![]() |
| Lt. Gov. Geoff Duncan (D? or R?-GA) |
Duncan's decision is complicated, and worth examining (hence today's article!). For starters, his movement to being a Democrat is not really driven by ideology shifts, or at least that's not the primary driver. In the state legislature, he voted with all Republicans (but virtually no Democrats) on a bill that would require tracking the number of juveniles who sought abortions. While a state representative, he also supported conceal-and-carry, prohibited state-funding of sanctuary cities, required drug testing for state welfare, tried to stop the expansion of Medicaid, and voted to allow religious or faith-based organizations to decline to perform ceremonies that violated their religious beliefs. This is textbook conservative stuff, and while occasionally you'll find 1-2 of these things happening from a major moderate Democrat like Mary Peltola or Henry Cuellar, there's no Democrat in an office as important as Governor of Georgia that would back them all.
Duncan's decision to run as a Democrat, if he does so, is entirely based on Donald Trump. Duncan was one of several Republicans statewide in 2020 (including Gov. Brian Kemp and Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger) who stated that the efforts of the Trump administration to overturn the election there were unconstitutional, and that Joe Biden had successfully won the Peach State in that election cycle. This led to Duncan having something of a change-of-heart about wholehearted support of the GOP, to the point that when he declined to run for reelection in 2022, he also declined to endorse in that year's Senate race between Raphael Warnock or Herschell Walker. This was followed by the bigger step of endorsing first Joe Biden (and then, eventually, Kamala Harris) in the 2024 race against Donald Trump, making Duncan (along with Reps. Liz Cheney & Adam Kinzinger) one of the highest-profile cross-endorsements of that cycle, with Duncan even speaking on Harris's behalf at the Democratic National Convention that year. This led to Duncan being expelled from the Georgia Republican Party earlier this year in the wake of Harris losing that election to Trump.
Which brings us to 2026. Duncan said in an interview earlier this week with the Atlanta Journal-Constitution that he did not see anyone worth endorsing in the Republican Party, saying that they are all "embracing Donald Trump" and excoriated the "big beautiful bill" passing through Congress as being "an abomination of any sort of conservative values." But while he didn't criticize the Democratic field as being unacceptable-for-governor (likely paving the way for him to perhaps make an endorsement down the road), he did say of gubernatorial frontrunner Keisha Lance Bottoms (former Mayor of Atlanta) that she was not "positioned well to beat a Republican."
![]() |
| Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms (D-GA) |
But Duncan has done little to quell Democrats concerns that they should sacrifice much of their platform to give him a chance. Georgia is not, say, Mississippi where Brandon Presley was worth us putting up with him being anti-choice (something we discussed in that race a few years ago)-it's a purple state. Jason Carter & Lucy McBath are left-of-middle candidates that could win this seat. We shouldn't be putting up with someone who won't appoint pro-choice judges, who won't support left-of-middle views on education, gay rights, & healthcare in the state. I'm not saying that Duncan can't change his mind here, but generally when this happens it appears opportunistic. Sen. Arlen Specter, for example, struggled with this in 2010 when he switched parties, ultimately losing the nomination to Rep. Joe Sestak who ran as the "true Democrat" in that race (who then went on to lose the seat entirely to Pat Toomey). It's hard not to think that Democrats won't say the same thing here, especially given (like Pennsylvania in 2010), there's a long-time Democrat already running. When other recently-converted Republicans won the nomination as a Democrat (Charlie Crist in 2014, Barbara Bollier in 2016, Jim Webb in 2006) they did so largely by having the field cleared for them by the powers-that-be.
And it didn't go well. Bollier lost, as did Crist (he'd eventually win as a House Democrat, but his initial foray allowed Rick Scott another term as Governor). Webb won (barely), but party switchers usually run into trouble-their new base doesn't trust them (in some cases, like Specter & Crist, they've spent decades trying to defeat them), and they also don't feel super at-home in the new party either, espousing beliefs it's not clear are driven by a true change-of-heart or political expediency. Duncan isn't the only person facing this concern in 2026 (Rep. David Jolly, who weirdly lost to Charlie Crist in 2016 for the House, is a former Republican congressman who is running for Governor of Florida as a Democrat), but I do wonder if he's done too little work to beat someone like Keisha Lance Bottoms...even if I do believe he's correct that Democrats do not have a winning candidate yet in the race.


Nice piece, John. What do you think Duncan could do to improve his chances and seem more authentic? On that note, if, say, Adam Kinzinger decided to run for office (be it in IL or TX) as a Democrat (he won't do this, but I'd like to hear your opinion), do you think he's done enough of a job to convince Democrats that he can deliver?
ReplyDeleteAVHGPtWS-I think there's a big difference between Kinzinger running in Texas (where there's no Democrat in the past 30 years who has won statewide) and Illinois (where 80+% of the statewide wins have been Democratic). The former we don't know what it'd take to finally paint blue, and so Democrats are likely more willing to get creative on who their nominee is (this is also why Duncan, going for a Governor's office that the Dems haven't won since the 1990's, is going to be given a bit more leeway), while in Illinois he wouldn't stand a chance because too many Democrats have already put in the time.
ReplyDeleteIf I were Duncan, I'd probably do a high-profile, in-depth interview with the Atlanta-Journal Constitution, specifically pointing out a few viewpoints he's "evolved" on that will appease Democrats, while pointing out a few that he hasn't to underline authenticity. I think Dems are more open to this than Republicans are right now, but Duncan with his previous conservative record (and just standing against Trump) won't be enough to beat a Dem in a primary on his own...he's going to have to genuinely moderate.
I like that, John. Prove that the leopard has changed his spots. Do you think he'll actually go for it? And, interesting points on Kinzinger, too. I doubt he'd try it, but it shows a contrast among states.
Delete