Film: The Milk of Sorrow
(2009)
Stars: Magaly Solier, Susi
Sanchz, Efrain Solis, Barbara Lazon
Director: Claudia Llosa
Oscar History: 1 nomination
(Best Foreign Language Film-Peru)
Snap Judgment Ranking: 2/5
stars
Every year, there’s one. Dogtooth comes to mind immediately. As does War Witch. As does Bullhead. Amidst the rise-against-a-dictator movies and Holocaust
dramas and coming-of-age comedies, there’s a film that somehow doesn’t fall into
the standard fallbacks for the Oscars and instead comes out of left field
(though it happens every year, so we should expect it by now). In 2009, our OVP film year to be, this
movie was The Milk of Sorrow.
The thing about this out-of-left-field pattern is that it doesn’t
necessarily equate to a brilliant cinematic experience, and this is true of The Milk of Sorrow. The film’s plot is pretty thin, and I
actually went back and researched the movie’s history, learning about the very
violent period Peru experienced during the 1980’s and early 1990’s, when women
were frequently the victims of assault.
The belief in the region is that through the breast milk of the women
who became pregnant due to rape, their children experience the trauma and
suffer from the “milk of sorrow.”
(Spoilers Ahead) That is the
case of our heroine, Fausta (Solier), who has become psychologically-damaged by
the stories of her mother’s assault.
The film opens with a harrowing scene of her mother, on her death bed,
singing songs about her rape years earlier, and you can see that while the Milk
of Sorrow may not be a real thing, the damage of years of stories about the
evils of men surely has caused Fausta to become paranoid to an unhealthy
level. Fausta refuses to walk by
herself, and you see in her face the constant fear of suffering the same fate
as her mother, persistently pushing away romantic paramours and living a lonely
existence. The most famous scene
in the movie, where Fausta visits a doctor’s office and it is revealed that she
has put a potato in her vagina to stave off being assaulted is played for both
shock and comic value, and it’s one of the few scenes of levity amidst a
depressing slumber of a movie (it’s some dark humor, obviously, considering her
reasoning behind this serious medical infraction).
The film, Peru’s first to ever receive an Oscar nomination (I always
get all giddy when this happens, as I know it’s a fairly well-celebrated event
in countries getting their first Oscar nod), has little to offer aside from a
pretty strong performance from Solier in the lead and some provocative
camerawork. The cinematography
takes on a lavender and tan palette, occasionally erupting in beautiful shots
of green, and this is likely what drove the Academy toward the film. There is something to be said for this,
but the Oscars already have a category for Cinematography and this would have
been more appropriate there rather than citing the entire product, which is
dull and lifeless.
For those of you who have seen it, did you share a different opinion
than I regarding the movie (considering the reviews, I’m very much in the
minority)? What did you think of
the stellar visuals on display in the movie? Were you puzzled at the way the film remained so
wordless? And what do you think
Fausta’s ultimate fate was (the ending is ambiguous)? Share in the comments!
No comments:
Post a Comment