Are you as tired as I am about the 2016 presidential race,
in particular the completely constant coverage of the election while absolutely
nothing seems to be happening.
Yes, a couple of Republicans have gone to campaign in New Hampshire or
started to proclaim their love of Iowa farms, and yes, Martin O’Malley seems to
be campaigning for anyone in a remotely competitive early primary state (Lucy
Flores, expect a phone call). But
there’s nothing new going on with this race. Nothing.
And yet, we’ve heard about it daily for months (that is, if
you’re a masochist like me who reads political news daily), and I figured it’s
time I get my two cents in on a few recurring themes and pet peeves. They are as follows:
The
Democrats are in Dire Straits if Hillary doesn’t run.
This is so ridiculous it almost doesn’t bear repeating, but
it’s said like it’s a fact so I figured I’d go there. The reality is that Hillary Clinton leaving would deprive
the Democrats of a frontrunner, but
hardly put them in a particularly bad position in 2016, just a neutral one. Some could argue that it would actually
behoove the Democrats to go with one of the governors being rumored for the
position (Martin O’Malley, Deval Patrick, Brian Schweitzer), rather than
someone so closely tied with the Obama administration. Democrats want Hillary to run because
she starts with an inherent advantage that other people don’t (average voters
genuinely seem to want her to be president), but honestly-any nominee for
either party is going to be formidable in such a sharply divided country.
Stop
talking like all of these candidates will run.
The reality is that not all of the names being bandied about
right now will run. Most
candidates savor their brief 48-hours of press regarding them announcing they aren’t
running for president, but very few actually make the leap, and even fewer are
genuinely competitive for the nomination.
And we’re not just talking about minor candidates like John
Kasich or Marsha Blackburn. We’re
talking major candidates. In the
past six cycles at least one MAJOR candidate
declined to run despite major press surrounding them entering the race. Mario Cuomo, Colin Powell, Jack Kemp,
Al Gore, Dick Cheney, and Sarah Palin all had strong, in some case
almost-locked down shots at the presidential nomination and yet for whatever
reason declined to enter. Between
Hillary, Jeb, and Chris Christie (probably the most “titan-like” of the
prospective nominees), I expect at least one will take a pass on the race.
Hillary
Speculation is a Pointless Endeavor
Hillary Clinton is not going to show her cards before
November. End of story. We can all speculate what a certain
speech means and whether she will run, but once you’ve said it once, there’s no
reason to continue chatting.
So I will say right now, for the record, that I think she
will run. She sounds like a
candidate, she wants to be president (she’s run before and clearly still wants
it because she could have shot down this buzz pretty easily), and she’s the
frontrunner in a way that no non-sitting president or vice president has been
since Eisenhower. And that, until
you hear more from her or her team, is all I have to say on the matter.
Politicians
are not like you and I
Hillary Clinton, and to a certain degree Jeb Bush and Joe
Biden, are frequently being talked about as if they will have to make a
gigantic decision about whether or not they want to run for president. And they will-it’s an enormous
endeavor, and as has been proven by someone like Fred Thompson in recent years,
you cannot just expect the nomination on a silver platter-you have to really,
truly want it.
But I am tired of reading, with Hillary in particular, as if
these are “normal” people who want to run for president and are making that
decision. These are not normal
people. They are presidential
cabinet secretaries, vice presidents, senators, and governors-people who are
incredibly powerful and frequently have worked with the office of president. They know what they’d be getting into,
and they all clearly would love to be president.
Another comment I want to make is regarding Hillary and the
“grandmother” question, as to whether Hillary would prefer to stay at home and
be a grandmother. I’m going to
answer that one right now-she wouldn’t.
Hillary Clinton is surely extremely proud of her achievements as a
mother and will be excited to have a grandchild in the family, but this is a
woman who has measured many of her political successes outside of exclusively
family. She’s a former Secretary
of State, a former senator, a very influential First Lady, and a hugely
influential person. She is not
going to quit all of that to spend time at home with her grandchild. I’m sorry if that sounds a bit
anti-family (I don’t mean it that way at all), but she is someone who measures
her successes both personally AND professionally, and is not going to sacrifice
one for the other.
Rand
Paul will never be president.
It’s risky to talk in absolutes in politics, but I can say
for certain that Rand Paul will never be President of the United States (if he
does become president, throw this comment back in my face). Neither, quite frankly, will Ted
Cruz. And there’s a decent chance
that unless she’s against one of these two men, Elizabeth Warren won’t either. These politicians inspire their bases
in major ways, and are capable of enormous influence and sway in their roles as
senators. They’re arguably the
three most influential freshmen senators in Washington right now. But they are too far to the extremes of
their parties to actually get elected.
The media keeps talking about how they are the potential dark horses,
but the reality is that the Democrats will go with Hillary, Biden, or someone
like O’Malley or Kirsten Gillibrand at the end of the day, and the GOP will
likely choose between Jeb, Christie, Paul Ryan, or Marco Rubio. They may be extremes in your eyes, but
they’re within the mainstream of their party’s primaries, and that’s what will
matter.
The
Electoral College Doesn’t Favor Republicans
Talk about it all you want, but the reality is that the
Electoral College, and the White House in general is very much a problem for
the GOP still. Maybe I just read
too much Chris Cillizza, but the overwhelming amount of press seems to put the
demographics issue in the future, with the GOP not having to encounter it in
2016, when in reality they’ve already encountered it in 2008 and 2012. The reality is that states like New
Mexico and Nevada have migrated pretty hard to the Democrats in recent years,
to the point where I think you’d need a nationwide wave in order to reach
them. The Democrats may not be
able to pick off Georgia or Arizona quite by 2016, but the scary truth for the
GOP is they don’t need to do so.
The Republicans could still win, of course (I currently have
about 124 electoral votes as being genuinely up for grabs in a generic
Republican vs. Democrat battle), but past elections aren’t kind to them in
those nine states (WI, CO, IA, OH, PA, NC, VA, FL, and NH). Virginia and New Hampshire both
continue to get bluer, while Pennsylvania, Iowa, and Wisconsin aren’t turning
red fast enough. The Republicans
could well cement Ohio again, and the presence of one of their favorite sons
could keep Florida, but the demographic problem is very real in swing areas,
particularly if the Democrats nominate someone like Hillary Clinton, who can
open up the playing field into states like Arkansas, Missouri, or Georgia while
not abandoning any Obama states in a major way.
And that’s where the last bit of the demographic problem is
going to be an issue. I frequently
read about how demographic trends could turn Texas, Georgia, or Arizona blue by
2020, but here’s the catch: there’s only one election in between then and now
that matters. If Hillary wins it,
where does that leave the GOP in 2020 when they have a dwindling electorate and
have to take on an incumbent?
Anyway, these are all great fodder for debate, but they’re
my last bits about the presidential elections of 2016 for a while until there’s
anything new. Do you have any
thoughts so far? Do you have any
pet peeves I missed? Share in the
comments!
No comments:
Post a Comment