably just made the cut, an actress you should never count out when it comes to Oscar: Meryl Streep.  Meryl's nomination here (her 20th) at the time felt very vulnerable, and probably wouldn't have happened were it not for her fiery speech blasting Donald Trump (remember when he called her "overrated?), which got her huge points & quickly became a cultural touchpoint (a vote for Meryl felt like a vote against Trump, and people who love film love casting votes against Trump).  Her work here is fine.  Meryl is lovely, and her bigger scenes (like the concert scene and her final scene on screen) are great, showing the range she possesses as an actress.  I couldn't help but feel, though, that she could have made the picture more special as Streep (who seems to just be having a good time onscreen this decade, and not really "challenging" herself in the way she did from say 1978-2006) keeps the film too light & predictable.  It's good work, don't get me wrong, but this comes across as a nomination that happened more to make a statement & because Streep is a default option, rather than because she was truly in the Top 5 best of the year.

The other nomination that felt like it was probably on the chopping block that year (or at least could have gone a different direction with the precursors) was Ruth Negga in Loving.  Her work here is unusual for Oscar, who doesn't like his leading ladies introverted, and Negga's Mildred is very introverted.  Normally I am into introverted performances, and there are moments when Negga reacts with her eyes and her movements, particularly as a woman in love with a husband (who understands the parts of her relationship her husband doesn't understand) society doesn't expect.  But much of Loving is too reliant on the unsaid, and Negga's performance becomes a blank slate that none of the other actors, and in particular the director, doesn't want to write upon.  As a result, this feels too unfulfilled, too unknown, for a movie that cares desperately about Mildred's point-of-view, but is too intent on keeping it hidden to ever have it inform the major cruxes in the movie.

This is also a problem, I'm sorry to say, for Emma Stone.  Stone's work in La La Land, unlike Negga & Streep, was never in doubt for a nomination-it probably is the kind of performance that could win in most years.  But it's again too reliant on the unsaid in her performance, and here because the movie is so reliant on visuals, it pays off even less.  Loving has something to say, La La Land oftentimes feels like it's performing high-theft robbery from Vincente Minnelli & Stanley Donen, and Stone doesn't bring enough unique perspective to her character's motives to help elevate the film.  She's not bad (Stone's wide, expressive eyes can capture the emotion that Chazelle is going for even when the script can't), but between the okay singing & surface-level feeling she brings to some key scenes, it feels starved to me of depth.

This isn't the case for Natalie Portman, which is fascinating because she's playing a woman who famously had no depth in her public persona.  The genius of Portman's work in Jackie is not that she finds a soul behind a woman who was basically a Barbie doll to the American people (google Jackie Kennedy, and try to find an article where the first paragraph doesn't use the word 'glamorous,' 'elegant,' or 'beautiful'), but showing the ways the public persona was real, and when it was an illusion.  The accent work here is perfect, but it's in making an uncomplicated woman complicated, while still true to herself that is astounding to me; Portman's Jackie could be fictional, and we'd still understand the pressures she's under to remain placid, and how she slowly uses that to her advantage, even if it also means great personal sacrifice.

Isabelle Huppert is our last nominee, and is terrific (side note-am I the only one who is always a little embarrassed when acting gods get their first and probably only nomination, and then we make them lose at the Oscars...see also Charlotte Rampling for this feeling).  Elle is an intricate movie, one that will stun you & tries to upend sexual politics in a way that almost feels like an homage to Lina Wertmuller, but it works.  Her character and the complicated past she brings to this role is intriguing, and looks at an angle of celebrity we weirdly don't see in the movies, even in an industry obsessed with unexpected violence (her character is the daughter of a famed serial killer).  Again, like Negga & Stone, this is a character who doesn't reveal key emotions in critical scenes but unlike these two you feel in the acts prior that you understand why Huppert's Michele is acting the way she does, and the revenge she eventually gets (whether it's intentional or not).  Elle works because of her performance (it'd fall completely apart if it were in the hands of a lesser actor).

Other Precursor Contenders: The Globes separate their nominations between Drama and Musical/Comedy, so we have ten women nominated for these awards.  Drama went with Huppert as its winner (which felt like a slight surprise at the time, and in hindsight still does, though given the eventual Oscar nominations it probably shouldn't)-she beat Portman, Negga, Amy Adams (Arrival), & Jessica Chastain (Miss Sloane).  Emma Stone won an easy prize for Best Actress in Musical/Comedy, triumphing over Streep, Annette Bening (20th Century Women), Lily Collins (Rules Don't Apply), and Hailee Steinfeld (Edge of Seventeen).  SAG bumped Negga & Huppert, putting Adams and Emily Blunt (The Girl on the Train) into the conversation, with Stone winning, while BAFTA went with the same lineup, and again a victory for Stone (it also feels weird in hindsight that Huppert couldn't get with BAFTA since that nomination would be in their wheelhouse).  I would assume Amy Adams was therefore the sixth place finisher, but it's hard to tell-Blunt had a lot of momentum at the last minute that year, but Oscar doesn't really like Emily Blunt (they've passed on chances to nominate her many times), so maybe it was just Adams left holding the bill here.  
Actors I Would Have Nominated: I know that I would have found room for Amy Adams, who I found mesmerizing in Arrival.  This is one of her best performances, way better than some of the work they have cited her for, which makes her snub all the more perplexing.  I also would have thrown in Tilda Swinton for A Bigger Splash, as her mute rock star is terrific, and a reminder that Tilda has been one of the most consistent performers post her Oscar win we've had this century.  And speaking of consistent, Juliette Binoche is so flawless so often that ignoring her for a film like L'Attesa could be considered forgivable...but it's not.  She finds ways to express grief and regret that most other actresses would leave untapped.
Oscar’s Choice: Easily Stone.  Had Portman been willing to campaign (and if she'd won the Globe) there might have been some competition there, but Huppert's work is too avant garde to win this category, and Streep had just won, so Stone, by a landslide.
My Choice: I'm going with Portman over Huppert, though both should be commended for finding rich scripts & still putting more on the screen than what is in them.  I'll follow them with Streep, Negga, and Stone, in that order.

Those are my thoughts, but now I want to hear yours!  Are you with me on Team Natalie, or are you like the rest of the awards season lining up behind Emma?  Do you think we're due for a season where Meryl is in the mix but doesn't get an Oscar nomination (I feel like it's coming)?  And what happened with Amy Adams-how'd she miss here?  Share your thoughts in the comments below!


Past Best Actress Contests: 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015